Sentences with phrase «who points these things»

i hate to be the kind of person who points these things out.

The people who point these things out are doing real work.

Not exact matches

Patricia G. Greene, a professor of entrepreneurship at Babson College, points out that «retirement» may not mean the same thing to small business owners as it does to people who have spent their lives working for other people.

The right thing to do when confronted with a mistake is to own up to it, not to make a series of bizarre claims in defense then insult the profession of the people who correctly pointed out the error.

The Anne Frank Foundation said it recognized the «good intentions» of those who name things after Frank, but pointed out that the significance of Frank and what she represents «will increasingly have a contemporary rather than a historical basis.»

But, one thing you feel in Reading is that there are these middle class and working class white folks who feel very angry and are pointing to the Latino population for all their woes.

That last point, Lemonis insists, is essential: The best addition to your team is someone who's going to reliably get things done, as opposed to making promises.

«The thing I'll always remember is a police officer who ran toward me and said, «This way,» pointed to where to run, and then ran towards the gunfire,» Hopkins said.

He does say things are going well, pointing to its 85 million users as proof (although that includes subscribers, plus anyone who has downloaded the app, since the company was founded in 2007).

In business, being on the same page with all stakeholders, even those who view things from a different, even competing, vantage point is critical.

When things get hard, having a manager who can get along and see things from everyone's point of view will create a feeling of inclusion.

In fact, the hardest thing about writing this kind of article, frankly, is the sheer number of great veteran - entrepreneurs who prove the point.

«The ability of anyone to know what you've been browsing about for years, who your contacts are, who their contacts are, things you like and dislike and every intimate detail of your life — from my own point of view it shouldn't exist,» Apple's CEO said, according to Bloomberg.

The Howards have been pleasantly surprised at the number of customers who fill out BizRate's 10 - point survey, which covers things like customer support.

But when you come across entrepreneurs who have a differentiated point of view that most people think is wrong or likely to fail, then that's another thing we think is great.

The likelihood that things won't go your way and that you will encounter multiple points of failure is high, so it's only people with an extraordinary sense of ambition who will run through those walls and figure it out.

But he implied that it would be patriotic for private Russian citizens to «start making contributions — which are right, from their point of view — to the fight against those who say bad things about Russia.»

Advisers who work with Brandes are equipped with a so - called «IDEAS» script, with each letter identifying a different step in the process: Inquire about how the other person is doing; Describe things you hear; Empathize with the client; Add your own point of view; Suggest a solution.

He himself claimed to be» «an old school point and click prop trader» who had «always been good with reflexes and doing things quick,»» and the «Layering Algorithm» that he used was a customized version of «a program that allowed non-programmers to engage in automated trading using spreadsheet commands and functions.»

Just this weekend, he echoed that statement, with a more direct jab at Facebook, following the Cambridge Analytica revelations, telling the audience at a conference in China, «The ability of anyone to know what you've been browsing about for years, who your contacts are, who their contacts are, things you like and dislike and every intimate detail of your life — from my own point of view it shouldn't exist.»

-LSB-...] someone who has spent 16 years after college building my net worth to the point of achieving financial freedom, the last thing I want to do is lose any significant amount of money.

I especially liked a couple of points you raised in the One More Thing section, where you wrote: «What if someone who has a great idea for a project only found out after seeing the calendar?

You'll be spending the money on the things that earn the most points — dining and travel — and you can also enjoy that 1:1 point transfer with all your favorite airline and hotel loyalty programs, which, for those of us who are really into our loyalty programs, can be a big deal.

«Senator Rubio, it's hard to look at you and not look down the barrel on an AR - 15 and not look at Nikolas Cruz, but the point is: You're here and there are some people who are not, and I need to ask two things of you,» Cameron began, before asking his a friend of his to stand up in the crowd.

Adulthood is potentially dangerous because it can create the false expectation that at some magic point we've got things pretty well figured out when, in reality, we're adrift in a sea of people who are literally making it up as they go.

his whole point was that those who * feign * humility in claiming «no one can make such exclusive claims» are actually DOING the very thing to which they're objecting.

@fimilleur from time to time mankind experiences the presence of God, there have been and continue to be events that testify to the presence of Him.The multiple gods you continually point to have an unique difference from the God who first revealed His presence to ancient men i.e. the Hebrews.The particular gods you mention roman etc. are all man made and in many instances men themselves i.e. hercules, but even the ancient greeks realized the limitations of their understanding and included an «unknown» God in their worship structure.many cultures did likewise, having a glimpse of God but not the fullness of understanding that was given to the Jews.Whether or not «we» believe, does not alter the fact that God exists as an unique being, whether or not «we» acknowledge Him «we» will stand before Him.You do not choose to understand, but we are actually standing in His presence right now as He is much bigger than the doctrines and knowledge man ascribes to Him those things you find so questionable are the misconceptions and misrepresentations of God made by men throughout history.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

The issue I've found that many people have who have problems with the Bible being what is known as «the infallible Word of God» is that they are mostly missing the point of the whole thing.

I need people in my life who love me enough to tell me the hard things that I need to hear, to point out my blind spots that I inevitably have.

My point is that one of the things that changed was the outlook towards people who received a paycheck from the Convention, whether as administrators, missionaries, professors, or whatever.

At this point I think it's fair to let the people who research these things, look into the evidence and be allowed the time and space to respond.

Igaftr, I have read that before; the who celibacy thing is supposedly voluntary in the first place, and as you've pointed out, is rather untenable for either gay people it hetero.

Since so few other people take care to mind the concrete details of EQUAL treatment, it's usually left to those of us who would continually get the short end of the stick to point these things out.

Please anyone who responds to this don't name names; those of us familiar with the writing styles know which posts we're talking about and there's no point in stirring things.

At the time a lot of people (especially those with power over the Hebrews) were worshiping the world — the moon, the sea, the sky: that story points to who should be worshiped — the Creator of those things.

From these two points, Paul was able to make his case for there being a one true God «who made the world and all things in it.»

From Agnostic to Islam and I have seen examples in the past... so my humble request to you is not to stop... keep learning or studying the new stuffs... an advice to you when you decide to study or learn about Islam — do not point to the people who does wrong things as wrong doing people are there in everywhere regardless of faith, but look into the scripture and go to someone who has knowledge if you have any question that bothers you but make sure that person is well educated to his community... i ask The Almighty God to open your heart...

It is one thing to seek him for what he can do for you, it is another thing entirely to seek him for who he is... It is good when we get to the point where we can say, «God, what can I do for you today?»

From Zeus to Ra to Allah to any other deity that has come out of human history, the one thing that sets Yahweh apart to me is that here is a God who actually reached out in time at a point in human history to establish relationship with humans.

The unbeliever who commits this sin has become so morally and spiritually blind that their heart is hardened to the point that they no longer care about spiritual things and will never believe in Jesus.

This hermeneutic of love is not mere sentimentality, but one that looks to Christ for its definition — Christ, who did not consider power a thing to be grasped, but humbled himself and became a servant to the point of death on a cross.

The man who is wholly taken up with the demands of everyday living or whose sole interest is in the outward appearances of things seldom gains more than a glimpse, at best, of this second phase in our sense - perceptions, that in which the world, having entered into us, then withdraws from us and bears us away with it: he can have only a very dim awareness of that aureole, thrilling and inundating our being, through which is disclosed to us at every point of contact the unique essence of the universe.

That's one of the things I was pointing out to someone who read a book on necromancy (long island medium) and was totally sold on everything the author wrote and was now at «peace» from reading about the endless cycles of death — i.e. soul coming back as such... dying then coming back again as another.

Let me point out that this attitude — contrary to those who consider it a great new thing in human history — does not seem to be at all new.

Alice, Of all the people on here who have NOT done things Jesus» way, why have you picked out Mustardseed and Andrew to point out that problem?

Perhaps, the most disturbing thing about this ridiculous episode of distractive journalism is that it is Ms. Kelly who has earned the raspberries for pointing out the absurd racism of Ms. Aisha, and not Ms. Aisha for being so absurdly racist.

The people who simply wanted to argue about anything and everything would have stoned her to make a point, except for one thing: Jesus asked each one to judge himself before he judged her.

Those things are not so different suffered by promiscuous heterosexual counterparts who engage in similar behavior, which is part of the point: Abnormal sexual behavior has significant health dangers.

You said, «Those things are not so different suffered by promiscuous heterosexual counterparts who engage in similar behavior, which is part of the point», yet you fail to get the whole point.