Cosmology theory, by default, defines God as an Existent God, a perverse mega-creature,
who created evil in the universe so we can step right into the trap.
First, who would want to live forever with a god
who creates evil (Isaiah 45:7) and has the power to destroy evil (including that satan thingie), wonky weather, cancer, pain, suffering, famine, etc., yet chooses not to?
And he would like to honor
those who created Evil Islands.
Not exact matches
Wouldn't a god
who admits to
creating evil, have to be
evil?
let alone the god they present, one
who could have
created any kind of world he wanted, like an author
who has complete control over what shows up in a fictional work; why would god then giddily
create / allow so much pain and
evil?
What kind of azzhole of
created being would be so ungrateful to the one
who created him, to rebel and denounce his creator, and then call Him
evil when He demands justice?
@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their
evil intent, but the God
who has
created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those
who would reject Him.
If Warfield is not concerned with Catholicism, then why in his discussion of the kind of «faith healing» promoted by men like A. J. Gordon does he claim that it
creates a class of «professionals»
who stand between the soul and God and that «from this germ the whole sacerdotal
evil has grown»?
As creatures
created inherently inferior from a male's rib to server males» needs, but
who are
evil to core for forcing Original sin on humanity and forever barring us from Eden.
But if (5) is true, then it appears that God could have
created a world inhabited by free creatures
who perform moral good but no moral
evil.
Observer, you can call God «Zeus», if you regard Him as our eternal infinite Holy Creator and Judge,
who created all and will continue to
create, whose purity requires purity to dwell with Him, whose love within overflowed to
create man in His image with free will,
who permitted rebellion for the purpose of destroying
evil, and
who surrendered His Son to allow us to use our free will to glorify Him and enjoy Him forever.
In this kind of theodicy Gethesemane, the cross, and the resurrection are important foci for understanding the depths of God's love,
who, in
creating an unimaginatively complex matrix of matter eventuating finally in persons able to choose to go against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the
evil that its human creatures inflict upon it.
Not to mention every verse in the Bible that asserts that God is in control of the universe, that he is the one
who is responsible for unbelief as well as belief, that he
created both good AND
EVIL, would be wrong, meaning the Bible would be fallible, meaning that the validity of everything else inside it would be called into question as well.
A God
who creates humans
who by definition must be
evil because t hey are not God.
Hart,
who next year will be a visiting professor at Providence College, spoke with us about
evil and its place in the world that God
created and loves.
Christians believe, from the ones I talk to
who seem to be true believers and not cultural Christians, that God never desired or planned
evil, he just uses the
evil man
creates for his purposes.
xlv, 7): «
Who makes peace and
creates evil, I YHVH do all this.»
They can't see the basic human psychology in stories about a being (or beings)
who have power over good and
evil,
who has the ability to give ot take life, to forgive or to condemn, to
create heaven or hell.
But finally, we are also to be
who God
created us to be, unmarred by this
evil age, the world, Adam's sin or our own sin.
I might believe that the woman
who claims to be my mother is in fact my aunt, or that my physics textbook is a conspiracy of lies written by heliocentrists, or that the sense experiences I have are illusions
created by an
evil demon.
This word ברא, Barah which means «to finish,» was mistranslated as «
create» by the devil's followers, so that they could deceive People to falsely believe that the devil
who creates Darkness and
Evil is Yahweh, which is blasphemy against Holy Spirit Yahweh, to falsely claim that Yahweh
created Darkness and
Evil.
But your English Bibles were translated by Followers of the Devil
who blasphemed against Holy Spirit Yahweh, and mistranslated that as» I form the light, and
create darkness: I make peace, and
create evil: I the LORD do all these.»
Bloom traces the origin of values to Friedrich Nietzsche,
who preached the supremacy of the human will and its ability to
create good and
evil.
They admirably avoid the fundamental question that haunts Christian theology: if God
who wills to be involved has
created a world in which not even he can act in perfect blamelessness, how can God avoid the accusation of guilt — ultimate, primordial culpability for human suffering; culpability for that which we experience as
evil?
Or that maybe the philosophy of why God
created or allowed
Evil might just be there to find out
who are those of Faith and
who are those not of Faith.
Or handed down by god
who created mankind in his image through the treachery of a talking snake in a magical fruit tree
who disclosed knowledge of good and
evil.
There are some
who say the Bible shows a cycle where God
created the heaven and the earth, it was destroyed by
evil (battle in the principalities) leaving creation in a dark void.
Thus, as most FWTs see it, the relevant question is which of the following pictures of God is most appealing: (1) a God
who creates individuals
who only think they are free but are actually controlled by God and thus produce no
evil or (2) a God
who bestows actual freedom on individuals even though such freedom may produce (has produced) much
evil along with much good.
Also, if one would read Genesis - Malachi then one would know these question asked by Smithsonian, how we were
created, and why
evil came about, and to help, YHWH made us for His own sake unconditionally; He gave us a choice to decide with our own hearts what, or
who we want to be in this world, as well as to
who we'll be to HIM, whether being righteous, obedient children, or not the choice is ours we're responsible for our own righteousness in Ezekiel 14:14 - 21.
GOD,
who supposedly has the power over the universe, life and death, certainly doesn't need humans ro help Him gather up cash, followers or need help to beat
evil or to even
create heaven on Earth.
To say that the perfect being is a bi-polar schitzophrenic man
who created the source of
evil in the first place is rational but to say that in the billions of galaxies in existence and the billions of planets per galaxy that more than just ours has the potential to house life is crazy?
This could be poetic reference to an artist (creator God) simply washing off the canvas and starting over with Noah, a symbolic picture of how those
who believe in the Hebrew God of that day are carried away above the storms of life in the protective hands of God, symbolic of judgment for those not
created in the image of God, a narrative of why the Hebrew race is the chosen race, prophecy of end time judgment or literal in that the babies and people resulting from $ ex with the nephlium produced
evil beyond that imaginable and God was showing mercy.
If good parents are not
evil for deliberately bringing children into this world and inevitably having to discipline them in some fashion or another then neither is God (
who is better than any earthly parent could ever be) for
creating man.
They would know good and
evil as one
who creates both, i.e. not as something to do or not to do, but as two contradictory forms of being.
In the coming years, as today's young men and women take up their responsibilities and seek to make sense of the world, it will not be adequate if Catholics
who are worried - as we all ought to be - about the sexual mayhem that has been
created in recent years simply denounce the
evils of extreme feminism or even of the ghastly contraceptive, anti-life culture with which it has been associated.
The men
who wrote the book took the liberty to
create a something that was completely false and
evil.
Philosopher God is without sin that is his
who he is the evidence is that Jesus was like the father and he was without sin when God
created satan it wasnt with
evil intent just like us he had the choice to be obedient or to be disobedient to Gods word.He chose by his own volition to be disobedient and here we see the seeds of sin or lawlessness.
It seems very simple to me, God is demonstrating his intention to
create, allow people the opportunity to choose good or bad, allow the ones
who have chosen
evil to change their minds, and then ultimately, eliminate
evil and preserve good.
Only someone
who thought the West is the source of all
evil, or
who did no reading of foreign affairs whatsoever, could believe the anti-Isis bombing campaign
created the group it was intended to stop.
Oskar Schindler,
who swindles the Third Reich, and Amon Goeth,
who represents its pure
evil, are men
created by the opportunities of war.
But perhaps The Rock and Naomie Harris (Collateral Beauty, Moonlight)-- as Dr. Kate Caldwell, the scientist
who created the weaponized DNA before she realized the
evil purpose it would be put to — can stop the monsters and save George, too?
Hela, the
evil sister of the movie's God - of - Thunder hero, Thor (Chris Hemsworth), wants to take over the celestial realm of Asgard, stepping into the power vacuum
created by the absence of their father (Anthony Hopkins),
who, as the movie opens, appears to have been exiled to a senior - living facility on Midgard, a.k.a. Earth.
While «It» will likely
create some resentment by inspiring a new wave of
evil clown sightings nationwide, it should also be appreciated by anyone
who wants good scares depicted with class.
Not much is known about this character, but SEGA says, «Infinite joins Eggman's
evil group of henchmen in Sonic Forces which includes Chaos, Metal Sonic, Shadow and Zavok
who have already taken over the world and are ready to
create more next - level panic and disorder.»
Sonic Forces puts players in a world already taken over by Dr. Eggman and his
evil group of henchmen, which includes Chaos, Metal Sonic, Shadow and Zavok
who are ready to
create next - level panic and disorder.
O'Kane,
who also worked on Ash vs
Evil Dead and the upcoming The Meg, not only
created the demonic Deadite look, but had to layer on the injuries as the film progressed.
The robotic child soon discovers his nature and escapes the floating city, where he finds new friends on the surface and must eventually battle the
evil president of Metro City
who has harnessed negative energy to
create a robot warrior.
I'm not sure
who created the art, but Bruce Campbell tweeted a hilarious new one - sheet for
Evil Dead, which boasts «If...
Dr. Robotnik (I'll never call him Eggman, and neither should you) has cooked up a new baddie called Infinite,
who uses an all - powerful McGuffin called the Phantom Ruby to
create clones, banish people to other dimensions, and do other poorly - defined
evil things.
Back in 2009, writer Joe Kelly and illustrator Ken Niimura partnered together to
create the graphic novel I Kill Giants, a sprawling adventure about loner kid Barbara Thorson,
who retreats into a magical world to fight
evil giants that may or may not all be in her head.