Sentences with phrase «who read my views»

Not exact matches

Here are five keys to creating exceptionally strong thought leadership — the kind that gets read and viewed and goes viral — culled from executives who have it down to a science.
Here — for your reading pleasure — is a countdown of the year's most - viewed stories about far - out technologies and the entrepreneurs who are dreaming them up.
«This is especially important for children, who seem to read only for plot but are actually forming their view of the world — and of their places in it.»
«Reading can offer richer, broader and more complex models of experience, which enable people to view their own lives from a refreshed perspective and with renewed understanding,» says Josie Billington of the University of Liverpool, who's an expert on the effects of rReading can offer richer, broader and more complex models of experience, which enable people to view their own lives from a refreshed perspective and with renewed understanding,» says Josie Billington of the University of Liverpool, who's an expert on the effects of readingreading.
That notion of melding interesting, obscure or hot button topics with fan communities has proven so popular that it's lured hundreds of millions of users who generate tens of billions of page views annually, giving rise to a site slogan that plausibly reads «The front page of the internet.»
And Dave Young from Cooley who read a draft and made sure I wasn't completely off base in my views.
The marketing team is better informed as to who it wants to read or view its content.
If you're an entrepreneur or VC who wants somebody else's view on that you should read it.
Democrats will push back, but Republicans and allies of the president who agree with Trump's view that the Trump - Russia investigation is a political «witch hunt» are unlikely to be swayed by the Democrats» insistence that this memo is a politicized and cherry - picked reading of the available intelligence.
Canadian and Alberta voters need to understand that every time you get annoyed at Justin Trudeau and the way he manages the country all you need to do is listen to the radio and Charles Adler rant about him or read articles by Lorne Gunter and Rick Bell from the Edmonton Sun (who formerly worked at the Alberta Report, and helped Ted Byfield run the Alberta Report into the ditch, or read anything written by Colby Cosh or Ezra Levant and soon you will realize the propaganda and hate these clowns spread about their own political / religious views trying to scare the general population to their side or views.
Every time I get annoyed at Justin Trudeau and the way he manages the country all I do is listen to the radio and Charles Adler rant about him or read articles by Lorne Gunter and Rick Bell from the Edmonton Sun (who formerly worked at the Alberta Report, and helped Ted Byfield run the Alberta Report into the ditch, or read anything written by Colby Cosh or Ezra Levant and soon I realize the propaganda and hate these clowns try and spread about their own political / religious views I revert back to supporting the more liberal viewpoint).
About the Biz Company Name: JP Healthcare Solutions Who we talked with: Cathy Foster, Principle,... Read more View All
There are others who might even admit that I have read material they referred me to, but in any event, I am very comfortable that I am open new alternative views.
Protestants should, from this point of view, read it to be led into an otherwise often closed but nonetheless decisive discussion by a guide who is himself not Catholic but who knows the history and is sympathetic to the problems and proffered solutions.
Mr. Blake, I'm impressed to see you enter the fray here, to try to address the inability of Christian apolgists here who are apparently unable to read and / or comprehend the written word because doing so upsets their world view.
sacraments — true you probably don't need a church for them — baptism is commanded (for believers), it's special, but not neccesssarily a sacrament, it can be done by any believer, although possibly it was only the apostles who baptized (I tend to go with the baptist view on baptism, because that's what I read in the Bible.
People who read news websites and then post comments tend to have strong political views.
I've attempted to read the story as a God of Wrath, but it got complicated quick because I had to pick and choose verses and have a rather myopic view of who God is.
Those who read the Krauss article should be warned that Krauss makes a false insinuation about the views on miracles and the Virgin Birth of Br.
And the problem with praise music is that, in its attempt to be «approachable» to all, it becomes monotonous, tepid and uninspiring by comparison (at least from the point of view of someone who can sing and sight - read).
However, I still read books and articles by Calvinists and those who disagree with my views.
I read through the comments section and I am now better able to understand Danica, Catie and all others», who felt betrayed by TLS, point of view.
We get to read religious views from people who know nothing of religion and scientific views from people who have no clue about science.
You who treat the Crown of Writings As you treat no other book — Just a paragraph disjointed, Just a crude, impatient look — Try a worthier procedure, Try a broad and steady view; You will kneel in very rapture When you read the Bible through.
Try reading Karen Armstrong's History of God for a detailed analysis of how God has evolved, or people's view of God has evolved if you prefer, over history.Either God is changing, or people's views of who and what God is has changed.
The Bible can be taken literally or figuratively by anyone who reads it, and it need not be, and is usually not, viewed consistently.
Hausman had taken a more standard line on Bergson, although in the dialogue below it will be clear that Hausman is pondering in a preliminary way the very questions he has answered above.1 It must be clear to anyone who has read Hausman's paper above that his view regarding Bergson has now changed, and I think greatly to his credit, and to Gunter's.
Although no one who reads the unconventional view of causality and temporality set forth in MP will suspect me of trying to restore Aristotle, the dynamic side of the concept of ousia and its resonance with the theme of being have always been important to me.
It's easy for people who are more liberal on this issue to claim the pastoral high ground (indeed, Chalke's piece is partly pastorally motivated), but that ignores many who will be hurt to read his change of view, and what they will regard as a sharp shift from scripture.
So, no, your views are not heretical, except to those, like fishon (read — Pharisees) who think they KNOW, but can't see that they only BELIEVE.
Aside from that, I think it depends on who's biography of Luther you read (regarding Luther's self - view); some paint him as a tortured soul, others as a man of his times who was (relatively) happy to be so prior to entering the monastery.
For those who have defended the traditional interpretation of the resurrection of Jesus as an historical event involving the raising and removal of a physical body, that which has carried most weight is simply the fact that, on a plain reading of the New Testament, the Bible itself seems to give unqualified support to such a view, in some places if not in all.
Those who took issue with the article read it from their political parties world view and misconstrued the meaning.
But I think that most who read this blog are genuinely interested in understanding how unbelievers (and former believers) view Christ and Christianity.
A mess, at least, from the point of view of anyone who reads the interview and knows what Francis really thinks.
If you are at all interested in learning more about how and why people who love Jesus — why long time faithful disciples who have a high view of Scripture with a deeply Christian ethic around sexuality — are arriving at this conclusion, I would commend to you a season of bible study and theological reading and prayer in company with the Holy Spirit and the body of Christ.
This volume in particular is Fretheim's sweeping view of how to read the Old Testament in a way that makes the theology of the Old Testament reveal God as a relational being, who seeks to love, care, and provide for His children.
The fact that different schools of thought have come to different conclusions after reading the same bible does nt seem to register with many christians who effectively hold to the position «My doctrine is what the bible teaches so the other view is wrong».
The latter might be the first book to read since it gives a Western view of Tibet by an Austrian who lived there after escaping from a prisoner - of - war camp in India.
I would urge anyone who is certain that they know the Bible, all its meanings and nuances, all its historic context, to view the film «The Bible Tells Me So» and to visit the website soulforce.org and read what they have to say.
Since there are many new readers on this blog, and since probably everyone who has been here longer than a year has forgotten the basic argument I am trying to present, I figured I would spend one post summarizing my view and inviting people to go back and read some of what I have written previously only this topic.
I am reminded of Scot McKnight's observation in The Blue Parakeet that «anyone who thinks it is wrong for a woman to teach in church can be consistent with that point of view only if they refuse to read and learn from women scholars.
And from our point of view, there's always the chance that the person who as a scholar seriously reads Sade will seriously read his critics.
Helpfully, given the widespread insistence on this reading of Francis, the Australian newspaper The Age reports that Francis has defrocked and excommunicated a priest who holds the views Sullivan seems to think Francis holds, if in much less overt form.
The statement that an Obama supporter would not read this blog is jaw - dropping in its over-simplistic view of who the supporters of the President are.
It suggests the stronger interpretation to those who find it congenial, but allows for a more modest reading for anyone who considers such views either presumptuous or preposterous.
I recommend to anyone who wants to make sense of the current scene a reading of her detailing of those competing, mutually exclusive, world views.
Or, I might read someone who will speak a different view than I was taught to hold.
Studying for his doctorate at Cambridge, he began to appreciate the scholarship of his female professors, concluding that «anyone who thinks it is wrong for a woman to teach in a church can be consistent with that point of view only if they refuse to read and learn from women scholars.»
Whereas the NCBCPS has a list of advisers that reads, in Chancey's words, «like a Who's Who of religious, social and political conservatives,» the Bible Literacy Project seeks to represent a much broader spectrum of religious views, and the book's reviewers and consultants include Jews as well as Christians of virtually every stripe.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z