Sentences with phrase «who ruled on matters»

For in a very real sense, the hatred for art that now assumes the guise of so «called avant «garde art is rooted in that same iconoclastic polemic that animates every syllable of Plato and Nietzsche, not to mention a host of other art critics (in the literal sense of that word) from Origen, St. Augustine, and Blaise Pascal to those Russian commissars of art who ruled on matters of taste by diktat and ukase.

Not exact matches

The Rule allows any shareholder who holds $ 2,000 or 1 percent worth of a company's stock — for a period of one year — to submit a non-binding shareholder proposal on any subject matter that they please.

On March 6, 2018, Judge Jack B. Weinstein of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled that virtual currencies are commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and therefore subject to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) anti-fraud and anti-manipulation enforcement authority.1 Granting the CFTC's request for a preliminary injunction against the defendants who allegedly engaged in deception and fraud involving virtual currency spot markets, Judge Weinstein noted that «[u] ntil Congress clarifies the matter,» the CFTC has «concurrent authority» along with other state and federal administrative agencies and civil and criminal courts over transactions in virtual currency.2

you really have to dig thru some sh-t to get to the gems, modern christians who claim the founding fathers on their side should keep this in mind, these men where largely liberal intellectuals with a practical bent and where not the judeo / christian zealots that some try and make them out to be, jeffersons take on jesus is wonderful and it is useful in the modern world where we really need to focus more on the lessons of jesus than THE RULES in the entire bible, as jesus said ABOVE ALL ELSE love neighbor as yourself, jefferson had a great mind and his approach to spiritual matters like this is great

Neville i mentioned those people only because the discussion was talking about dominionism the combination of the church and state as a governing rule all those people were government leaders all of them suffered in there own way.Its was the suffering that prepared them for the roles that they were to play and there faith in God was what helped them get through.We are made stronger in our weakness no matter how important or unimportant we may appear to others.I guess it is easy to fall into the lie about political involvement that its hard to make change but some people have had a huge impact.Really it is God who deserves the praise he is the one that creats the opportunitys to make impact on the world as in our strength we can do nothing.In hebrews the great men and woman of faith there are those that seemed unimportant to the world and many suffered for there faith Our Lord knows everyone by name and every small act of faith we do he remembers because we do it out of our love for him that is what the christian walk is about living for Jesus and sharing that love with others.brentnz.

Any person on this earth who commits a crime needs to be held accountable, it does not matter if your a police officer, fireman, news broadcaster, famous celebrity, priest, monk, factory worker, or cashier, you are a citizen of a country, each country has rules, each person is answerable to these rules.

Christian the most two faced and fakes of all religion there is.people that like to rule everyone and judge no matter who u are or what u believe i myself is proud pagan.so go on with ur judge others cause that all u people know to do.and the companys just do ur bussiness.just leave the debate the ones in officess

But the DRC has rules and procedures, and one of them is that candidates who don't pre-interview don't get voted on at the straw poll — no matter who they are or how popular they might be.

On Wednesday, King Carl XVI Gustaf, the academy's patron, who said he had followed the matter «with great concern,» announced that he had changed the academy's rules to allow members to leave, and to allow the panel to replace any member who had been inactive for two years.

De Blasio, who has retained a personal lawyer and recently submitted a $ 10 million legal contract for a white collar law firm to represent the city in the matter — on the taxpayers» dime — maintained that he did everything by the rules.

He said the trial court had become functus - officio to grant such request to the defendant who he said had yet to appeal previous rulings that were delivered against him on the same subject matter.

The judge who will rule on the matter, state Supreme Court Judge Lisa Fisher — who was elected in a 2014 upset running as a Republican — noted at one point that there is «a thin line on whether the court can hear this case.»

All this from a man who was the public face of probity in the second chamber — he was chair of the privileges and conduct committee, which rules on disciplinary matters and can recommend the suspension of peers.

Dr Bawumia who contributed significantly to the NPP's victory in 2016, was a veritable pain in the neck of the then ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC) with his analysis on matters of the economy and jabs on campaign platforms.

It, therefore, comes as a surprise that INEC, which was a party to the matter, can not advise political parties on the right course to take but, instead, continues to encourage politicians to embark on illegal actions through active participation of its officials, who are sent to observe such illegal primaries, whereas the apex court in the land has ruled on such matter.

Lamberth, who ordered a temporary ban on federal funding for human embryonic stem cells research last August that an appeals court later overturned, is expected to issue a final ruling on the matter as soon as this summer.

Further complicating matters, Hayes says, are the many bureaucratic rules and traditions enforced at the school, district and state level, including teacher evaluations based on student test scores, extensive federal reporting requirements, and curricula that «tell teachers what to teach and when and for how long no matter who the students are in front of them.»

Derek Redelman, who watches education policy for the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, says the new rules place more focus on educators knowing the subject matter they teach.

To make matters worse, you need to follow different «rules» and use a different type of query letter template depending on what your query letter is about, and who you're sending it to.

U.S. District Judge Denise Cote, who ruled against the tech company on the matter in 2013 when she found Apple guilty, recently called the structuring of the settlement «highly unusual.»

While you may occasionally stumble on hounds who have earned obedience titles, no matter how much training they receive, most hounds» lives will remain for the most part ruled by their noses.

On the general failure of the «creative disruption» notion that if you have enough money, the rules won't matter — a caution that guy who dumped all that iron sulfate into the Pacific didn't get.

As a rule, I see no benefit to those involved in a trial of an autopsy on a control group member, no matter who pays for it.

By ruling on narrow matters of standing, the court leaves Cuccinelli uncensured and free to harass scientists who have ever been at private schools and private nonprofits in the state at any time in the past.

CASE: In one case, the author worked together with a lawyer who had done extensive research on rulings in matters of automobile concessions.

Paul Bains, the lawyer who leveraged DocuSign for bankruptcy petitions and other important matters, used the software in place of original signatures as is done in many commercial settings in the US and globally.Judge Robert Bardwil of the U.S. Bankruptcy court in California ruled that while DocuSign is appropriate in many business settings, overall it does not constitute as a replacement for original signatures on legal documents and the like.

Note that court rules and procedures have yet to be amended to specifically address some of the issues raised in the unbundling context (e.g., communicating with counsel who is only handling some issues on a matter; dealing with a client under a disability; going on or off the record; or the ghost - writing of pleadings).

We then had a hearing before a judge who issued an ruling confirming that I would not be allowed to address the court on this matter at any time.

But, if your client is effectively «deputized» or becomes a «de facto» agent of the state who is called up to be a member of a posse for the police, for example, by using an agreed symbol such as shining a light with a symbol on it on some clouds, at that point, with respect to that matter, the 4th Amendment exclusionary rule and Miranda probably do apply to evidence that your client obtains, and exclusion of that kind of evidence could make prosecution much more difficult, unless the prosecution can successfully make an argument that the other evidence that the illegally obtained evidence leads them to is not «fruit of the poisonous tree» because it would have inevitably been discovered in due course using only the legally obtained evidence.

Where you have employed in - house legal counsel who communicates with client company employees on a matter of legal concern, the rules governing the attorney - client privilege (or a foreign law counterpart) might well be different in — for instance — the European Union's legal system as compared with the U.S.

And this morning, Peter Lattman of the Wall Street Journal Law Blog had the scoop on a «hot off the presses» ruling by federal district court Judge Lewis Kaplan, who found that that prosecutors violated the constitutional rights of a group of former KPMG partners in pressuring the firm not to advance them legal fees (I originally blogged about the matter here in the context of how much we should expect corporations to stand up for customer or employee rights when government comes knocking on the corporate door).

On March 23, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada released the ruling in R v Carson, 2018 SCC 12 where Justice Andromache Karakatsanis, writing for an 8 - 1 majority, held that everyone commits the offence of influence peddling under s. 121 (1)(d) of the Code who: (a) has influence with the government; (b) demands a benefit; (c) as consideration for the exercise of influence; (d) in connection with any matter of business relating to the government.

Members of our international team have developed longstanding and trusted relationship with foreign firms who they can call upon, when necessary, for advice on local judicial rules and other matters.

Lord Justice Gross, who provided the ruling, described the case as a matter which has had tragic consequences for the families on either side.

If the mayor is granted the stay, the matter of who should replace him — either through a byelection or by appointment — will be placed on hold until a court rules on the appeal.

1) we agree to disagree:) 2) supremacy of EU law for the EU system is the equivalent of the hard core of constitutional values that some national Courts defend against EU (and ECHR)- it is not a matter of «legitimacy» or «patriotism» but of using a «lower rank» instrument (accession treaty) to interfere with a treaty rule: the identical issue is for States who have a «rigid» constitution (alike the Treaty binds the CIEU): the accession treaty to ECHR or EU has a «lower rank» than the Constitution itself, so that the national Constitutional Court can not accept it can derogate to a higher ranking rule - usually they will find a way to reconcile the «construction» of the two set of rules, but if they are requested of an opinion on the point of principle, they will always say that in the very end, if all other paths have been explored to avoid the conflict, eventually it is the Constitution and neither ECHR nor EUwhich prevails.

The Federal Circuit in the second half of this year issued three separate rulings on the limits of abstract subject matter and has managed to further confuse (who knew that was even possible?)

When I explained how much the trip mattered to me, she even changed into a real ally; she broke a rule by giving me a seat on a flight that was theoretically blocked.I was the psychiatrist, but she was the one who had completely mastered the emotions of the conversation.

To fill you in a bit more on what's happening with drones and where they might fit in with real estate once the FAA comes out with its rules, REALTOR ® Magazine sat down with NAR's regulatory analyst who's following the matter for his take on the rules and the timeline.