Sentences with phrase «who gave the event»

The Globe and Mail's Sarah Milroy said «There are flashes of brilliance in the Montreal Biennale, thanks to a wild and woolly curator who gave the event a good shaking up.»

Not exact matches

The study found «that people who were asked to think about the past were willing to pay more for products than those who were asked to think about new or future memories; another experiment showed an increased willingness to give more money to others after recalling a nostalgic event.»

«You don't want to give the mom - and - pop shareholder who may not have seen the reports the ability to Google it,» Robertson says, speaking generally of how companies respond in such events.)

(Startups are not required but strongly encouraged to participate in group events, given the fast pace of the two - month program, according to Adam Klein, who helped launch Startup Stampede.)

Coleman suggests that every time you give a speech, recognize that you have three audiences: the people sitting in the chairs listening to your message, the event coordinator who booked you to speak, and the people sponsoring the event.

Sandberg echoed the sentiments of Mark Zuckerberg, who also posted about Cambridge Analytica on Wednesday, giving readers a timeline of the events and outlining how he plans to tackle the situation.

In Seattle, pro-immigrant events are expected to give way to rowdier, anti-capitalist marches led by protesters who said they plan to shut down a major freeway through the city.

Since most politicians» campaigns are largely funded by wealthy companies and individuals, it would give voters a better sense of who the candidate they are voting for is actually representing if the company's logo, or individual's name, was prominently displayed upon the candidate's clothing at all public appearances and campaign events.

A recent study published in the Journal of Consumer Research found that people who were asked to think about the past were willing to pay more for products than those who were asked to think about new or future memories; another experiment showed an increased willingness to give more money to others after recalling a nostalgic event.

The Brazilians who did make it to the arena for more gymnastics were given a nice surprise — two medals in the men's floor event, from Diego Hypolito and Arthur Mariano who earned silver and bronze behind Britain's Max Whitlock.

And he hasn't shied away from high - profile events - last May (above), for example, he introduced Australian prime minister John Howard to members of the then Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, who had come to the Peninsula Hotel to hear Howard give a foreign policy address.

In addition, I would point out that equities are purchased and traded by private individuals, who inherently have time value of money and liquidity preferences that are also priced into equities, given their specific limitations and characteristics (e.g., in the event of a stock market crash, liquidity may disappear at the exact moment it is most desired, and therefore the risk of that lack of liquidity is priced into the equity).

CEO Levy, who had been scheduled to meet with investors yesterday and give a speech at a media conference organized by JPMorgan Chase & Co. in London, spoke instead via videoconference from a remote location, according to people with knowledge of the meeting, who asked not to be identified because the event wasn't public.

Our CEO Jeff Connally spoke during the event, talking to those on hand about the responsibility CMIT Solution has to give back to those who have sacrificed for our nation with jobs and business ownership opportunities.

First Lady Melania Trump tackled her first ever cyberbullying event on Tuesday, giving critics another chance to suggest that she's the last person who should be taking on such an initiative when her husband, President Donald Trump, continues to attack people on Twitter.

Rather, EVERYONE who attends the Summit, including the participants, can share their views, reviews & give feedback about the promising start - ups who will be showcasing their ideas at the event.

Nor does Copleston, who spent half the academic year at the Gregorian university in Rome prior to and during Vatican II, give us any insight into the intellectual ferment that shaped that decisive event in contemporary Catholic history.

@fimilleur from time to time mankind experiences the presence of God, there have been and continue to be events that testify to the presence of Him.The multiple gods you continually point to have an unique difference from the God who first revealed His presence to ancient men i.e. the Hebrews.The particular gods you mention roman etc. are all man made and in many instances men themselves i.e. hercules, but even the ancient greeks realized the limitations of their understanding and included an «unknown» God in their worship structure.many cultures did likewise, having a glimpse of God but not the fullness of understanding that was given to the Jews.Whether or not «we» believe, does not alter the fact that God exists as an unique being, whether or not «we» acknowledge Him «we» will stand before Him.You do not choose to understand, but we are actually standing in His presence right now as He is much bigger than the doctrines and knowledge man ascribes to Him those things you find so questionable are the misconceptions and misrepresentations of God made by men throughout history.

Although there are undoubtedly dogmatic historians who reject miracles out of hand, an intellectually sophisticated historian would never claim that miracles can not happen but only that the historian, as historian, is never able to claim that a given event is supernaturally caused.

Rather, it is a means of giving comfort to those who will go through events that they can recognise in retrospect.

The event, a simple talk based on the book, rounded off with a Q&A, was mainly populated by younger Christians who gave Bell a long round of applause at the end of the night.

Only someone who overlooks the fact that this answer itself has a real history which is a history of the reality reflected on as well as of the reflection itself, can think that the Church with its principles, because they too can be given concrete form, is always able to follow directly on the heels of what is new in the changing course of history and that only by its own fault and failure could the Church lag behind events in its theological reflection on morals.

But there's no reason why those who aren't observant Christians should not approach Christmas purely as a gift - giving, feast - eating and under - the - mistletoe event.

To the person who heard that word of wisdom as with all words of prophecy I would encourage you to bring it to God and see what he says - sometimes people get things wrong but also sometimes the words given can be about events not now but to come

I can either express this directly by using an expression like «momentary selves,» supplemented by a speculative device designed to give some sort of unity to the otherwise unacceptable implication of a crumbling of each «momentary self» into a dust of pure momentary «events,» or I can go the way of many neurologists who see the «momentary self» as the result of successive integrations of the nervous system in its constant reactions to internal and external stimuli.

9:3 points out that this entire chapter is about a single event 9:4 clearly states that any non-Muslim who isn't currently at war with the Muslims during said event and those who have agreements with the Muslims are exempt 9:6 states that even among those that they were fighting, if any seeks protection from the Muslims they are to give it to them The rest of the chapter is a continuim of theological ideals and prounouncements.

But it was 24 - year - old former child pop sensation Justin Bieber who gave the clearest articulation of the Christian message at the event.

This is going to be a shock — the men who actually wrote all the parts in the Bible and made changes to the infrastructure of Christianity — including Constantine circa 300 AD in Rome — were not afraid of unleashing the occasional metaphor... in other words the Bible is not entirely literal — no, you are supposed to use your imagination... In many cases the disciples didn't actually witness an event — it was long distance and time altered hearsay — God figured Man could handle that... So don't be afraid to dilute - God's cool with that — as long as you do the right thing in life — feed the poor, help your neighbor, don't kill or covet - just be a good and decent person - smile, love and give generously... God doesn't need robots — He wants thoughtful individuals who help!!!

The natural scientists, especially the elite group who are members of the National Association of Scientists, have taken Einstein's advice that a personal God could not intervene in a world of «ordered regularity of all events» and that «religion should give up a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings.»

Many since Kant have doubted whether God, who gave us language, actually uses language to communicate with uswhether, that is, God's «speaking» to people is a cognitive event for them as my speaking to you would be, or whether this «speaking» is a metaphor for some non-cognitive way in which we are made aware of his presence.

If the meaning of our principle of historical aetiology, as opposed to an eye - witness report by someone who was himself present at the event, has been understood, we presumably also possess a criterion for judging what was correct in the description given by traditional theology of the blessed, supernatural, original condition of man, as opposed to what was a simplified projection into the past, into human beginnings, of the state of man as it ought to be and will be in the future.

The new event is the birth, life, death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus: the interpretation of this new event, which takes up the old interpretation into itself in a reinterpretation, is that Jesus is the Christ, who gives his people rest from the bondage of sin, a final rest the Israelites could not obtain under Joshua when he brought them into Canaan.28

The Israelite who did not joyfully rest from his work on that day was one who put his hope in his own work rather than in God's election.22 According to de Quervain,»... when our minds are illumined by faith, we see the Sabbath in Israel as grounded not in a sociological event, but in a theological one, the deliverance of God's people from bondage into the rest which he gave them as a token of the final rest.

And so I in my turn, your Excellency, as one who has gone over the whole course of these events in detail, have decided to write a connected narrative for you, so as to give you authentic knowledge about the matters of which you have been informed.1

It is not true that only defenders of strict identity can explain the persistence of character traits, whereas event pluralists who defend nonstrict identity can only give grudging recognition to these traits.

This freedom which is Christ and which he gives is appropriated by the man who obeys the call to this freedom in faith and through the baptism which is its expression, submitting himself to the event that opens the prison of the world; namely the incarnation, death and resurrection of the Son.

In the event of war we must be prepared to face an army of millions of well equipped soldiers who will be convinced (from our standpoint, wrongly) of the righteousness of their cause and who will be prepared to give everything in the battle against the «criminals» (they mean us).

For those who have defended the traditional interpretation of the resurrection of Jesus as an historical event involving the raising and removal of a physical body, that which has carried most weight is simply the fact that, on a plain reading of the New Testament, the Bible itself seems to give unqualified support to such a view, in some places if not in all.

In other words, though God may order the events which allows a person to hear the message of the Gospel, and while God gives eternal life and confers the status of sonship to those who do believe, God does not force anyone to believe or restrict others from doing so.

This is such a huge subject that I must beg indulgence, therefore, if I give my space to but a small fraction of the historic faith — namely its main emphases on God, Christ, the Church, and eternal life — and consider only these in our modem context, in the effort to discover what values they may have for men and women who are tossed about in an unsettled world, with an uncertain future, and doomed — almost certainly it seems — to a doubtful truce of arms, at worst to a war which threatens to annihilate man as we have known him and in any event to leave us a bare existence such as we can eke out on a totally devastated planet.

Given the profile and the foreseeable impact of the event, and given the quality of the opposing speakers, we may ask, were the Catholic parties who did volunteer to stand up for Christ in public given any support, coaching or preparation before the eGiven the profile and the foreseeable impact of the event, and given the quality of the opposing speakers, we may ask, were the Catholic parties who did volunteer to stand up for Christ in public given any support, coaching or preparation before the egiven the quality of the opposing speakers, we may ask, were the Catholic parties who did volunteer to stand up for Christ in public given any support, coaching or preparation before the egiven any support, coaching or preparation before the event?

It is hardly necessary to state here what process thought has to say; and, in any event, I can refer those who do not know about it to a recent small book of my own, entitled Process Thought and Christian Faith (Macmillan, New York, and Nisbet, London, 1968), in which I attempted to give a brief sketch of that conceptuality with special reference to its availability for the enterprise of Christian re-conception.

«Given that the express goal of this event is evangelism, with the commitment of new believers to Christ, we do not believe that Rev. Graham... should be the exemplar that impresses itself on these new believers,» wrote four evangelical pastors and a Catholic leader who were invited to endorse the March 3 — 5 event, but opposed Graham's place as keynote speaker.

The speaker at this event was Liz Carr, the disabled star of «Silent Witness», who as a stand - up comedienne gave a powerful speech against assisted suicide.

Given current events in Canada, those who have assured themselves that such horrible things could never happen here may be in for a nasty awakening, for Canada's culture closely reflects our own.

Sadly you also throw around the term «child abuse» with a cavalier looseness that suggests you don't have the foggiest idea what child abuse is... it's a shame abused children everywhere can't write in and tell you about their trevails at the hands of an abuser... Jesus Christ was no abuser... if I'm wrong about Jesus, he was at least a Rabbi who loved his followers, and who taught, peace, compassion, forgiveness, and inclusiveness... If I'm right, Jesus is the most amazing, wonderful gift GOD could ever give to his beloved creation... in either event, belief in him, and sharing those beliefs with children is not abuse, it's loving and nurturing fact based belief, not mythology...

- Actually, the James Randi Foundation will give a one - million - dollar prize to anyone who can show, under proper observing conditions, evidence of any paranormal, supernatural, or occult power or event.

His claim was supported by Archbishop Issam John Darwish, Melkite bishop of Zahle, in Lebanon, who was one of four speakers invited to the charity's event at the House of Lords to give personal accounts of Christian persecution in their countries.

His role, it seems to me, is essentially that of a sentinel (Ezekiel chapter 33) who foresees approaching events and gives warning before the situation reaches the pitch of tragedy, takes on a massive character or becomes the focus of passions.

Moreover, if we are to accept the account of the deliverance at the Red Sea given by the J document, this central event of Israel's faith was the act of a nature - god who sent a wind and drove back the waters.