Competitive effects studies may have high external validity, but they have lower internal validity than RCTs, meaning we don't have as much confidence as we would with RCTs that there is a causal relationship between school choice programs and test score gains by students
who remain in public schools.
On the contrary, the Duke report noted, comparable students
who remain in public schools are scoring better than voucher students on national tests.
Flip through our complete summary of the high - quality empirical research conducted on school choice programs to date, including evidence based on students» test scores (of those using programs and
those who remain in public schools), long - term educational attainment, integration / segregation, fiscal effects and students» civic values.
«There's not ever been strong evidence that voucher students do better than students of similar incomes
who remain in the public schools,» Colvin told StateImpact in September.
The problem with vouchers in terms of student achievement is that there's not ever been strong evidence that voucher students do better than students of similar incomes
who remain in the public schools.
That is, the evidence suggests that both students who exercise choice and students
who remain in public schools benefit from school choice programs.
«Importantly, this finding helps to address the concern that such programs may hurt students
who remain in their public schools, either as a result of funds lost by those schools or the exodus of higher - performing peers.
[4] Recent research has concluded that public school students who receive vouchers to attend private schools score much lower on both reading and math tests than similar students
who remain in the public schools.
Scholars continue to disagree about other topics (such as the likely impact of a large - scale voucher program on the education of students
who remain in public schools) because the evidence assembled to date is more provisional.
First, we assess whether the private schools attended by students using state - funded vouchers offer more or less racially segregated environments than those available to students
who remain in public schools.
Statewide programs in Florida, Louisiana, and Ohio, however, already have demonstrated clear positive effects on the achievement of students
who remain in public schools, confirming Caroline Hoxby's claim (see «Rising Tide,» features, Winter 2001) that competition from choice generates «a rising tide that lifts all boats.»
And special education vouchers even improve the quality of services for the disabled students
who remain in public schools because those schools risk losing students to the voucher program if they do not serve the students well.
Even voucher advocates would agree that, because private school choice is costly under the current system, parents who go private are likely to be more socially advantaged than parents
who remain in the public schools.
Recent analysis of the widely followed voucher experiment in Milwaukee shows that low - income minority students who attended private schools scored substantially better in reading and math after four years than
those who remained in public schools.
In Washington, for example, the average class size attended by students who switched to private school was 18, compared with 22 for
those who remained in public school.
An emotionally disturbed student who requires private placement, for example, is likely to be more challenging and expensive to educate than the average emotionally disturbed student
who remains in public schools.
After two years, African - American students who used a voucher to enroll in a private school scored 6.3 percentile points higher than African - American students
who remained in public schools.
The state had already required FTC scholarship students to participate in standardized testing using a nationally normed exam chosen by each private school; a study commissioned by the Florida Department of Education found that, in 2007 — 08, their academic gains were similar to students nationally across all income levels and to similar Florida students
who remained in public schools.
After one year, the results show that students who used a scholarship to attend a private school scored 5.9 percentile points higher on the math section of the ITBS than comparable students
who remained in public schools.
In Ohio, the findings were positive: The introduction of voucher competition modestly improved the outcomes of students
who remained in their public schools — in the range of one - eighth of the magnitude of the black - white test - score gap.
While there is no indication of racial motivation among the Indiana lawmakers who created the voucher program, the effects are clear: Indiana's voucher program increasingly benefits higher - income white students, many of whom are already in private schools, and diverts funding from all other students
who remain in the public school system.
A recent Education Department analysis of that program found that after a year in private school, voucher recipients performed worse on standardized tests than their counterparts
who remained in public school.
If the funding diverted per ESA student were less than $ 6,453, then the average funding per student
who remains in public school would rise — yielding a net positive impact.
Indiana students who received vouchers to attend a private school actually moved backward on reading and math tests compared with students
who remained in public school.
These subsidies have not only improved education for the students who attend the schools of choice, but study after study has shown that kids
who remain in public school also benefit when a voucher system is instituted and schools are forced to compete for students.
Earlier this year, the Brookings Institution, a public policy think tank, found that students participating in state voucher programs are performing worse on assessments than similar students
who remained in public schools.
More than 34,000 Indiana students received vouchers in the 2016 - 17 school year.12 The study used a matching methodology to compare the test scores of students who transferred to participating voucher schools with similar students
who remained in public schools.
Not exact matches
Deplore as we may the existence of the parochial
school, its challenge to the separation of church and state, and its attempted inroads on the
public treasury, the fact
remains that parochial
schools exist primarily because Catholic parents,
who pay their
public -
school taxes, think it worth while to submit to additional cost and often to much inconvenience to see to it that their children receive the religious instruction denied them
in the
public schools.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo,
who had indicated support for the Senate's effort to expand charter
schools, has not made a
public appearance
in Albany this week,
remaining behind closed doors negotiating with lawmakers.
I am not going to prevent any parent
who currently has their child
in public school the opportunity to have their child
remain in public school until the terminal grade.
But Kolb says he knows talks are going on about the top two
remaining issues, renewing New York City's rent laws and an education tax credit for donors
who give up to a million dollars to fund scholarships for poor children
in private
schools and fund afterschool activities at
public schools.
A divided state Board of Regents on Sept. 16 proposed three changes to the state evaluation system aimed at making the process fairer: an appeals process to address aberrations
in growth scores, ensuring that privacy protections to bar the release to the
public of individual teachers» growth scores will
remain in force and the creation of a hardship waiver for
school districts
who find it difficult to hire outside evaluators.
But Burke,
who now teaches at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg
School of
Public Health,
remains concerned about the move,
in light of previous actions by Pruitt that he thinks have weakened EPA's Scientific Advisory Board and put the independence of the agency's chemical assessment program at risk.
In particular, we take advantage of the lottery - based admissions process for charter schools to compare the academic performance of two groups of students: those who wanted to attend a charter school and were randomly admitted and those who wanted to attend but were not admitted and remained in traditional public school
In particular, we take advantage of the lottery - based admissions process for charter
schools to compare the academic performance of two groups of students: those
who wanted to attend a charter
school and were randomly admitted and those
who wanted to attend but were not admitted and
remained in traditional public school
in traditional
public schools.
Working with data from the State of Florida, I have regularly noticed that achievement gains by students
who move from one
public school to another badly trail the gains of students
who remain in the same
school — even after one has adjusted for many family background characteristics.
Warm results arrived this past winter
in New York City from Stanford University economist Caroline Hoxby,
who detailed how students winning slots via lotteries
in over-subscribed charters out - performed applicants
who remained in regular
public schools.
For teachers
who expect to
remain in the
public schools for longer periods of time, the MA degree represents a potentially sound upfront investment to increase their lifetime earnings.
The same Stanford researcher conducted an RCT of charter
schools in Chicago and found: «students
in charter
schools outperformed a comparable group of lotteried - out students
who remained in regular Chicago
public schools by 5 to 6 percentile points
in math and about 5 percentile points
in reading....
The nondisabled students
who remain in D.C.
public schools lack the same mechanism for exiting failing
schools.
Looking separately at the effect of attending a charter
school for exiters reveals that the effect of attending a charter
school is,
in fact, considerably more negative than for students
who were observed first
in a traditional
public school and
remained in a charter
school throughout the study period (see Figure 2).
Second, students
who choose to
remain in charter
schools do not continue to make smaller gains than students
in traditional
public schools after their initial year
in a charter
school.
This means that the Milwaukee attainment analysis almost certainly underestimated the benefits of
remaining in private
schools throughout high
school by diluting the private
school group with students
who transferred to
public schools.
What Ravitch does not understand is that this is an «intention to treat» analysis,
in which all students
who started
in private
schools via the voucher program are counted as if they had
remained there, even if they transferred into
public high
schools.
Chanin could only reply: «There is no evidence that competition improves the lot for the 96 percent of the students
who remain in the troubled Cleveland
public school system with less resources and even worse problems.»
Although the identities of the girls
remain undisclosed, the fact that they attended the same
school as the three girls
who are believed to have travelled to Syria last month, was argued as
in the
public interest and was revealed.
None of the independent studies performed of the most lauded and long standing voucher programs extant
in the U.S. — Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Cleveland, Ohio; and Washington, D.C. — found any statistical evidence that children
who utilized vouchers performed better than children
who did not and
remained in public schools.
As NPR's Cory Turner reports, the study finds that
public school students
in Indiana
who used a voucher to switch to a private
school tended to backslide academically after switching
schools, but if the students
remained in the private
school long enough, their performance improved.
Students
who remain somewhere
in the Chicago
public school system (including charter
schools) appear
in our database, making them «observed noncompliers.»
They concluded that students enrolled
in Detroit charter
schools were significantly outpacing a demographically similar set of matched students
who remained in traditional Detroit
public schools.
In an essay that is sure to provoke both those
who want
schools to advance patriotic values and those
who preach social change, Murphy argues that
public schools should focus on teaching students the knowledge and skills necessary to be intellectually engaged citizens, while
remaining neutral on questions of civic values.