I am not going to pat the ass of a guy
who responds to a review he / she doesn't agree with by suggesting the reviewer «hates movies» and «needs a hug.»
Not exact matches
Not only will merchants need
to make a more concerted effort
to solicit
reviews, but also
respond to both negative and positive
reviews, perhaps even offering rewards
to reviewers
who offer valuable insight into their buying or product use experience.
The idea of a successful human being, and a successful entrepreneur and a happy person, is a person
who responds to things when things change,
who flows along the opportunity that is presented and then
reviews the plans and continues
to evolve and improve.
The Employees» Choice Awards is based on the input of employees
who choose
to provide feedback (at least 1,000 must
respond) on their job, work environment, and company via an anonymous online company
review survey.
In a paper last year, Agarwal
reviewed data from a major financial institution of people
who'd
responded to such offers, and how they'd behaved.
Buckley was never a professional Catholic, in the sense of someone
who made his living from the fact of his faith, and his standing as a Catholic commentator may have declined when, in 1961, National
Review responded to John XXIII's encyclical on Christianity and social progress, Mater et Magistra, with an unsigned quip: «Mater si, Magistra no» (though most reports now ascribe it
to a hotshot young writer at the magazine named Garry Wills.)
I then sent it along
to two psychotherapy colleagues
to review who both
responded with shock, «Andrea, this title and photo are incredibly inappropriate!
Respond to the national curriculum
review: http://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/what-you-can-do-
to-help/
respond-
to-the-national-curriculum-
review/ Read more about the BHA's campaigns work on PSHE and Sex and Relationships Education: http://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/schools-and-education/school-curriculum/pshe-and-sex-and-relationships-education/ The British Humanist Association is the national charity working on behalf of non-religious people
who seek
to live ethical and fulfilling lives on the basis of reason and humanity.
The governor
responded by proposing a «chief procurement officer» and some new inspectors general
who would answer
to him and be responsible for
reviewing contracts.
A Slave
to the Systems Hedy Kober,
who runs Yale University's Clinical and Affective Neuroscience Lab and co-authored a 2016 research
review on how we
respond to food, sums it up: «Food cues.
GF mice have been shown
to have increased plasma tryptophan concentrations, 47, 48 which can be normalized following post-weaning colonization.47 Resident gut bacteria can utilize tryptophan for growth229 and in some cases, production of indole, 230, 231 or serotonin (
reviewed by O'Mahony and colleagues95), while the microbiota might also affect tryptophan availability by influencing host enzymes responsible for its degradation.47 By limiting the availability of tryptophan for serotonin production in the CNS (EC - derived serotonin does not cross the BBB), the gut microbiota could influence serotonergic neurotransmission.95 In vulnerable populations, reducing the circulating concentrations of tryptophan has been shown
to affect mood, and
to reinstate depressive symptoms in patients
who have successfully
responded to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.232, 233 The gut microbiota could also influence the production of both neuroprotective and neurotoxic components of the kynurenine pathway.224
I think there are scientists
who have refuted some of Campbell's claims — Denise has quoted some of them — but in general scientists
respond to papers within the peer -
reviewed literature.
I haven't seen the longer version (the Playlist correspondent
who wrote the
review of the TIFF cut is in Cannes, and will be writing on the differences between the two soon), so it's hard
to say if I would have
responded to that any differently, but for all of the excellent qualities displayed in the acting and filmmaking, it never quite punched me in the gut in the way I wanted it
to.
She writes a test
review question on a piece of paper, wads it into a paper ball, and tosses it
to a student
who opens the paper,
responds to the question and tosses it back.
Based on rigorous research
reviewed by the National Center on RTI at the American Institutes for Research, the authors highlight several recommendations for implementing RTI with fidelity: 1) Institute a continuum of instructional supports for students through a multi-level prevention system, including primary prevention through high quality core instruction in the classroom, secondary prevention through supplementary interventions of moderate intensity for students most at risk, and tertiary prevention through individualized interventions for those
who do not
respond to secondary prevention approaches; 2) employ universal screening through brief, valid and reliable assessments; and 3) monitor student progress using research - based assessment tools.
Applications went through four levels of screening by
review teams composed of researchers, teachers, policy makers, and administrators,
who looked at school practices that fell into categories such as create and maintain healthy school culture; broaden and enrich school curriculum; use a variety of assessments designed
to respond to student needs; and support teachers as professionals.
Blog about it — Using blogs is one of the best ways
to interact; using a blog allows you
to: — Get instant feedback from
reviews, and what those
who read and
respond to your blog post have
to say about your work, and future work you have done.
I have a
review (that I did not
respond to... the reviewer obviously was someone
who a) had not read my book and b) was ignorant enough
to post a
review anyway) in which someone calls me horrible names for the way I described treating my autistic son in my non-fiction book.
For that matter, I rarely
respond to a good
review on GR or Amazon because I was given guidance by several of my friends,
who are also NYT bestselling authors,
to never
respond.
Lothlorien,
who first wrote about this practice in 2012 for Digital Book World in an article called «When You Wish Upon a Star, You Get the Pointy End (Part 1): Why Authors Should ALWAYS
Respond To Negative Reviews,» was surprised by the venomous response to her suggestion that this level of interaction between authors and reviewers is actually good for book
To Negative
Reviews,» was surprised by the venomous response
to her suggestion that this level of interaction between authors and reviewers is actually good for book
to her suggestion that this level of interaction between authors and reviewers is actually good for books.
If after I accepted the
review and that author never
responded back or never sent the book, I would then transfer the email
to a list I was keeping for authors
who sent requests and never sent the books.
(2) Authors
who take the bait and
respond to the libel in a
review — hell, authors
who make any response whatsoever
to a
review, no matter how civil or justified the response might be — deserve
to be destroyed, and the whole Internet needs
to know that this author is a walking well of excrement
who does not deserve
to be read by anyone.
In my experience as a fledgling indie author over the past six months or so,
review blogs are one of two possible types: too big
to even
respond to a query, or so small that they are suspect as actual
review blogs vs. people
who just want free books.
Robert Trahan
responds here
to Amazon Reader
Reviews: 12 Things Everybody and His Grandmother Needs
to Know by Anne R. Allen,
who seems
to have heard from everybody and their grandfathers about it.
She
responded to a comment I made about my Aunt (
who was Ms. Atlanta one year) having faith in the AJC
reviews, so I don't believe it was a generic letter, but her last sentence was heartbreaking, «If your work was published by a «major» publishing house, we «might consider»
reviewing it.»
This discussion began in response
to authors
who either
responded negatively
to reviews of their books that they didn't think were warranted, often attacking the reviewer, or
who spammed the different discussion boards with promotions for their books.
In their eyes, authors
who respond to poor
reviews come across as unprofessional, she says.
Even those book bloggers
who have found themselves trying
to review a rambling, unedited and obviously unfinished manuscript will
respond positively
to a polite, well written, targeted query.
«In general, participants
who respond to the educational programs are more likely
to make a change
to their asset allocation, increase their savings rates and
review their retirement plan.»
This game
review was precipitated by a request from a Mass Deduction reader
who responded to a request for games that readers were curious about and wanted
reviewed by simply saying «Magical Cube!!».
Younger artists
who are continuing
to pay attention
to the relevant social changes that have occurred after 1989 are invited not only
to review the last almost three decades of history, but also
to respond to current realities.
And that climate scientists waiting for peer
review articles as a way
to cautiously
respond to criticism is froth with weakness exploitable by those
who could not care less about it.
Gee Aye: «Author pays» journals are simply the free market
responding to the capture and monopolization of the «Standard» journals by cliques of «Pal
review» researchers — often those whose money is from govenment grants and
who see this monopolization as necessary
to defend their revenue stream (see numerous examples in the «Climategate» papers.
How do you
respond to the many commentators
who feel the
Review is fatally tarnished by the resignation of one panel member and the comments of Bouiton?
Just under half of almost 200 in - house lawyers
who responded to the latest Big Question survey said they did not agree with Deutsche's stipulation that firms appointed in the bank's latest panel
review will not be paid for work done by newly qualified (NQ) lawyers or trainees.
The former minister,
who piloted the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) through the Lords, was
responding to a letter from lawyers and campaigners repeating calls for a promised
review of the legislation.
More reputable
review sites all0w the person
reviewed to respond — but of course
who is believed can't be legislated.