Sentences with phrase «who knows more about the subject»

This may be the chair of your dissertation committee, but it may also be an assistant professor who knows more about the subject and has more time to supervise your research.

It sort of sounds like what my mom used to say...» An expert is someone who knows more about a subject than you do!»

Not exact matches

(iii) you are a complete blowhard who has never studied one subject of university level biology, never been on an archaeological dig, never studied a thing about paleontology, geology, astronomy, linguistics or archaeology, but feel perfectly sure that you know more than the best biologists, archaeologists, paleontologists, doctors, astronomers botanists and linguists in the World because your mommy and daddy taught you some comforting stories from Bronze Age Palestine as a child.

(iii) you are a complete blowhard who has never studied one subject of university level biology, never been on an archeological dig, never studied a thing about paleontology, geology, astronomy, linguistics or archeology, but feel perfectly sure that you know more than the best biologists, archeologists, paleontologists, doctors, astronomers botanists and linguists in the World because your mommy and daddy taught you some comforting stories from Bronze Age Palestine as a child.

I don't mean to harshly mock little mistakes, but you used the word more than once in your post, and there is simply no way that someone who was knowledgable about the subject even in the slightest would not know the word for the procedure.

As anyone who has been following the subject of sports - related head injuries knows, the concern about RHI has continue to grow exponentially over the past four years, as researchers have used ever more sensitive and sophisticated imaging techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and fMRI to identify short -, medium, and long - term effects on the brain of RHI.

«I suspect what really gets to you is people who know a hell of a lot more about a subject than you do — and are willing to say so»

Those who know more about climate science, for example, are slightly more likely to accept that global warming is real and caused by humans than those who know less on the subject.

mmm... a protagonist who complete dominates a long film to the detriment of context and the other players in the story (though the abolitionist, limping senator with the black lover does gets close to stealing the show, and is rather more interesting than the hammily - acted Lincoln); Day - Lewis acts like he's focused on getting an Oscar rather than bringing a human being to life - Lincoln as portrayed is a strangely zombie character, an intelligent, articulate zombie, but still a zombie; I greatly appreciate Spielberg's attempt to deal with political process and I appreciate the lack of «action» but somehow the context is missing and after seeing the film I know some more facts but very little about what makes these politicians tick; and the lighting is way too stylised, beautiful but unremittingly unreal, so the film falls between the stools of docufiction and costume drama, with costume drama winning out; and the second subject of the film - slavery - is almost complete absent (unlike Django Unchained) except as a verbal abstraction

Also, I like to engage beta readers who know more about certain subjects than I do.

However, for those who are keen to know more, perhaps they should read some books (meant for laymen) about the subject also.

This event promises to be an unmissable opportunity for enthusiasts who want to know more about the man and his work or those intrigued by the artist's technique and curious subject matter.

I would love to more gentle about it, but the inconsistencies and incoherence of the Carlin submission are painfully obvious to anyone who knows anything about the subject.

I read this website to become more acquainted with the science of climate change (I'm also attending Prof. Archer's Coursera class on climate change right now), and because this website seems trustworthy to me as someone who doesn't know enough about climate science to decide for myself who's right or wrong about this subject.

Yet they directed all their questions on the subject to the bloke down the other end — Rear Admiral Titley, who knows no more about the satellite record than I do.

It suggests that, by instinct or by birth, you know more about this subject (even if you show no sign of ever having studied it) than the thousands of intelligent people who have spent their lives working on it.

As anyone who's ever been to a car mechanic might know, it's intimidating to screen professionals who know more than you about the subject at hand.

As the internet has proven time and again, people who reside in armchairs in their parents basement are far more intelligent and know far more about any subject than anybody who is actually trained in that area and has years of experience behind them.

The definition of an expert is someone who knows more than the average person about a particular subject.