Sentences with phrase «who respects the rule of law»

The president could openly use this as basis to tell Ghanaians that he is someone who respects the rule of law...» The Supreme Court last week sentenced two radio panelists, Alistair Tairo Nelson and Godwin Ako Gunn, and a radio show hosts, Salifu Maase, aka Mugabe, to four month in prison and a fine of GHC10, 000 each for criminal contempt.

Not exact matches

The speech lists five key fundamentals that should stand Australia in good stead: a strong institutional framework (including the rule of law, respect for property rights, a well - functioning public administration, and a well - established regulatory system); our people, who are diverse, well educated, have a «can do» mentality and a demonstrated capability for adjusting to change; a large endowment of mineral resources; large tracts of agricultural land and an ability to produce high - quality clean food; and an established services industry with the potential for considerable expansion as average incomes in Asia rise.

To those who can not agree with the proposition that individuals have a moral or constitutional right to kill the unborn, or that such a right defines the trans - generational covenant of the American political order, the Court urged acceptance out of respect for the rule of law.

The Tory Party must also show that it is the party best able to protect us from those who wish to destroy everything we believe in and from those who have no respect for the rule of law.

«If not for anything at all, the President is someone who believes in the rule of law and that is a man that I respect.

«Obedience to the rule of law by all citizens but more particularly those who publicly took oath of office to protect and preserve the Constitution is a desideratum to good governance and respect for the rule of law.

«Obedience to the rule of law by all citizens, but more particularly those who publicly took oath of office to protect and preserve the constitution, is a desideratum to good governance and respect for the rule of law.

To recognize people who have promoted a better understanding and respect for the rule of law, many bar associations also hold award luncheons or dinners.

Moreover, it is apparent from the case - law -LSB-...] that the legislation indicated «that property not belonging to private persons shall be administered and alienated according to the specific rules applicable to them; that, in respect of property belonging to public entities, even those pursuing industrial and commercial activities, the principle of non-seizability of that property precludes recourse to private - law enforcement remedies; that only the creditor who has obtained an enforceable favourable judicial decision having acquired the force of res judicata and ordering a public entity to pay, even provisionally, an amount of money, may have enforced the specific rules [applicable].

The re-emergence of totalitarianism and racism in Europe, Brexit in England and the astonishing vitriolic attacks on the High Court Justices who decided that Parliament needed to approve it, the erosion of membership in the International Criminal Court, the rejection of refugees, the threat to civil liberties in Turkey, the re-emergence of the Russian bear, the destruction of Syria, the universal fear of ISIS and terrorism all cry out for a need for dialogue and collaboration to secure the rule of law and respect for human rights.

Both solutions will occur because the power of the news media and of the internet, interacting, will quickly make widely known these types of information, the cumulative effect of which will force governments and the courts to act: (1) the situations of the thousands of people whose lives have been ruined because they could not obtain the help of a lawyer; (2) the statistics as to the increasing percentages of litigants who are unrepresented and clogging the courts, causing judges to provide more public warnings; (3) the large fees that some lawyers charge; (4) increasing numbers of people being denied Legal Aid and court - appointed lawyers; (5) the many years that law societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this problem which continues to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the unauthorized practice of law» because they tried to help others desperately in need of a lawyer whom they couldn't afford to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among law firms that could cause them to lower their fees; (8) that law societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision of legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable cost.

OTOH I probably respect the request more if I DO have to write... The ABA Section of Business Law has pretty stringent rules for the originality and usefulness of materials — at least in principle — partly because the people who allow lawyers to claim CLE credit for the sessions look at the materials in deciding if the sessions qualify (again, at least in principle).

With respect to deceased individuals, the final rule describes when a covered entity must allow a person who otherwise is permitted under applicable law to act with respect to the interest of the decedent or on behalf of the decedent's estate, to make decisions regarding the decedent's protected health information.

A party who disagrees with the decision of a family law arbitrator still has the right to appeal the ruling of a family law arbitrator either on the basis that the arbitrator made an error of law, or that the arbitrator made an error with respect to a mixed question of law and fact.

The ruling comes after the Law Society of Upper Canada applied for a declaration that the Law Society Act applies to employees of the Crown (in right of Ontario) who provide legal services, and that Crown employees who provide legal services to the public respecting employer conduct prohibited by the OHSA are not exempt from the LSA paralegal licensing requirement (Bylaw 4).

In the blog post Gardner, who is a Professor of Jurisprudence at Oxford, sketches his argument that we should adopt the «assymetrical interpretation of the rule of law,» which requires officialdom to observe the laws scrupulously while allowing citizens greater lattitutde in that respect.

The two person rule in respect of establishing the public element of the offence of outraging public decency contrary to the common law can be satisfied if there were two or more people present who were capable of seeing the nature of the act, even if they did not actually see it.