Sentences with phrase «who only marked»

In a review of research on written composition, George Hillocks (1986) noted that in studies on error correcting, teachers who marked every error were no more effective in increasing the quality of students» work than teachers who only marked the errors that current instruction focused on.

Not exact matches

It can be tempting to focus only on your superstars while sidelining anyone who's failing to hit the mark.

When he hits the mark, Bezos, who started selling books from his garage 22 years ago, becomes the first man to bump Gates from his perch in seven years and is only the sixth man to hold the «richest person» title in the past 30 years, according to Forbes.

I don't think I'm the only one who feels this way — Mark Wilson over at gaming site Kotaku lamented on this a few years back, as did Games Are Fun ages ago.

But while Branson, Bezos and Musk have more than made their mark on the industry, they aren't the only ones who have been taking advantage of our fascination with space exploration.

The decision by the central bank's policy setting panel was in line with the expectations of markets and economists, who had given only low odds to governor Mark Carney removing a mild bias towards raising rates sometime.

i think harri is responding to mark's response to my telling someone who was vomiting up scripture that people those quotes are only valid to those who accept the authority of the scripture.

Not to mention, for those of you who have a belief and has ur faith in Traditional Christianity (along with any other religion); YOU WILL SUFFER the 7 last plagues of God, due to the mark of the beast that is about to be enforced by a resurrected ROMAN EMPIRE that is arising now in Europe unless you can repent and turn to the ONE and ONLY TRUE GOD!

Only those who already believe in a god, and believe that this god engineered life, sees the mark of this creator wherever they look.

hopefully your not using the Dentsu poll as your source, it is based only upon those who answered they do not fit into any religious group and their statistical sampling is notoriously skewed (there are 3 kinds of lies: lies, damn lies and statistics... Mark Twain)

All this time, and not only is God still «responding to the facts of human life,» but doing so with unprecedented intensity and resolve in the person of him who cures disease and puts demons to flight and heals the breach between humanity and God: even «Jesus Christ, Son of God» (Mark 1:1)

Most new testament scholars say that the Gospel of Mark originally ended with the story of the women who go to the cemetery, only to encounter a mysterious young man pointing to Jesus» empty tomb and announcing the resurrection.

And so the tale of a Green Knight with his chopped - off head still holding a knight of the Round Table to promises made is no less true than the tale of a man crammed with secrets who spontaneously combusts and leaves behind only a black, tallowy mark on the floorboards, and his story in turn is no less true than the tale of a Texas sharecropper's wife who has had a miscarriage only ten days before but just this morning was walking behind the mule and guiding the jerking plow.

That's why he not only fired his assistant who said to a friend that «Mark could use someone in his life to go toe - to - toe with him» — he actually accused her of heresy.

Mark does not name these disciples, but maybe they were James and John, who only hours before had proposed to Jesus, «Grant us to sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your glory.»

«It marks not only the place I hold as the Church of England's first woman Bishop and the sign of hope that may be for those who aspire to break new ground, but also the continuing fruitful dialogue between faith and learning and our shared endeavour to be beacons of possibility.»

Whatever its origin — and I myself agree with Wellhausen and others in attributing the identification to the primitive Christian community, as their least inadequate and only possible term for one who was thus both human and divine and yet not God (which would have been unthinkable in their realm of ideas)-- whatever its origin, this first great step in the advance of Christology was of endless significance for the later development of Christian doctrine, and it was of paramount importance for the Gospel of Mark.

Mark knows that only those who follow Jesus to the cross will recognize who he is.

Mark alone adds the curious incident of the young man clad only in a linen cloth who tried to follow, and, when he was seized, slipped out of the cloth and fled naked (Mk 14:51 - 52).

I don't want to party with those who spend their days sleeping around, watching TV, doing drugs, smoking, drinking, and collecting their monthly checks, which they can only collect people like me work our butts off every week and mark hard decisions about how to spend our money.

no part of which appears in Mark and only the last clause in Matthew (Lk 22:28 - 29; cf. Mt 19:28): «You are those who have continued with me in my trials; and I assign to you, as my Father assigned to me, a kingdom, that you may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.»

If you are saved and sin but do not confess your sin and repent at the time of your death, you will not enter the Kingdom of God because only those who are made righteous and are justified can enter (Mark 9:43, 45 - 45, 47, 1 John 1:9).

The only ones who will come close to the $ 100,000 mark are those with churches that are approaching or have reached the mega church level of over about 2,000 attendees.

Jude 1:4 For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.

The «playbook» of these last days have been written long ago: «For certain men have crept in unnoticed, who long ago were marked out for this condemnation, ungodly men, who turn the grace of our God into lewdness and deny the only Lord God and our Lord Jesus Christ.

What if we understood Christians to be only those who «hear the word, accept it, and produce a crop» (Mark 4:20)?

Because the Church heard the story and memorized and repeated it timelessly long before Mark took pen to paper, having first heard it from the only one who could tell it with such embarrassingly specific candor, from Peter himself.

the only way for you to make that claim, is for you to know who they actually were, and that they werent Mark / Matthew..

After only the briefest interval — so Mark implies all along — ; his followers were convinced that he had risen from the dead — not as one more resuscitated Israelite, like the daughter of Jairus, nor as a saint who had entered glory, like Moses or Elijah, but as no one less than the transcendent, heavenly Messiah, the «Son of Man» who was to come on the clouds of heaven and hold the last judgment upon all mankind.

This manifests itself not only in the way in which Aristotelian notions of the «unmoved mover» or neo-Platonic ideas of «being - subsisting from - itself» have been taken to be the proper definition of what is meant when we speak of «God», but also in liturgical language where all too often the basic concept implied or (as most often seems to be the case) affirmed is the utter immutability of deity, along with the rigidly legalistic moralism which it is suggested should mark those who claim to «obey» the divine mandates.

sounds more like «corporate brainstorming», but what I was trying to suggest is that it appears that we're witnessing (not intentionally) an evolving understanding of what wd become more central to the narrative and eventually orthodox.That is, if you cdn't believe it, you were out the door.A good example wd be the higher Christology that the fourth gospel reflects and more specifically, the virgin birth which it (like Mark and Paul) doesn't mention.If the birth narratives that we're familiar with are absent from the earliest gospel and the most theological gospel that came decades later, and can only be found in the other two gospels that we know used the first, it at least suggests a growing and evolving understanding of who Jesus «was» and «is».

Jesus repeatedly taught that only those who believe and endure to the end will be saved * Matt 10:22, 24:13; Mark 13:13

Jude warned of â $ œChristian Teachersâ $ like you, Mr Hayward, â $ œFor certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.

Not only had I lost my temper, but my lack of self - control had left a visible mark — one I had to walk by for weeks until my grandfather, who had drywall patching skills, came to visit.

No matter what I said, Mark was going to keep going to groups like this one and telling thousands upon thousands of Christians that being gay was caused by faulty parenting, that it only led to misery, and that anyone who wanted to become straight could... And they would pass those beliefs on to their children and other Christians, who would act upon that misinformation whenever they encountered gay people.»

Christ complimented the widow who only threw two «coins» (about one dollar) into the treasury (Mark 12:42).84 Christ said she had given more than all the others he saw giving that day because she gave even though she herself was in need.

and even in Mark and the other Synoptics, as we have already observed, it is only Jesus who uses the title; the Gospel writers themselves never use it, nor does any other person in their narratives.

I have placed the word «Messiah» in quotation marks because, strictly speaking, the term designates only one of these several ways, namely, the ideal King, usually of David's line, who would reign as God's vicegerent over a restored Israel.

Utilitarianism seems to mark not only the attitude of the political powers that use religion for the sake of social control and transform it to suit their purposes, but also the attitude of many who oppose them.

Yet these new Catholics would also have learned that failure is an old story in the Church, and that the Father of mercies is eager to welcome back those who stray, if only they acknowledge that they have fallen off the path marked out by God's Son and commit themselves to a different future.

And it was Mark Twain who once quipped, «Man is the only animal that blushes or needs to.»

He became a treasured mentor, not only as a teacher of Catholic theology and religiously informed political thought, but also as a friend who unselfishly gave his time in conversation marked by singular shrewdness, prudence, wit, and zeal.

Mark Steyn calls them» The «COEXIST» Bombers «The only person who might be disappointed is David Sirota who made fame for himself with «Let's hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American: There is a double standard: White terrorists are dealt with as lone wolves, Islamists are existential threats.»

An apostle who proclaimed the gospel among Jews might have believed that Jewish Christianity, though ultimately only a part of Catholic Christianity, deserved more adequate representation than it found in Mark.

And although Israel bore the mark of that struggle, the limp with which he thereafter went through life, he was a man who had respect not only from others but for himself.

Before the first four who were called to discipleship knew quite what they were getting into, Jesus had declared that they would continue to be fishermen, only it would be people they would catch (Mark 1:17; Matt.

According to reports, workers who do not participate in the assembly are not only marked absent for the day but lose pay as well.

The book that made Bonhoeffer a question mark to many minds was Letters and Papers from Prison.1 Those provocative phrases like «religionless Christianity,» «the God who forsakes us,» «Jesus as the man for others,» and similar phrases appear in context that are only in outline form without full contextual meanings.

The mark of the beast is identifying and marking his followers and only those who have spiritual eyes and ears would know and resist.

This is one of only two places where Mark has a parallel to anything in the Sermon on the Mount, and the only place where Mark has the expression «Father who is in heaven.»