Sentences with phrase «who heard the claims»

Indeed Mr Justice Floyd, who heard the claims of Drs Kelly and Chiu for compensation under s 40 (1), found that without the patent protection which Amersham secured for Myoview the deals could not have been achieved, alternatively that the price of them would have been much higher to Amersham.

Not exact matches

Moore has dismissed these allegations, claiming he never heard of Corfman and Young, although he did acknowledge knowing Deason and another woman who came forward to the Post, Debbie Wesson Gibson.

Neil Patel reports that he's gained 14 to 26 percent more traffic from use of custom images, and he's heard of others who claim traffic has doubled or tripled.

If you hear that claim from someone who lives next door to the red house and you trust that person, you probably would be inclined to believe the information more than if you heard it from someone else who lives next to you (and further from the red house).

U.S. District Judge Edward Chen, who is hearing the federal lawsuit, previously said the drivers» claims in the case could amount to as much as $ 1 billion, according to Bloomberg.

When Freitas sat down to talk to young people about their phones, she heard some pretty crazy stories of raging tech addiction, from the girl who gave her phone a name and talked about it like a friend to the boy who claimed he'd rather leave his brain at home than his precious device.

Among those expected to attend a hearing at the federal district court in Manhattan is Stormy Daniels, the adult - film star who claims she had sex with Trump in 2006 and took a $ 130,000 hush payment shortly before the 2016 election.

During the House committee hearing on Wednesday, Zuckerberg claimed not to know what «shadow profiles» are, even though this term has been used for years to describe Facebook's collection of data about people who don't use its services by harvesting the inboxes and smartphone contacts of active Facebook users.

Of the people surveyed, 82.2 percent said they had heard about the allegations publicized by the Washington Post, including one woman who claims Moore had sexual contact with her when she was 14 and he was 32, but regardless, nearly three - fourths of Republicans don't want their candidate to drop out.

There are restaurateurs who claim they are more profitable, but restaurant people I know roll their eyes when they hear a claim of 20 % profit like this:

Employment practices liability insurance, or EPLI as you may have heard it called, provides protection to companies who have employees against claims by current or former employees for things like discrimination, wrongful termination, or sexual harassment.

«This person told this unnamed person about what they hear this person saw, and so I wrote it down, but you won't know who I am either» just doesn't cut it, Chad when it comes to supernatural claims.

Hardly, after man came up with then disregarded as utter nonsense the previous 10,000 or so gods in existence, we decided not to jump on the current bandwagon claiming salvation for the believer and damnation for the rest... Pray tell, what became of all the people who had never the chance to hear of his words / deeds after he came and died?

If women's health were really a concern for anyone who claims moral objection, they wouldn't have excluded women from the congressional hearing.

We need to move back beyond the first pages of Genesis to the reality of God Himself, a God who brings being out of non-being (a metaphysical claim if I've ever heard one!).

and you believe everything you see and hear from the media, especially the ones who claim to be objective when in fact they are totally not?

So I ask, because I have never heard someone (you were around GES much more than I) who claimed that this statement under consideration, and this statement alone is the gospel.

When finally hearing Julie's painful story after five long years, I would expect to see statements of empathy and regret from the members of the discernment team who claim to have intended sincere pastoral care.

And sadly, those who claim to know God the best are often the ones who hear Him the worst.

NCR gives a link to some of these doubts by «Vatican experts»: unfortunately, these «experts» include John Cornwell, author of Hitler's Pope, who said he had never heard the claims described by Pacepa and considers them «most unlikely», though «as a supporter of Nato and the Western Alliance, it's not inconceivable the pope could have been targeted [by the KGB].

It gets very frustrating after a while when those who claim to be silenced are also not heard when they do speak.

It was a little surprising for me to hear these words coming from this man who claimed to be a Calvinist.

Those with any moral clarity at all have heard a better voice in this campaign: no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification, but the test of values and integrity, and a president who respects family and rights of faith is better than one who, like you, claims a religious label but then opposes family and faith.

It is amazing for me to hear people who claim to be living by faith, but they never read their Bible.

I could see a god who caused the universe to begin and hasn't been heard from since, but I don't buy any of the religions that claim a personal god that has interacted with humanity in any way.

The bible is an ancient text written by men who CLAIMED to hear god's word... that is not proof.

I am curious to hear you explanation on how this differs from people who claim that America is a christian nation, and that our laws should be based on the bible.

I'm not sure which is worse: people who claim to see or hear supernatural beings or those who believe them.

Matthew begins this chapter with a startling and sad confession: «I am far from the only gay Christian who has heard the claim that gay people will not inherit the kingdom of God.

But when a man who claimed to be the Son of God drops by three days after you saw him die and buried, it seals the deal as far a who Jesus is and you write everything you ever heard him say down and tell all that will listen.

Yes, mental hospitals are stocked with many like him who hear voices claiming to be God or God's agents.

it really is scary that those who claim to be offering the truth can do so with such hatred... wish that you could see behind your prejudiced perspective at how your rhetoric comes across, maybe then someone else could hear your concern or have some dialogue with whatever it is you have to say

I hear and I read of people who have claimed to see angels.

Two people who claim to hear god's voice and have the indwelling of the holy spirit have no idea what the other person thinks and where they disagree about god and what he wants without the internet.

That claim is challenged by the reality that the overwhelming majority of Christians in the world, who are in the broadest sense the ecclesia, have never heard of «justification by faith alone,» and most who have heard of it have not the foggiest notion of what it means.

These institutions have many patients who claim to have heard the Word of God while reading the Bible.

1) those who never heard of the Islamic principles, perhaps because they were living too far off 2) those who where exposed to Islam with false claims about the religion (thus misleading them into like islamophobia),

I'm curious as to what you would think regarding a woman who claims to have been taken in to the glory where she heard God speak, saying, «They do not understand; the only important thing is that they love one another.»

I suspected when I first heard this claim that the Committee on the Status of Black Americans, loaded as it was with social scientists, had demolished a straw man, a bloodless construct so rigidly defined as to be meaningless in terms of the actual lives of the humans who inhabit the nation's ghettos and who, for the most part, make up what has come to be called the underclass.

I just keep hearing from people who claim that all their charity work is for ENEMIES.

On all sides of conversation between people who prefer one or another title for themselves, I hear claims that make sense to me as one Christian among many.

The claim of the Christian Church to make its voice heard in matters of politics and economics is very widely resented, even by those who are Christian in personal belief and in devotional practice.

As for the adults who came to us claiming to have discovered their «true» sexual identity and to have heard about sex - change operations, we psychiatrists have been distracted from studying the causes and natures of their mental misdirections by preparing them for surgery and for a life in the other sex.

Yep, you heard that right: I did just make the claim that those who brand all religious faith «delusion» need to take care not to become delusional themselves.

I had to learn to look beyond smiling faces, empty rhetoric, to asking myself why those who want to get very close very quickly or those who say one thing like claiming no strict rules about becoming a full accepted member somewhere only later on to start hearing of expectations and the guilt tripping brain - washing used.

These are the words of men who were compelled by God to tell, not only what they claim to have heard God say, but things happening in and around them — their struggles, personal reasons for writing and specific experience of God.

Frankly, I am tired of hearing from folks who claim that science and religion are converging.

It spawned the «reparative therapy» movement, which sought to reverse same - sex attraction through intensive counseling, and has been perpetuated in the work of Joseph Nicolosi who wrote in 1996 «You will hear a shallowness in the voice of any homosexual who claims to love and respect his father...» Yikes.

But does it follow that no messenger who claims to be from God can or should be given a hearing?

Anyone who claims to hear voices telling them what to do belongs in a straight jacket.