Sentences with phrase «who had enough money»

They had control of this knowledge or by people who had enough money to invest in web development.

I know people who are on government assistance, getting free schooling, free healthcare, etc, but who have enough money to buy 100 pairs of shoes, name brand clothing, own an iPhone, and buy a Mercedes.

This leaves women searching for those not - so - loathsome male souls who have enough money to finance their own health care and also don't need their money to buy their latest post-middle age toy.

My experience proves that Victoria Brides is not a scam — it's a platform where people who have enough money to invest in a serious search can meet their soulmates and develop a meaningful relationship with them.

They are free so anyone ranging from a college student struggling to make ends meet — to an entrepreneur who has enough money to spare, can join without a problem.

Well, MissTravel.com is meant to assist traveling Sugar Daddies, who have enough money to...

Well, MissTravel.com is meant to assist traveling Sugar Daddies, who have enough money to spend on luxurious hotels, expensive clothing, entertainment, shoes, generous dinners, and airfare, and most importantly find POT Sugar Babies who are ready and willing to be their travelling companions.

That is why you will see people who have enough money to buy things in cash still using their credit card to make purchase.

There are parents who have enough money to max out their retirement accounts and save for their kids» university education.

Ridiculous, only for people who have enough money to waste on craps.

You'd think that people who have enough money to pay someone to manage that money wouldn't lose their homes.

Second are those who have enough money to just go with the flow.

Not exact matches

«Most people are in prison because they didn't know how to make enough money legally,» says Jackson, who has more than a decade left in his sentence at Green Haven.

I have worked with several CEOs who have had great success in their careers where they got the chance to sell their businesses for enough money where they would never have to work again.

We all know people who are less successful than they'd otherwise be because they spend their entire lives chasing enough money to live.

There are also some people who have been able to earn enough money to support themselves exclusively as an Airbnb host.

It's usually the unsuccessful ones who complain about not having enough money.

The four out of five small business owners who aren't seeking money to grow right now may not have enough confidence in the future, enough clarity on which direction to take their businesses, or enough demand building to convince them there is growth to be had.

«It's not so much about the funds, the Europeans have enough money to lend to Greece,» an official close to the bailout talks, who asked to remain anonymous due to the sensitivity of negotiations, told CNBC earlier this week, adding that the issue is more of credibility.

Krinzman says the entrepreneurs who pitched the idea of a «Boogie Box» workout DVD likely would have gotten some capital if they'd asked for only enough money «to get to a milestone that would let them prove they can sell DVDs,» rather than asking for full funding for an unproven idea.

Datskovsky, who emigrated from Russia with her parents when she was 11 years old, is driven by the memory of «going to the grocery store and not having enough money to buy food.»

And it's not just the smaller sites that everyone is looking at, wondering whether they have enough money to survive, and who will be the next to either close down or be bought by a larger entity.

It's also nice to see someone who doesn't have to make «all the money» as opposed to enough money.

Tesla is in trouble again, is running short on money again, because it is having difficulty building enough of its amazing Model S sedans for people who've already paid for them.

But the same could be said for someone who has all the money they need and make enough per year passively to do what they really want to be doing, whether it be artistic, scientific, philanthropic, or just enjoying life's little nuances.

I am convinced the Euro has been riding high these last few years due to currency manipulators and a few key players who had enough green backs to short the dollar, prop up the Euro, and make a ton of money in the process (George Soros comes to mind).

Traditional IRAs are particularly useful for people who don't have retirement plans at work (although many people have both a 401k and an IRA; they open IRAs after they have put enough money into their 401ks to get their employer match).

While the U.S. economy has rebounded, the financial environment is still cloudy to more than 50 % of Americans who are still worried about having enough money in savings and feeling secure with their current finances.

14 % of respondents believe that insider trading practices in the alternative investment industry have become less prevalent since the FBI arrested Raj Rajaratnam and scared the bejeezus out of everyone, a noticeable drop from January 2016 when 25 % of respondents felt this way; 37 % of respondents think the news of arrests and convictions there has had little impact on insider trading because those who engage in such practices think they are smarter than everyone else and will never get caught, compared with 39 % of respondents in 2016; and 49 % of respondents believe the influx of money into funds in recent years and the explosion in the number of hedge fund firms has put enough pressure on fund managers that there will always be a few desperate enough to try anything, including insider trading, a significant increase from the 36 % of respondents who felt this way in the Roundtable's previous survey on this topic.

Consequently, the President just wants to increase the taxes of that group who, regardless of intelligence and hard work, have made enough money by which they should be taxed more.

Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...

«Some people who are just living on the edge - who are in work, but are genuinely concerned that they may not have enough money to get through to see them through the next few days,» she said.

Even if you were able to save enough money for travel expenses to go to him, you would have to wait in line for months just to talk to him for a few short minutes because of all the other people who want to see Him.

Like John Chrysostom before him, Gregory argued that one who «loves money can never have enough» (Eccl.

If I forget to lock my door, you are still a thief if you enter my house and take anything... meaning, the banks still chose to engage in the risky behavior that caused the financial meltdown... and yes, they knew it would happen, but as long as they made enough money in the short term, who needs to care about the long term?

Those who sound that tocsin usually accompany it with the demand that more money be devoted to poverty» the bulk of it for the expansion of the bureaucracies of the poverty industry, with just enough going to poor people to keep them in the agitated discontent to which they have become accustomed, destroying their neighborhoods rather than ours.

He was not a Klopp signing and does not fit his tactics, which suggests that he is unlikely to have a long - term future with the Reds, who might look to offload him if they can recoup enough of their money.

Bottom line, if he is angered bench the players who were not good enough and play those who deserve some game time based on the Southampton game or on games where they had a positive impact: - Take Özil out and play Ox in the hole (he has to understand your the highest paid player of the club, your given freedom like nobody else and your even seeking even more money with a new contract you can't play like that ever and go AWOL)- Put Sanchez on the wing or up top but put Welbeck in (Walcott didn't track back near enough for the Alsonso goal)- Iwobi has been bright from the wing let him play there - Xhaka has to go back in the holding midfield role and I would take out Coquelin because he could've taken a foul on the hazard's goal.

If the Padres have enough money to be interested in Moncada, who will cost $ 60 million to $ 80 million, then the Padres have enough money for Hamels, who is owed $ 96 million over the next four years.

Every week there are golf tournaments all around the world competing for the top players, who make enough money in this era to only have to play occasionally.

I can picture her walking behind someone in the lunchline who dosent have enough money to pay for there nutty buddy, and shes getting really pissed off because people are starting to fill up the popular table and she has to make sure to get a seat there.

We have enough money we don't need to lose our first choice right back two years running, especially a man who already has PL experience.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

He's not the only problem, as Silent Stan has the say on who goes or stays & hes happy enough making money (his shares have doubled in # # #) all the while we falter like every single one of his other sports teams, check it up I don't have to explain it.

Gibbs should be sold if West Brom come in with 10 million and if we somehow get rid of Debuchy and sell Chambers and Lucas too plus the money for Szczesny we'll bag enough cash to buy a player or two who will improve the squad without doing major damage, because we had players with the numbers 1,2,3 and 10 either out of the club or playing less than 10 games last season.

So the board went and spent more money on a CF who was not going to be good enough in the next 12 months rather than wait 12 months until they have more money to buy a better player?

Wenger is just a stingy old man who has lost all passion for trophies, all he cares about is making enough money to retire on.

«Now, I get from an owner's point of view — who has little view about football like Kroenke does — then it's about making money, but it's not good enough for the supporters.

We ended up buying Wengers target still but AFC have wasted money in the meantime on players who are not good enough.

It's all good and well saying we want kroenke / gazidis / law / wenger out, but the truth is that while this club makes money there's no chance of that happening, then we'd need to find a buyer who cares for the club enough to do right by all.