Sentences with phrase «who changes their view»

Ironically (but importantly), this is not about Donald Trump's character or transgressions — now or prior — but about the character and transgressions of Evangelicals who change their views to suit the moment.

I think not, and have seen several people whose circumstances changed dramatically who changed their views when they ended up needing a warm coat, a meal or a warm bed.

I have more respect for people who change their views after acquiring new information than for those who cling to views they held thirty years ago.

Not exact matches

Rosenquist said a real change will come in viewing with younger Canadians, calling them «cord nevers,» an industry term used to describe those who don't bother at all getting a TV subscription.

Several bond market pros who had expected four rate hikes said the statement did not change their view.

According to studies conducted by Jayne Gackenbach, a psychologist at Grant MacEwan University, «people who frequently played video games were more likely to report lucid dreams, observer dreams where they viewed themselves from outside their bodies, and dream control that allowed people to actively influence or change their dream worlds — qualities suggestive of watching or controlling the action of a video - game character.»

More specifically, the «Mad Money» host wants to see if Williams, a non-voting Federal Open Market Committee member who previously talked about having three interest rate hikes this year, will change his view and advocate for four hikes.

Gilbert, who holds the Presidential Endowed Chair in Computing, is conducting his own study on whether society could change how youths view computer science.

Left, who has gained notoriety for successful bets against stocks such as Valeant Pharmaceuticals, explained that his rapid change of view on Twitter came as a result of the growing scrutiny surrounding social media and how companies handle users» personal information.

Obama's veto didn't come as a surprise to anyone who has listened to the president discuss his views on climate change.

What needs to change is how marketers view the shoppers who first purchase over the Black Friday / Cyber Monday weekend: not as «holiday shoppers,» but as customers who first engaged with your company over the holidays.

The net position — contracts to buy a foreign currency at a future date minus contracts to sell the same currency — is often watched by market analysts, who interpret its movements as a proxy for speculators» changing views of the short - term direction of exchange rates.

Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR) is the pioneer coalition of active shareholders who view the management of their investments as a catalyst for change.

While liberals have expressed outrage at Ms. Clifford's allegations, many conservatives in this district west of Phoenix say that her statements have done little to change their view of the president, or of candidates like Ms. Lesko who support him.

We believe that decentralised digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum will fundamentally change how the world views and uses money: cheaper, faster and safer transactions; more privacy and freedom; a significantly better user experience; and ultimately, more equality through giving everyone in the world access to the same financial system, no matter who they are or where they are from.

Mitt Romney Flip Flops because he makes a decision that usually makes sense... Then he gets a call from the «Prophets» of the LDS church and changes it with no question... is that who you want in office... look at the issues he flipped on... every one of them was changed to an LDS point of view.

5oo, ooo priests for 1.2 billion Catholics - There is the answer to why the abusing priests were tolerated.The conclave elected exactly who they wanted to be Pope - Someone who would not rock the boat.I believe Pope Benedict was advised to retire in light of the Federal indictment pending so this would not involve a standing Pope and the possiblity of him being found guilty.I further think this new election of Pope will allow the Church to change it's stance on the very controvertial issues the Church is facing ie.female priests being one, the decisions appearing more acceptable coming from a new head as opposed to reversed stance of standing Pope.This decision to retire, in the Churchs» view I believe is damage control and not neccessarily Pope Benedict's desire.If looked at for what it is - A very slick maneuver indeed.

For atheists who have no intention of changing their views, or even considering it, please stop walking into my AA meeting to tell me how my principles are wrong.

I had a fabulous dialogue with one of the evangelical ministers, who told me he couldn't change his theological point of view — and I said I could understand that.

I for one still choose to follow Jesus Christ, because I've seen His love, and nomatter how many lunatics profess Christ, it won't change my view of who Christ is.

Readers of Last Testament may wonder, however, what in this fourth of Seewald's book - length interviews with the man who became Benedict XVI is going to change the views of a world media locked into its own certainties and «narratives», much less the views of Ratzinger's longtime Catholic critics.

While the majority of writers continued to suppose that no real changes were needed, the minority who shared my view that the world was heading for disaster had little to offer in terms of constructive suggestions.

Religious leaders and pastors also come in for some gentle chiding from Wuthnow, who thinks they hold views about human action and social change that are simplistic and individualistic.

10:28 above... then the Fundamentalists should change their view on «hell» to be a «destruction» of the body and soul in hell for those who are unbelievers... in other words, annihilation... not eternal torment.

Then maybe as you continue with your friends who are not following the FG view, they may want to change down the line

I am tired of how people who believe in their own «gods» try to shove religion down other peoples throat, what I mean is if your religion doen not let you support guns then don't support it but also don't try to change it for everyone else who doesn't see it your way, I don't go around asking for you all's religion to remove crosses from public view because I don't believe and to remove the bible from public places (i.e. Hotels, Bookstores, etc.) so it can only be seen in their respective places of workship, Remember WE ALL ARE BORN ATHEIST, YOU ARE NOT BORN WITH THE KNOWLEDGE THAT THERE IS A GOD, YOUR PARENTS HAVE TO TELL YOU THERE IS A GOD, A DEVIL, HEAVEN AND EARTH... THEN IT BEGINGS.

Try reading Karen Armstrong's History of God for a detailed analysis of how God has evolved, or people's view of God has evolved if you prefer, over history.Either God is changing, or people's views of who and what God is has changed.

Africans, who were living in a period of rapid social change gradually came to feel that their traditional world - view was no longer adequate as a method of «explanation, prediction and control.»

Since the church teaching office appears determined to maintain its present positions, and even to discipline some of the theologians who propose other views, those interested in changing the church's official positions must first deal with the ecclesiological question.

Hausman had taken a more standard line on Bergson, although in the dialogue below it will be clear that Hausman is pondering in a preliminary way the very questions he has answered above.1 It must be clear to anyone who has read Hausman's paper above that his view regarding Bergson has now changed, and I think greatly to his credit, and to Gunter's.

Gadamer, of how the inspired text, which we question in order to find its meaning and relevance, questions, criticizes, challenges and changes us in the process -» Some who today raise the proper question, whether there are not culturally relative elements in Paul's teaching about role relationships (an the material has to be thought through from this standpoint), seem to proceed improperly in doing so; for in effect they take current secular views about the sexes as fixed points, and work to bring Scripture into line with them - an agenda that at a stroke turns the study of sacred theology into a venture in secular ideology.

In fact, I occasionally had long Latin conversations with Hürth, who was always cordial and seemed to enjoy such meetings, Though I have since changed my own views quite a bit, I remember with fondness my conversations with him.

It's easy for people who are more liberal on this issue to claim the pastoral high ground (indeed, Chalke's piece is partly pastorally motivated), but that ignores many who will be hurt to read his change of view, and what they will regard as a sharp shift from scripture.

It has always been an insoluble problem for harmonists and writers of the life of Christ; and it is clear from the way Matthew — and perhaps John — and even Luke used the materials of the Gospel of Mark that they, who were its earliest editors and commentators, did not view the Marcan order as chronological or final and unalterable — save in one section, the passion narrative, though even here they did not hesitate to make some changes in order.

The thing about Chad is, like Gould and Jesus who are dead, his views can't change in response to any arguments or new information.

She views the task of the Obama administration and reproductive health advocates as notonly to «provide services to those who need them, but to change the minds and attitudes of those who can be responsible for delivering those services in countries around the world.»

The nature of religious television in America can be seen to be a function of the interaction of four main players; changes over the past decades have come about because of changes in the relative power and relationships of the four following players: (1) the regulatory agencies of the federal government, which, through the legislative process, provide the structure within which interaction inside the television industry takes place; (2) the television industry, primarily network and local station managements, which control the airwaves within the legislated structure; (3) the viewing public, which selects what it is that will be watched; and (4) the religious broadcasters who provide the material for broadcasts.

Anyway, despite all the confusion about pre-millenialism, a-millenialism, post-millenialism, the recent invention of the rapture, Paul's confusing statement about «we who remain», the entire book of Revelation not appearing to be written by John because of the Greek used, and the odd way in which eschatological views seem to change in the New Testament Pauline letters, and the bizarrely easy way people like Thessalonians became convinced Christ had already returned in their time, and all the other confusing things about New Testament prophecy — the truth is that it is all trustworthy and you should not question this.

There may also be a reference to the Jewish leaders, whether in Jesus» time or later, who viewed their function only as preserving the law rather than bringing about change.

The Mormon Church also changed its views on Polygamy when it became politically expedient to do so, and guess who told them it was time to change?

Then in the early 1950s, he met Nancy who was a Republican and his views changed to match hers.

Yep you are right, I moved down here in the state of Mississippi, north of Crystal Springs from Chicago when I was ten years old but still I visit once in a while, now it's twenty years and sad to not much has change, like the parts you said about non-whites discrimatory or rasicts at other non-whites, when I went to school here they treated me as a alien from another galaxy, they pick at my voice cause I didn't had that southern dialog, unlike them I said my words correctly, but not just me, they even hated at others who had better intelect I am not picking at them, It is what I went through all these years, Mississippi and mainly this small town of Crystal Springs see America in a crazy awful view, They don't like difference that even within they own race, ther not that politcal, when some one say God they got there vote, I don't to say much to waste your time, I still remember when I was ten years old I had a constanct back ground check on me to see were I really come from evn though I had the paper saying Chicago Illinois barely no jobs but a church on every street for a town barely under five Thousand, till this very day, they look at me like I am a alien, did you ever had that experiance down here damn my keybroad mess up,

Now it's not just liberal clergy (who have never been too keen on Scripture anyway) but an increasing number of «evangelicals» who are changing their view.

Uh, no one is suggesting they can't express their view - say you don't believe in Christ, but don't attempt to change the whole meaning by interrupting those who do and stating they are silly or ignorant.

Now, this does not necessarily mean everyone who voted for Donald Trump changed their views about character.

But, it said, «Service members will not be required to change their personal views and religious beliefs; they must, however, continue to respect and serve with others who hold different views and beliefs.»

The only one who can not is Lucifer because he do not want to, God heart is not made of iron, if there are evil people alive in this world it is only because God want them to repent to, there are most evil people who as a children or teenager was sweet but because of another being became evil, Only God know what it did make them change or their pain but only one things is sure as God he did have the first seat to see all their pain and live, and to my point of view as a Father it is by no means lesser than the pain he did feel for them or them victimes, like a electric chair.

I don't expect a one - hour conversation to change the mind of those who come on to defend a particular view.

Jonathan Westphal, with his view of the importance of contrasts and changing contexts in the visual perception of colour, and Margaret Masterman with her view of a reiterative flow in the auditory perception of spoken speech, were the two who were able to connect most closely with Whitehead's conception of sense - awareness of the patterned flow in the passage of nature.

«what makes them divine is your view of them» = > no, what makes them Divine is their power to change lives, drive a dominate World View (yes this is still the dominate world view), demand response by everyone (including you) to declare «who do you say I AM», accounting of things that can not be seen, forgiveness of sin, salvation, removes the sting of death, transforms perspective and reveals the wonder of view of them» = > no, what makes them Divine is their power to change lives, drive a dominate World View (yes this is still the dominate world view), demand response by everyone (including you) to declare «who do you say I AM», accounting of things that can not be seen, forgiveness of sin, salvation, removes the sting of death, transforms perspective and reveals the wonder of View (yes this is still the dominate world view), demand response by everyone (including you) to declare «who do you say I AM», accounting of things that can not be seen, forgiveness of sin, salvation, removes the sting of death, transforms perspective and reveals the wonder of view), demand response by everyone (including you) to declare «who do you say I AM», accounting of things that can not be seen, forgiveness of sin, salvation, removes the sting of death, transforms perspective and reveals the wonder of God.