Not exact matches
Here are five keys to creating exceptionally strong thought leadership — the kind that gets
read and
viewed and goes viral — culled from executives
who have it down to a science.
Here — for your
reading pleasure — is a countdown of the year's most -
viewed stories about far - out technologies and the entrepreneurs
who are dreaming them up.
«This is especially important for children,
who seem to
read only for plot but are actually forming their
view of the world — and of their places in it.»
«
Reading can offer richer, broader and more complex models of experience, which enable people to view their own lives from a refreshed perspective and with renewed understanding,» says Josie Billington of the University of Liverpool, who's an expert on the effects of r
Reading can offer richer, broader and more complex models of experience, which enable people to
view their own lives from a refreshed perspective and with renewed understanding,» says Josie Billington of the University of Liverpool,
who's an expert on the effects of
readingreading.
That notion of melding interesting, obscure or hot button topics with fan communities has proven so popular that it's lured hundreds of millions of users
who generate tens of billions of page
views annually, giving rise to a site slogan that plausibly
reads «The front page of the internet.»
And Dave Young from Cooley
who read a draft and made sure I wasn't completely off base in my
views.
The marketing team is better informed as to
who it wants to
read or
view its content.
If you're an entrepreneur or VC
who wants somebody else's
view on that you should
read it.
Democrats will push back, but Republicans and allies of the president
who agree with Trump's
view that the Trump - Russia investigation is a political «witch hunt» are unlikely to be swayed by the Democrats» insistence that this memo is a politicized and cherry - picked
reading of the available intelligence.
Canadian and Alberta voters need to understand that every time you get annoyed at Justin Trudeau and the way he manages the country all you need to do is listen to the radio and Charles Adler rant about him or
read articles by Lorne Gunter and Rick Bell from the Edmonton Sun (
who formerly worked at the Alberta Report, and helped Ted Byfield run the Alberta Report into the ditch, or
read anything written by Colby Cosh or Ezra Levant and soon you will realize the propaganda and hate these clowns spread about their own political / religious
views trying to scare the general population to their side or
views.
Every time I get annoyed at Justin Trudeau and the way he manages the country all I do is listen to the radio and Charles Adler rant about him or
read articles by Lorne Gunter and Rick Bell from the Edmonton Sun (
who formerly worked at the Alberta Report, and helped Ted Byfield run the Alberta Report into the ditch, or
read anything written by Colby Cosh or Ezra Levant and soon I realize the propaganda and hate these clowns try and spread about their own political / religious
views I revert back to supporting the more liberal viewpoint).
About the Biz Company Name: JP Healthcare Solutions
Who we talked with: Cathy Foster, Principle,...
Read more
View All
There are others
who might even admit that I have
read material they referred me to, but in any event, I am very comfortable that I am open new alternative
views.
Protestants should, from this point of
view,
read it to be led into an otherwise often closed but nonetheless decisive discussion by a guide
who is himself not Catholic but
who knows the history and is sympathetic to the problems and proffered solutions.
Mr. Blake, I'm impressed to see you enter the fray here, to try to address the inability of Christian apolgists here
who are apparently unable to
read and / or comprehend the written word because doing so upsets their world
view.
sacraments — true you probably don't need a church for them — baptism is commanded (for believers), it's special, but not neccesssarily a sacrament, it can be done by any believer, although possibly it was only the apostles
who baptized (I tend to go with the baptist
view on baptism, because that's what I
read in the Bible.
People
who read news websites and then post comments tend to have strong political
views.
I've attempted to
read the story as a God of Wrath, but it got complicated quick because I had to pick and choose verses and have a rather myopic
view of
who God is.
Those
who read the Krauss article should be warned that Krauss makes a false insinuation about the
views on miracles and the Virgin Birth of Br.
And the problem with praise music is that, in its attempt to be «approachable» to all, it becomes monotonous, tepid and uninspiring by comparison (at least from the point of
view of someone
who can sing and sight -
read).
However, I still
read books and articles by Calvinists and those
who disagree with my
views.
I
read through the comments section and I am now better able to understand Danica, Catie and all others»,
who felt betrayed by TLS, point of
view.
We get to
read religious
views from people
who know nothing of religion and scientific
views from people
who have no clue about science.
You
who treat the Crown of Writings As you treat no other book — Just a paragraph disjointed, Just a crude, impatient look — Try a worthier procedure, Try a broad and steady
view; You will kneel in very rapture When you
read the Bible through.
Try
reading Karen Armstrong's History of God for a detailed analysis of how God has evolved, or people's
view of God has evolved if you prefer, over history.Either God is changing, or people's
views of
who and what God is has changed.
The Bible can be taken literally or figuratively by anyone
who reads it, and it need not be, and is usually not,
viewed consistently.
Hausman had taken a more standard line on Bergson, although in the dialogue below it will be clear that Hausman is pondering in a preliminary way the very questions he has answered above.1 It must be clear to anyone
who has
read Hausman's paper above that his
view regarding Bergson has now changed, and I think greatly to his credit, and to Gunter's.
Although no one
who reads the unconventional
view of causality and temporality set forth in MP will suspect me of trying to restore Aristotle, the dynamic side of the concept of ousia and its resonance with the theme of being have always been important to me.
It's easy for people
who are more liberal on this issue to claim the pastoral high ground (indeed, Chalke's piece is partly pastorally motivated), but that ignores many
who will be hurt to
read his change of
view, and what they will regard as a sharp shift from scripture.
So, no, your
views are not heretical, except to those, like fishon (
read — Pharisees)
who think they KNOW, but can't see that they only BELIEVE.
Aside from that, I think it depends on
who's biography of Luther you
read (regarding Luther's self -
view); some paint him as a tortured soul, others as a man of his times
who was (relatively) happy to be so prior to entering the monastery.
For those
who have defended the traditional interpretation of the resurrection of Jesus as an historical event involving the raising and removal of a physical body, that which has carried most weight is simply the fact that, on a plain
reading of the New Testament, the Bible itself seems to give unqualified support to such a
view, in some places if not in all.
Those
who took issue with the article
read it from their political parties world
view and misconstrued the meaning.
But I think that most
who read this blog are genuinely interested in understanding how unbelievers (and former believers)
view Christ and Christianity.
A mess, at least, from the point of
view of anyone
who reads the interview and knows what Francis really thinks.
If you are at all interested in learning more about how and why people
who love Jesus — why long time faithful disciples
who have a high
view of Scripture with a deeply Christian ethic around sexuality — are arriving at this conclusion, I would commend to you a season of bible study and theological
reading and prayer in company with the Holy Spirit and the body of Christ.
This volume in particular is Fretheim's sweeping
view of how to
read the Old Testament in a way that makes the theology of the Old Testament reveal God as a relational being,
who seeks to love, care, and provide for His children.
The fact that different schools of thought have come to different conclusions after
reading the same bible does nt seem to register with many christians
who effectively hold to the position «My doctrine is what the bible teaches so the other
view is wrong».
The latter might be the first book to
read since it gives a Western
view of Tibet by an Austrian
who lived there after escaping from a prisoner - of - war camp in India.
I would urge anyone
who is certain that they know the Bible, all its meanings and nuances, all its historic context, to
view the film «The Bible Tells Me So» and to visit the website soulforce.org and
read what they have to say.
Since there are many new readers on this blog, and since probably everyone
who has been here longer than a year has forgotten the basic argument I am trying to present, I figured I would spend one post summarizing my
view and inviting people to go back and
read some of what I have written previously only this topic.
I am reminded of Scot McKnight's observation in The Blue Parakeet that «anyone
who thinks it is wrong for a woman to teach in church can be consistent with that point of
view only if they refuse to
read and learn from women scholars.
And from our point of
view, there's always the chance that the person
who as a scholar seriously
reads Sade will seriously
read his critics.
Helpfully, given the widespread insistence on this
reading of Francis, the Australian newspaper The Age reports that Francis has defrocked and excommunicated a priest
who holds the
views Sullivan seems to think Francis holds, if in much less overt form.
The statement that an Obama supporter would not
read this blog is jaw - dropping in its over-simplistic
view of
who the supporters of the President are.
It suggests the stronger interpretation to those
who find it congenial, but allows for a more modest
reading for anyone
who considers such
views either presumptuous or preposterous.
I recommend to anyone
who wants to make sense of the current scene a
reading of her detailing of those competing, mutually exclusive, world
views.
Or, I might
read someone
who will speak a different
view than I was taught to hold.
Studying for his doctorate at Cambridge, he began to appreciate the scholarship of his female professors, concluding that «anyone
who thinks it is wrong for a woman to teach in a church can be consistent with that point of
view only if they refuse to
read and learn from women scholars.»
Whereas the NCBCPS has a list of advisers that
reads, in Chancey's words, «like a
Who's
Who of religious, social and political conservatives,» the Bible Literacy Project seeks to represent a much broader spectrum of religious
views, and the book's reviewers and consultants include Jews as well as Christians of virtually every stripe.