Sentences with phrase «who makes less money»

There are different common mistakes made by the person who makes less money, or who is the primary parent, often the wife.

Dating a man who makes less money or hasnt attained as high a level of education can be.

«I always say this and people take it the wrong way, but I think it's awkward to date someone who makes less money than me.»

More than 1 in 5 women — 22 % — say they wouldn't date someone who makes less money than them, according to a new survey of 3,000 singles across the U.S. from dating company Plenty of Fish.

For example, according to Strachan, a man who makes less money than his wife or chooses to serve the family as a stay - at - home dad is a «man fail» because «men are called to be leaders, providers, protectors and women are nurturers.»

This means that when you start a business, you have a lot more to risk than someone who makes less money and has fewer career options.

If you own a valuable asset, you're better off than people who don't own that asset but who make less money.

Thats a. Would you marry a man who made less money than you?

On the other hand, interest rates are higher for those who make less money, likely because interest rates are typically higher on smaller loans.

Otherwise, cap and trade would constitute a de facto tax increase, and a regressive one, since energy costs account for a higher precentage of the income of those who make less money than those who make more.

Not exact matches

This means that if you choose to start a business, thinking that it would be a good source of funds, you could very well make less money than your friend who works a minimum wage job.

page 116), a dreamer who went into business less to make money than to change the world.

He who controls the mint or the printing press, after all, realizes a profit by putting money into circulation (the term is seigniorage), since the cost of making a coin or banknote is usually less than its face value.

In the September 2016 Harvard Business Review article, researchers say people who work for a company that has been enmeshed in scandal make less money when they leave to work elsewhere.

In all of the above cases the entrepreneur who is susceptible to the confirmation bias will look for information and analyze it in a way that will yield: 1) fewer competitors rather than more, because it increases the viability of the start - up, 2) underestimation of the capabilities of the competition because stronger competitors will make life harder for the entrepreneur, 3) view of the company's product as fully addressing the needs of the customer because otherwise the start - up is at a weaker position in the marketplace, and 4) need for less resources rather than more because it generally makes raising the money easier.

But once you get them all setup and integrated into your workflow, you'll be able to spend less time on the administration side of your business, and more time on the money - making side... and who doesn't love that?

You can «absolutely» make money by going green, said Khosla, who believes ethanol can eventually be produced for less than $ 1 a gallon.

Remember, if the government gives us a tax cut they'll still have to make up the budget shortfall somehow, chiefly by selling more bonds to American citizens (who happen to be the same people getting the tax cut) or foreigners (who will raise the money by selling us more of their goods and services, or buying less of ours).

«Retail is seen as less intense and less involved in terms of management,» said Weiser, adding that this makes retail properties an attractive proposition for anyone who has to spend a lot of money quickly.

I haven't met an employee, except very highly compensated ones (and then only rarely), who did not have an deeply emotional response to the possibility of ratcheting downward in any given year (i.e., making less money).

I might be ecelectic, but what makes me consistent is my belief is something that combines the belief of Scripture with that of Englightenment philosophy: nurturing life is goodness, simply, and helping others to see a model that thinking for ourselves can help heal the world of all past injustices - so that we all learn to WANT to be good... within reason and by our own choice...: you have a society like that, you'll have less injustices, less violence, less money - grubbing by people who hold themselves as representatives of «authority» -(which side are you on, by the way, if you see the world as so divided in such a bipolar reality...?)

The money goes to pay for the buiding, the utilities, the maintenance, salaries for the staff (2 people including the pastor who makes less than the average member), supplies and office equipment, donations that our church sends to other churches around the world, money we send to a native American school in New Mexico, and about a dozen other groupls that we help to support.

People sneer at the former communist true believers who have now become capitalist managers, and they make snide comments about foreigners who migrate from Eastern Europe and are willing to work for less money than Germans are.

Think about that, because Romney can care less about anyone who can't do nothing for him to make more money and if you don't see that you should ask the lord for help because you are blind and walking through the wilderness...

But if we're reportedly offering less than his # 25m release clause, then that would make him a lot better value for money, so who knows, might be a good deal after all.

I am one of the Arsenal fans who thought that our long serving manager did a brilliant job keeping us at least in the fight when all the crazy money from the likes of Chelsea and Man city came about just when Wenger had to make do with less due to the Stadium move.

Owners (Just Kroenke) is the one who spends less charges the highest ticket price to make money.

But in football, the NCAA - created black market is filled less by apparel / agency types who want to make money and more by sports fans who want to see their teams win (and yeah, there are exceptions on both sides).

2) Is Martial going to discard Champions League football presumably for less money to play for a team who do not look like they will make the top 4 when its very clear that United are at the beginning of something and not the end of a cycle?

@ larryking listen jock wenger could never coach anyother club because no big club would go six season without a trophy there is no way wenger could go to madrid and go two season without a trophy no way in hell he would be fired in no time bmunich fired klinsman less than half season look at the real madrid coach grave yard pelligrinie made 95 + points last season that amount would win the league in almost any country yet he got fired i can go on if fergi goes two seasons without a trophy am sure he gone i love arsenal but football is about winning trophies wenger has hypnotize you i do nt care arsenal have gone five years without a trophy and six witout the league not even a carling cup or fa cup and loosing all our best players all for money all this talk about wenger and his youth policies i can count on both hands all the players that came through arsenal youth system that went on to be world beaters look at the current crop walcott nasri diaby denilson bedtner clichy none of these are world class they have improve minimal @ arsenal compare that to barca their youths pedro and co are world beaters event the great vanpercy who we rate he would never leave arsenal because all that chance wenger gives him he would» t get at other big clubs this does not make sense we buy young players they take ages to develop most do nt» t then we sell them or they leave because they want to win things that how you grow pretty soon that top four will become very hard to stay in if we get out of that then what i wish all you wenger fans luck am all out of patients with him last chance this year................

Lets face it, most women will Never go with a man that makes much Less money than they do which makes it very sad for many of us men that really wanted to get married to have a family since many women just Can't Accept us for who we really are.

Marriage has become a system where the person who makes more money, shall pay the lesser earner enough so that incomes are rendered equal in the eyes of the state.

Wouldn't a woman who makes her own money be less likely to be a «gold - digger»?

Husbands whose wives make more money are 61 % less likely to say they're happy Wives who are primary breadwinners are also significantly less happy about their family lives than other women Men are 5 times more likely to cheat when they're financially dependent on their wives Divorce is 40 % more likely when a women makes over 60 % of the family's income Much of the discussion around this topic so far has focused on the broader business and economic consequences of this shift.

According to one study, babies who were breastfed for 12 months grew up to have a higher IQ, complete more education, and make more money compared to babies who were breastfed for less than one month.

Making it legal would also make criminals who supply the drug redundant, so they would make less money.

Candidates who accept public financing get rewarded for raising money from small donors, which helps make those candidates less beholden to special interests.

No matter who got the shocks — the computer told the decider who would get the shocks — the decider always got the money -LSB-...] The study's participants did not like the pain of receiving a shock, because they were willing to make about $ 0.30 less money per shock on average to receive fewer of them.

(Forest Whitaker is well cast as the smalltime trainer who gives Billy a second chance; Curtis «50 Cent» Jackson less so as the mercenary promoter who proves there's no such thing as loyalty in boxing as long as there's cash money to be made.)

This power doesn't make women any less of a riddle to Tim, who apparently only uses his abilities to get laid, though no character ever seems to have a problem with money over the film's runtime.

One truly can compare the watching of how big studios and their hired bigwigs operate as the equivalent of watching how sausage gets made, as many of us to very much enjoy the end product, but we would be less pleased if we were to know how a kernel of inspiration from the mind of a writer can be second - guessed and repackaged due to executive decisions made by relatively visionless empty suits who are in the creation process solely to make money, squeezing out all trace of artistic merit where it interferes with bottom - line profit.

Although smaller in scale and ambition, and lesser in terms of emotional content, this sequel is lighthearted, comical, occasionally charming, and while, on the whole, it's really all a superfluous money grab, it is well made and amiable enough to garner a recommendation for anyone who enjoyed the first film and is anxious for more.

«Upper - middle class families and above have made the determination that college admissions officers devalue paid work and that if you're not pursuing a hectic schedule of activities you'll be less appealing to colleges,» said Ron Lieber, author of The Opposite of Spoiled: Raising Kids Who Are Grounded, Generous, and Smart About Money.

A synthesis of the best evidence suggests that, while money is part of the equation, it is less important than other factors in attracting and retaining educators who can make a difference in schools.

Compared to most full - sized vehicles, the Tahoe has impressive fuel - efficiency that makes it a good choice for drivers who want to spend less money on gasoline and make fewer stops at fueling stations.

(cont'd)- I'm giving away hundreds of listings on the Vault, and as a result of doing so, won't see one thin dime of income on the site until October or later - Given all the time and money I've already sunk into developing the site, I don't even expect to earn back my upfront investment until sometime next year - I'm already personally reaching out to publishers on behalf of authors who are listed in the Vault, on my own time and my own long distance bill, despite the fact that I don't stand to earn so much as a finder's fee if any of those contacts result in an offer - I make my The IndieAuthor Guide available for free on my author site and blog - I built Publetariat, a free resource for self - pubbing authors and small imprints, by myself, and paid for its registration, software and hosting out of my own pocket - I shoulder all the ongoing expense and the lion's share of administration for the Publetariat site, which since its launch on 2/11 of this year, has only earned $ 36 in ad revenue; the site never has, and likely never will, earn its keep in ad revenue, but I keep it going because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away far more copies of my novels than I've sold, because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part of the Rise of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to less than $.50 per hour of my time spent reading and commenting In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow authors.

That publishers, who are in financial distress, made a good decision to adopt a pricing model that brings in less money per title.

Add into the mix the fact that publishers have admitted they make less money per title under the agency model than they did before and you have the answer to who is harmed.

In fact, the percentage of authors who earn their livings solely from their writing careers — much less make huge amounts of money at it — is exceedingly small.

You may not make a ton of money but Amazon knows that there's a large number of authors who'd be willing to receive less pay in exchange for broader readership.