Not exact matches
The novel order, issued last month by a state judge in California, has alarmed some publishers,
who fear it could deter scientists from agreeing to review
draft manuscripts.
«The concept of «blue carbon» has focused scientists and stakeholders on the tremendous potential of managing marine ecosystems for climate mitigation,» said Patrick Megonigal, associate director for research at the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center,
who reviewed an early
draft of the
manuscript but was not directly involved in the work.
A book doctor is someone
who performs developmental or content editing on your
manuscript, usually after you have a completed
draft.
Beta readers are volunteers
who will read a finished
draft of your
manuscript and provide you feedback so you can make improvements before you move forward with editing.
At Author Secret, we offer two different kinds of content editing for authors
who have already finished the first
draft of their novels: the
manuscript assessment and developmental editing.
The truth is this: although first
drafts will be much better after they are professionally edited, nine out of ten (or ten out of ten) of those
manuscripts will remain unpublishable if they have been «edited» in a vacuum by professionals
who have never acquired a
manuscript at a Big Five publishing house; never negotiated an author / agent book contract; and never published, marketed and sold a finished book.
Or you can send out your
manuscript between
drafts to a number of people you connect with as beta readers,
who are willing to read your book and offer feedback at whatever level you might find useful — from catching typos, to telling you the character with the Southern accent just ain't cuttin» it.
There would be very few writers, I would argue,
who could produce even a semblance of a rough
draft manuscript of 30,000 or 40,000 words in a mere 40 hours.
So there comes to be writers
who quick
draft their
manuscripts and complete the journey of word one to publication in 3 to 6 months.
The authors are indebted to several anonymous reviewers
who provided insightful comments on
draft versions of the
manuscript.
I'm told (by a lawyer
who'd have reason to know) that the first time my apportionment text was mentioned in the SCC — the text was still in
draft (the parties had portions of the
manuscript) so that'll give you an idea of when it was — one of the judges on the bench was less than impressed that they'd been referred to a still in progress work by a living author.
I help writers
who have already written the sloppy first
draft but now need feedback as they rewrite, revise, and polish the
manuscript to the best of their ability.
We are grateful to the authors of the reviewed studies
who provided us with additional information about those studies and to the anonymous reviewers
who provided valuable feedback on an earlier
draft of this
manuscript.