Sentences with phrase «who disagree»

For those of you who disagree just go an listen to his post 9/11 sermon where he says GD America multiple times and says our chickens have come home to rooste.

People who disagree with the treatment of animals do not do so becuase of their atheism.

However, I'm glad I live in a country where people who disagree can both put up a billboard.

What we see, however, is a different kind of mud - slinging and those who disagree with some individual's (any's) interpretation, will be branded as «unkind».

We hold no disdain towards those who disagree, but only battle against the trend or reality in area's of the Globe where sharing the Gospel, or living out our Faith publicly is being restricted, or is currently very restricted or illegal.

But when a commencement speaker gives her address without any opportunity for those who disagree with her to talk back, the only avenue left is protest, either before the speech or on its occasion.

Those who disagree with them, as do I, need to wrestle with them theologically.

I am not challenging Steve's faith, but rather the assertion that he KNOWS his beliefs are «truth» and «reality» and that those of us who disagree with him are wrong.

The message is clear: those who disagree with the prevailing opinion of the mob are to be drowned out — or perhaps just drowned.

We have forgotten how to extend grace to our brothers and sisters who disagree with us on (admittedly important) issues.

Our liberal establishment does not engage with those who disagree.

Unlike Christians, you have no respect for those who disagree with your views.

i am a christian i and respect those who disagree with me because it is the right and moral thing to do and my religion demands it.

Anyone that tells you that «science» says the Earth is 6 billion years old has forgotten to tell you than there are many credible scientists who disagree and there are many discrepancies in the dating methods.

These can not be explained by those who disagree with the Book of Mormon.

You may recall that ours was a somewhat critical treatment of Father Richard McCormick's slash - and - burn attack on all and sundry who disagree with his interpretation of John Paul II's encyclical, Veritatis Splendor.

correctlycenter You're standing on the safe side, while those who disagree with you are doomed, according to your «Christian» judgment of that passage, correct?

Childs has decisively altered the way in which interpreters like myself, who are situated in the church, do interpretation; moreover, even those who disagree with his perspective, sometimes vociferously, must struggle with the questions upon which he has insisted and the perspective he has legitimated by the power of his argument.

You, however, appear steadfast in you faith, in your absolute certainty that you are right and that people who disagree with you are damned.

Paul's point in putting it this way is not to give us a book of theological trump cards by which we can denounce as heretics all who disagree with us.

When you must resort to making inane claims that those who disagree with you actually know you are right... you have totally lost all claim to intelligent discourse.

I guess if you don't have a rational argument you can only threaten people who disagree with you.

Unsurprisingly, theologians who disagree with Wright tread cautiously when they take him on.

We can speak kindly to those who disagree with us.

In the end, I can't argue any point by saying «I am right, because people who agree with me have a statistically significant tendency to be more intelligent than people who disagree».

The interviewee says that he has friends who disagree with him, but he does not consider them all to be bigoted.

It is to be feared that those who disagree with that proposition do not really care about human rights at all.

And like any other lunatic, the fanatic will rarely understand or recognize his own dementia, a fact which only further distances himself from those who disagree — «It is they who are crazy!»

But if we condemn those who disagree with us as «heretics,» or if we smugly think that their disagreement with us is «persecution for our faith» which therefore proves our view is correct, we will never grow in unity with one another, and we will never learn to see our own doctrinal and theological missteps.

this is my understanding as well... but there is no room for the truth, only I am right and you are wrong... and I might have to kill those who disagree with my religion.

I think most of you who disagree with the author are ignoring the truth and believing in something you want to believe in.

Even though while we become more egalitarian those who disagree become more extreme, I have to trust that at some point this polarization will become an embarrassment to all of us.

Unlike you however I am not angry at or frustrated by those who disagree with me, because, like you I can not prove you are wrong and I am not going to waste my time trying, nor am I going to call you names and say you are closed minded in your conviction that science can answer all questions, in time.

I might privately believe that my position was the «only» truly Christian one, and I might publicly do all I could to persuade people of its truth, but I would be unjustified in seeking to unchurch or to deny the name of Christian to those who disagree with me.

Calvinists have also been known to use this verse against other Christians who disagree with the Calvinistic teachings and doctrines.

It seems that the majority of the people who comment agree, but there are the occasional ones who disagree.

True tolerance, says Keller, is revealed by how our convictions lead us to treat people who disagree with us.

They even go so far as to say that those who disagree with them, i.e., do not accept christ, will be sent to hell for eternity.

Even those who disagree with the outcome respect it.

Sometimes even by others who disagree with our hypothesis.

Since the logic of relations is neutral between these competing views about the metaphysics of nexus, my hope is that those who disagree with my interpretation will still find the second part helpful.

He deems unfit to live in his state those who disagree with his fervent, indeed fanatical, embrace of the most extreme form of the abortion license.

So your idea of tolerance is to not tolerate those who disagree with you wow is that progressive there are people in this world who think differently and the inability to not express ones views because of pc bs is the problem In this country

As long as you can demonize those who disagree with you, you can ignore anything they say and refuse to compromise.

Kaufman is unafraid to be — to use two of his favorite adjectives — both human and humane, honest about both his caution and his passions, and in that he provides even those of us who disagree with him with an admirable model of how to be a theologian.

kermit so faith is no longer required... funny, there are many who disagree with you.

What he means by that, bucky, is that unless everyone agrees with his religious beliefs, he and those who «think» like him perfectly prepared to use violence again those who disagree...

You are merely showing your intolerance to differing views, by calling those who disagree with you as hateful and evil.

Of course, not all advocates of same - sex marriage call those who disagree bigots, homophobes, or haters.

«beheaded those who disagree with you».