Sentences with phrase «who gets the most benefit»

This is the top - of - the - line Delta SkyMiles card for frequent business travelers who get the most benefits when flying on Delta.

This correction, though drastic for those who got the most benefits until yesterday, was overdue and necessary.

People who get the most benefit from coaching understand that they'll be engaged in activity during and between sessions.

You can also agree to change your agreement depending on who gets the most benefit from the deduction.

Not exact matches

«Going forward, our intent is not to profit from Meta's data and capabilities,» Meta CEO Sam Molyneux said in a statement, «instead we aim to ensure they get to those who need them most, across sectors and as quickly as possible, for the benefit of the world.»

«Most of the changes have been about redistributing who pays how much and what benefits get paid for, rather than driving down overall health care costs.»

Roth IRAs are getting more popular as a savings vehicle but still overlooked by many who may benefit from them the most.

Despite being one of the most expensive tax breaks, costing the country — mostly the renters, who don't get the benefit — $ 77 billion in 2016, Trump and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin will face massive blowback should they pursue this policy.

Who do I get the most benefit for?»

Most likely that would come from taxes on those who were also working, which would erase any benefit that they got and act as a disincentive for many to work (opponents to the UBI in Switzerland made that case, suggesting it would lead to a flat out shortage of workers).

Hilarious that most of you are rednecks who get welfare and other public benefits but are the first to scourge (look it up) the liberal thinking.

We've observed before that a super mobile forward who gets shots away a half second earlier than OG would benefit our team significantly, but most of the people attacking Giroud don't actually know why they're doing it, lol.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

even when he suffered a serious knee injury, instead of accepting the fact that he would never stick his legs into the spaces that were crucial for someone with straight ahead speed to succeed, the club actually contemplated giving him a chance to play up top where his lack of physicality, size and holding up play talents would been on display for all to see... these are not the actions of a club that really cares about winning at the highest levels, but they are the actions of a club that wasn't interested in spending the necessary resources to purchases a world - class striker, which is usually the most expensive position on the pitch... instead we adopted the horrible phrase «like a new signing» and proceeded to allow this ridiculous experiment to carry on, which ultimately caused some discomfort on the training pitch and inside the locker room as players battled for a position that shouldn't have been theirs for the taking in the first place... don't get me wrong, I believe that Walcott is a talented player, who can help a team reach their goals, if their goals are relatively modest... just look at the teams who supposedly expressed interest in his services and they weren't the kind of clubs who aspire to win at the highest levels... as for the reasons why he hasn't been bitching and moaning about moving on just look at the wage benefits he receives from our club and his obvious desire to enjoy the societal advantages that come with playing in North London for a club with worldwide appeal... so instead of continuing to try to fix a coat with a broken zipper simply move on and buy a new and better coat

But most of all, it's exercise in disguise, which benefits the wellbeing of those who would sometimes may rather not get moving.

People who use the body pillows get most benefits of side sleeping.

«We need the parents of the people who are going to benefit most from this referendum — the kids — to get out and vote,» said board member Tom Reese.

... the families getting # 80, # 90, # 100,000 a year to live in homes that most people who pay the taxes towards those benefits could not possibly afford.

She added: «Almost two million older people struggle on the breadline in a life of poverty, but still government ministers trumpet a benefit scheme which simply isn't getting help to those who need it most.»

Apparently labour introduced an increase of pension age to 65 in 1995 but failed to inform the women of the 50's who would be most directly affected, the government failed its legal duty to inform all women personally of this change, they tried to get away with this by stating they didn't have any current details, except they forget that they have all details from PAYE, us women still received all our NI demands and self - assessments as well as any tax or child benefit details, so they do have out details, they just failed to carry out this legal action.

Not that I'm predicting a Paul presidency; the same factors I talked about back in June still apply (for instance, I can't see the majority of Americans voting for a guy who'd do his best to get rid of Social Security, Medicare and most of the rest of the government benefits and protections average citizens enjoy).

This, along with other help specifically for poor people, such as food stamps and health - care benefits, goes to the people who need it most and not to anyone who happens to get a minimum - wage job.

«Our job is to make sure that those people who can benefit the most from these programs know about these programs, and are targeted» to get them involved,» Suffolk County District Attorney Timothy Sini said.

So combine the fact that two extremely important laws, laws that have billions of dollars wrapped up in them, expire next year with the fact that Republican control of the state Senate is doomed and you get the players who stand to benefit the most from this confluence of events throwing enormous piles of money at maintaining Republican control long enough to get what they want.

Though if you force me to pick who could benefit most, it's probably de Blasio: He and Stringer had the most philosophical overlap, and with Quinn and Thompson known commodities, de Blasio is now likely to get more media and voter attention as a fresh alternative.

And then there is the much bigger rump that could not get access to good schools (down under Labour), good apprenticeships / sponsoring companies, also down under Labour and lastly betrayed by a Labour Govt that seems to think spending vast amounts of money on snooping campaigns to catch benefit cheats is a better investment than educating and reskilling the un-employed, who on going out to do the jobs that must be done find themselves up against foreign labour sometimes willing to work the most brutal conditions (and maybe less than min wage because it is still better than home).

«The businesses that will be under the most pressure, paying a significantly higher minimum wage - 6 % higher on average every year in this parliament - aren't the same businesses as a whole who will get the benefit from the tax reductions.»

«So many of our patients get rhinovirus, but most of the infections are mild and we want to know who would likely benefit from any potential therapies,» Waghmare said.

I've talked to friends who have been «floating» for months or years and they all confirmed that the first time is the most difficult and that the benefits get better with each session.

Anyone who frequently get sick with colds, flu, migraines, experiences nausea, constipation or diarrhea will most certainly benefit from cleansing.

Women with heavy periods benefit too, I just haven't seen that as much because most women who try it are trying to get their period back or back to being regular.

However, the formula is strong enough so that most women who will get benefits should expect them in the first month of use.

Studies suggest that it's fast metabolizers who get the most health benefits from drinking caffeinated beverages and that slow metabolizers should drink coffee with caution and not consume more than two cups daily.

If you want to play it safe, take your caffeine and creatine separately, which is a moot point for most of us who take caffeine before workouts and creatine after (which is what you should be doing to get the most benefit from both).

* Ethyl Ester is perfect for anyone who is looking for the traditional benefits of monohydrate but is also concerned with a lean appearance and getting the most bang for their buck.

Whatever the reason, we need to find a way to get PrEP to the people who can most benefit,» Raifman said in a Hopkins news release.

Those who had a gene that increases Alzheimer's risk saw memory improve — and those with the most insulin resistance got the biggest benefits.4

It provides with both stitched and sunstitched dresses that are a benefit for the ladies who most of the time don't like the stitched ranges and prefer to get the stitching done according to their fit size and choice.

But Hedlund, who portrays wild man Dean Moriarty in the film, wasn't complaining: «Not being in such a rush, we got to see some of the most beautiful lands that all the impatient people don't get to see these days and that was a benefit for us.»

He's a manager turned caretaker, the sort of person who can't help but get tangled up in the lives of others.It seems likely he'll get the most benefit out of any awards push, as people are more apt to vote for someone they know (and Dafoe's never won an Academy Award), and he's certainly deserving of praise as much as Prince and Vinaite are.

With the direct link between Pupil Premium funding for your school and registration for free school meals, this course is invaluable if you want to secure additional funding for your pupils who most need it, but more fundamentally, to make sure they also get the benefits of good school food.

The picture gets more complicated when you consider that even the most advantaged children usually don't have all these benefits, and children who have suffered the most hardship are often lacking many of them from the outset.

Quality Preschool Benefits Poor and Affluent Kids, Study Finds NBC News, March 28, 2013 «While most previous studies had focused only on kids from underprivileged backgrounds, in the new study Harvard researchers found that regardless of family income children who got a year of quality prekindergarten did better in reading and math than kids who spent the year in daycare, with relatives, or in some other kind of preschool, according to the report which was published in Child Development.»

This is particularly important for low - income students, who tend to learn most content in school and, unlike affluent children of college - educated parents, generally do not get to benefit from trips to museums, story times at the library, and other opportunities.

The dual - credit program that allows students to get college credits while in high school at little cost is proving to be a national model, but benefiting most are middle - class students who planned to go to college anyway.

My only hope is that those who benefit the most from charters — low - income families of color — don't buy into these falsehoods and lose an opportunity to get off the waiting lists and find a better school for their children.

If your book title idea effectively conveys the solutions contained within your book and seduces your ideal reader with benefits and intrigue, then you can feel confident your book will get noticed by the people who need your information most.

Keep in mind that each Kindle Fire comes with a month of free Amazon Prime membership and the access to all the benefits that that entails (free Instant Video selections, free 2 - Day Shipping, etc), which means that anybody who gets one as a gift will have a chance to most of its more enjoyable features even without any post-purchase investment.

The people who will likely benefit most from getting a personal loan through LoanDepot are individuals with high credit scores and high income.

In fact, Pew released the results of a study analyzing the mortgage tax deduction for the year 2010 to get an idea of who benefits most from the mortgage tax deduction.