Sentences with phrase «who claimed the points»

He also dismissed those who claimed the points he has in mind are too far apart to be connected by a bridge.

I called AMEX Membership Rewards again today, March 21, and the rep checked with a supervisor, who claimed Points Advance is not going away.

Not exact matches

The right thing to do when confronted with a mistake is to own up to it, not to make a series of bizarre claims in defense then insult the profession of the people who correctly pointed out the error.

There, I meet Louis, a garrulous 22 - year - old from New Haven who claims to have mastered wrapping flowers to the point of ennui.

(At this point, it's also worth noting that Facebook's claims about the effectiveness of Free Basics as a development tool in India are highly debatable — the vast majority of those who took up the offer were existing Internet users who wanted some free data, and it seems a very small number of genuinely new users actually graduated to the world of paid - for Internet access.

And while Reddit told CNN Money that it «provides fair market salaries» to all employees, skeptics point out that most companies will make this claim to employees, who are generally forced to take them at their word.

He himself claimed to be» «an old school point and click prop trader» who had «always been good with reflexes and doing things quick,»» and the «Layering Algorithm» that he used was a customized version of «a program that allowed non-programmers to engage in automated trading using spreadsheet commands and functions.»

A few times during the session Kogan made a point of arguing that data audits are essentially useless for catching bad actors — claiming that anyone who wants to misuse data can simply put a copy on a hard drive and «store it under the mattress».

«At one point, Levandowski said that he asked Brian McClendon, who left Google to join Uber, how much Uber would be willing to pay for the Chauffeur team, claiming he wanted to have a market value for the team.»

De Galhau: We «Should Work On» Exchanges Speaking at the City Week banking conference in London April 24, de Galhau, who has gone on record to make some curious claims about cryptocurrency in the past, appeared to choose the industry as a specific point of interest.

his whole point was that those who * feign * humility in claiming «no one can make such exclusive claims» are actually DOING the very thing to which they're objecting.

hellbent in my point of it is you who makes the extraordinary claim.

So, you blame your mistake on the person who pointed it out to you by claiming that the person who pointed it out, and a whole bunch of others, has ADD?

If as you say you have talked to others who claim to be Atheist the way you describe it then they are IDIOTS who also don't understand Atheism and yes at that point since they are claiming «no God» to be true, then by all means call their point of view a «religion».

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

Yes, they must always apend «credible» and then they get to decide who is credible, just like they point fingers at each other and claim «he's not a True Christian.»

First, at no point did I claim that «any» atheist who commits evil does so «because» of their atheism.

Exactly my point; if according to the Bible and Christ's words himself — that even the Son of God has no idea about the 2nd coming; I am now supposed to believe what men on earth say??!!!!! Seriously, how stupid are some people — these are the same people who claim they are religious elite!

There's a difference between judging others (which leads to condemnation, unfair treatment, cursing, sin, etc) versus pointing out who's a false prophet (which prevents believers from following those who claim to be man of God).

I have yet to meet anyone who claims to have been convinced that what the Bible says is true, or who claims to have been convinced about the correctness of a particular interpretation of any Biblical passage by someone who wanted to argue those points.

MyMainMan, one other point I'd like to make: If you're going to support Sagan's claim that athiests must presume to have much more knowledge than the rest of us, then the exact same must apply to Theists (those who believe in God).

Point is, the people who claim that the date has been found and the people who claim that it can not be found are quoting from the very same Bible.

I would point out however... that it is you who is claiming an absolute definition for the word so, perhaps while you wait for my «exegetical evidence», you might provide a little of your own substantiating your usage of the term?

Reinforcing in advance the claim I have put forth at the end of Part Two, Hartshorne went on to point out: «Just as the Stoics said the ideal was to have good will toward all but not in such fashion as to depend in any [221] degree for happiness upon their fortunes or misfortunes, so Christian theologians, who scarcely accepted this idea in their ethics, nevertheless adhered to it in characterizing God.»

The pity is it has been bastardized by people who've laid claim to the person and message of Jesus and used it to further the agenda of their flesh, thereby missing the point entirely..........

Those who hold this view point out that after the Pharisees claim that Jesus is performing miracles by the power of Satan (Matt 12:24), Jesus calls them an «evil generation» which deserves condemnation for rejecting the Messiah (Matt 12:39 - 42).

observer The point remains you are wrong and unwilling to learn, you are the one who made the false as.sumptions and still are not bright enough to realize that your wild claims are not substantiated in the original text.

A final point is that if Judas was simply another side of Jesus as you claim, how could Satan inhabit the body and soul of the Son of God who is also God Himself?

He's simply pointing out inconsistencies among those who claim to follow Jesus yet don't follow all his teachings.

How can anyone say they believe in God who created male and female above; and that God said that they should be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth — and claim that the same God has created them with a sexual orientation that makes it impossible for them to reproduce — ensuring no fruitfulness and multiplication which God commanded at point of creation?

For instance, in a discussion of apartheid, David Field remarks: «From a Christian point of view, it is important to examine the case for apartheid in some detail... because among its strongest supporters it numbers Christians who claim to have tested their attitudes and opinions by the standards of Scripture» (Free to Do Right [InterVarsity, 1976], p. 19).

To those who claim not to operate from that world view, it should be pointed out that an uncritical assumption of divine causality creates obstacles for communicating one's views to those who embrace the historical consciousness.

For those of you who are interested in reading the arch of a sad, sad bitter life, crusie through the remarks by «the son a Piper man» aka Tom Tom, Stands for nothing, hates everything, curses when left with nothing to say, then hysterically claims victory for hurting someone's feelings, and stands for nothing, but will gladly point out your poor syntax, grammar and spelling errors like a weary retired 3rd grade teacher.

The woman who kicked her out CLAIMED it was because of the dads, but at this point that is just an allegation.

Consequently, the analyst must change at some point from the consoler who takes the part of the patient against the world to the person who puts before the patient the claim of the world.

This point of view periodically gains strength before undergoing a counterattack from those who claim that capitalism is ordained by our faith and blessed by God.

Capital punishment's lack of demonstrated superiority as a deterrent (the evidence for its effectiveness being at best mixed), the capacity of society to protect itself equally well by permanently imprisoning those who are currently being executed (which is possible at limited marginal cost, especially when one takes into account the cost of the extended trial procedures and interminable appeals and reviews which usually accompany capital punishment)-- all these points are important, but their utility is chiefly as rebuttal arguments in response to the empirically weak but emotionally strong claims made on behalf of capital punishment.

But there are many who doubt the possibility of actualizing this kind of love and point to the self - deceit so often involved on the part of those who claim to do so.

I said that he was controversial, and that the people who DO believe those things about him can point to some pretty solid evidence to back up their claim.

At one point, about 10 years ago, the head of a Holocaust survivors group paid for her time to accumulate a list of 1,000 Holocaust victims who had been baptized, after the LDS Church claimed the Jewish community was «overreacting to the problem,» says Gary Mokotoff, a Jewish genealogist in New Jersey who has been following the issue for 22 years, long before it made headlines.

The point its that anyone who claims to know the will of god is ether insane or stupid.

It is written in the book of Dawkins 2:28 - 34 «Then shall the bearers of false witness claiming supernatural phenomenon and worshipers of deitys fall upon the righteous with their knives and swords, tearing my people apart who did nothing but point out that their God's did not exist.

It's a beautiful point, really: «What would my creation do to an innocent and harmless newcomer who just so happened to claim divinity?»

Underwood pointed out that, in the modern world, to claim to be a believer who loves God and neighbor, and yet not to attempt to be an effective person in the formation of just social policies, is to talk nonsense.

On this point there is considerable agreement in contemporary Protestant theology, even among those who claim to reject all philosophic approach to the knowledge of God.

Here was Alyssa Rosenberg at the Washington Post claiming that the whole point of Wonder Woman is that she's a role model for prepubescent girls, a kind of «Fearless Girl» avant la statue: «[T] he movie... argues that it's... little girls all over the world who stand to gain if they can grow up free of the distorting influence of misogyny,» Rosenberg wrote, with a schoolmarm's didacticism.

Von Campenhausen believes that if the story were simply a legend «it would not have specified three women (who, by Jewish law, were not competent to testify) as the decisive witnesses ’25 and he is supported at this point by H. H. Rex who claimed that «This is in itself a point in favor of the authenticity of the tradition.

I want to weep when there's a disaster and people are hurt or die and some self - described Christian personality claims that God made it happen to punish X because of Y. Unfortunately there are people who are gullible enough to believe such drivel to the point of sending the drivel masters money so they can continue to spout their nonsense.

Pointing to the divine act of deliverance in the Exodus, we claim that God is a liberating God who has a preferential bias toward the poor and oppressed.

The point is that people who claim to follow both Ayn Rand and Christ are hypocrites.