Sentences with phrase «who saw the obvious»

This is a former Republican who see the obvious..

I'm not suggesting that he's about to send the State Police across the Hudson to annex the Meadowlands in New Jersey, but am I the only person who sees the obvious parallels between New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and Russian President Vladimir Putin?

What makes Musk unique is that he is a visionary who sees an obvious business opportunity more clearly than everyone else and simply decides to go for it.

The big guys» departure, prompted by federal regulation limiting their merchant fees, left room for the banking small fry, who see the obvious: Debit cards are in everyone's pockets, accounting for nearly 50 percent more noncash transactions than credit cards.

Not exact matches

There are obvious consequences to drinking on the clock: A study from the Journal of Consumer Psychology found that prospective hires who ordered a glass of wine during an interview were seen as less intelligent than those who abstained — even when the interviewer was indulging in a drink.

You can still go back and you can look on the Zillow blog and see posts that I wrote, and Stan, who by this point had become our chief economist, wrote about how it was obvious, in our opinion, that housing was going to crash and that it was built on the foundation of sand and there was too much easy credit that had allowed people to buy homes who really couldn't afford them.

If you're an advertiser who drives website traffic through pay - per - click (PPC) ads, you may or may not see a small decline in your click - through rate (CTR) as paid ad listings become more obvious to search users.

Still, at least to those of us who have seen the dark side, it's fairly obvious advantages experience brings in times like these.

I see this on a regular basis like the founders — Josh Mangel & Aaron Peck — at Skurt who are asking the obvious question of why renting a car an airport sucks so badly.

Given how long it takes to see the fruits of any significant research effort (Apple's latest iPhone chip was eight years in the making), the risk to research and innovation from activists who force deep cuts to drive up the share price and then sell out before the pipeline dries up is obvious.

This is exactly the type of price action we actually like to see during periods of consolidation, as it serves to shake out the «weak hands» who typically sell when stocks and ETFs break obvious technical levels of price support.

Of course, this is very obvious, but I've seen so many regular coworkers who skip the events that are taking place within their communities.

During 2001 - 2004 and again since 2008, the Fed felt free to encourage rapid increases in the supplies of money and credit because there were no obvious negative «price inflation» consequences to be seen by those who fixate on price indices such as the CPI.

But as a person who never thought Rush Limbaugh (in the 1990s) or Glenn Beck (in the 2000s) ever said much that should have been taken seriously by anyone (but who has simultaneously seen these selfsame characters taken seriously despite the obvious surface objections to them), Hunstman may not be caught in the snares of his own hunt for the presidency yet.

It's so obvious — which is great because they don't want it to be obvious, but to those who pay attention it's easy to see, — it's great because it discredits many of the critical stories on the Church that's out there...

It's easy to see individual sins and their aggregate effect alienating people from one another and from God in Sandtown: shooting another human being or stealing to buy drugs are obvious as are landlords who won't deal with lead paint or officers who don't strap prisoners down in the van.

As it should be obvious to anyone who saw this portion of the debate, Bachmann did not answer this question.

those who have already decided that God does not exist and that all processes must have a naturalistic explanation, do not see the obvious evidence that the universe was designed, rather than happened by chance.

That we do in fact try to escape from this tension is the most obvious fact of the modern world, for those who have eyes to see.

What I'm saying, in the example of Mother Theresa, is that it is blatantly obvious by the accounts of many who have seen these «hospitals» that the money she was given was not used to «ease the pain» of the dying poor.

The reasons are complex, but this seen is obvious to me: people are fed up with leaders and friends who talk learnedly and officiously about God but show little evidence of being interested in God.

it is obvious even to those who are not particularly bright, yet they can even see!

Yeah but the reality is the to thing are closely related, If Wenger stays we won't win the league or the champions league any time soon.For us to win these type of trophies a top coach must come in, there aren't many who can achieve this but i believe 2 good candidates are out of work Ancelotti and Klopp, Wengrs contract should be finished by the 2016/17 season god willing.I say God willing because Wengers been talking about how he doesn't want to retire, obvious signs that he wants an extension to his contrct, i am one Arsenal fan who doesn't want to see an extension

Add David Luis for 30 and drag his Brazil boy Lucas for 20 and Sanchez seing this will extend, just pay him 25 in combine bonus and salary... It's not about winter or summer window but who we need and smart moves when we best timing which we fail to in everyway for years... I'm keep pointing since summer window a such obvious stunner potential star for arsenal attack named Dembele at Celtic, as Lukaku, Everton after him... He'll be like Cantona or Ibra for Arsenal, not Henry but as shinning.

With that in mind, I will attempt to address some of the myths propagated by those enduring Wenger loyalists who can't seem to see what has become blatantly obvious to most outside observers.

They are really gelling and it's obvious to everyone who sees them play week in and week out.

2) We saw the games, where, you're right, it was painfully obvious who was better.

While I agree we have a lot of players who need to step up or get sold, to put it kindly I also wonder how much Wenger can do as a manager to arrange all of it to happen, we have seen how Jenks didn't get sold and Wenger has made it perfectly obvious he isn't wanted.

Especially with him in particular — a guy who has impressive film that, when you watch it, it isn't at all difficult to see the obvious reasons why people like him.

How come the most of Arsenal supporters can see the obvious frailties in weegors choice of central defender but the man who is being paid 8 mill has no idea and his weegorites are still followers of his every word.

Perhaps the most obvious beneficiaries from Durant's injury are the Cleveland Cavaliers, who saw their odds of winning the title improve from +360 to +250 at Bookmaker.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Now that the issue is much more prominent than with the Bruin player, I would love to see another front - page piece from the hockey editor reinforcing the seemingly obvious ideals that the office is bigger than the person who currently holds it, and that if one really wishes to see a decline in political divisiveness and overheated rhetoric, one has an obligation to make personal contributions to those ends.

Anyone who looks at the current League table can see that we are in a dogfight to get into the Top Four and they can also see that the Gunners have conceded more goals (26) than anyone else in the top 7 places in the table so it obvious that our ageing back line needs some steel to help us stop conceding sloppy goals from defensive errors.

Apart from the obvious that we all agree that this team is a bunch of fill ins that is an abarisment to us fans who pay top money to see a mix of players who apart from Ozil, Monreal Welbeck, Awobi, Campbell, players that week in week out don't perform to the standard that used to be Arsenal.

I know it's a negative comment but interested to see who people think are the weakest links in the team, For me I would say Wilshere & Arteta, For obvious reasons Mikel given he has very little if any physical presence to dominate the centre of the park and Jack purely because it seems our style just does not suite the lad..

Many can see the obvious simplistic failings of our team, but we seem to have a manager who refuses to carry out the obvious (like having enough defenders) year in year out.

A man who left us for dead and joined inter at the prime of his career where he gave his best yrs and won all that was winnable is doing what at arsenal when even his legs can not take it any longer??? A guy who shd be seeing out the last phase of his career at NY redbull, China or wherever is at arsenal doing what?it's nowdays arsenal where deadwoods as this are pushing time when it's obvious they have nothing left to offer!reaching even round 16 must be a luxury for us!!!

even when he suffered a serious knee injury, instead of accepting the fact that he would never stick his legs into the spaces that were crucial for someone with straight ahead speed to succeed, the club actually contemplated giving him a chance to play up top where his lack of physicality, size and holding up play talents would been on display for all to see... these are not the actions of a club that really cares about winning at the highest levels, but they are the actions of a club that wasn't interested in spending the necessary resources to purchases a world - class striker, which is usually the most expensive position on the pitch... instead we adopted the horrible phrase «like a new signing» and proceeded to allow this ridiculous experiment to carry on, which ultimately caused some discomfort on the training pitch and inside the locker room as players battled for a position that shouldn't have been theirs for the taking in the first place... don't get me wrong, I believe that Walcott is a talented player, who can help a team reach their goals, if their goals are relatively modest... just look at the teams who supposedly expressed interest in his services and they weren't the kind of clubs who aspire to win at the highest levels... as for the reasons why he hasn't been bitching and moaning about moving on just look at the wage benefits he receives from our club and his obvious desire to enjoy the societal advantages that come with playing in North London for a club with worldwide appeal... so instead of continuing to try to fix a coat with a broken zipper simply move on and buy a new and better coat

But the demand for the position is so high that anyone who's an obvious talent sees their value wildly inflated.

Ok now i know better not to bring in facts to conversations with deluded idiots who cant hear or see the obvious because their heads are so far up Arsene's crack.

I think we've got good balance now obvious areas that still could be improved and maybe a couple of players who could move on I.e. Rosicky and Flamini with Rosicky I love him but I can't see him getting much game time and I think Wenger will always go for players who are the future over him unfortunately not denying he's quality but maybe time to move on.

Every player errs, and if a player is seeing more of the ball and attempting more plays, well then it is obvious he will err a little bit more than someone who is trying less.

It's obvious that he effectively has nowhere else to go.His wages alone preclude any interest from another Club.Factor in a transfer fee and uninspiring form and Arsenal are alone in a desire to have him.Wenger can't bear the thought of a player who originally cost over 40 million pounds having no sell - on value.However this is a fact.Extend Ozil's contract for another wasteful two years paying him a wage he doesn't deserve and he'll be off to Turkey once he feels that he's banked enough # 300k weekly wage packets.Any way you look at it Arsenal won't get their money's worth!As unappetising as it might be Arsenal should play «hard - ball» and just let him see out the remainder of his contract.

The 10 - vote limit was a hindrance for many, to the point the BBWAA voted to increase it to 12 in the future, but the average voter used just 8.4 spots on their ballot: there are still a whole lot of voters out there who don't see an obvious backlog even as it repeatedly hits them over the head.

much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..

TBH I fear for the future of Arsenal We have a weak minded manager who can not see the obvious and hasn't done for years e.g Diaby / no DM / Suarez I could go on or his lies I will only but players who are better then he can't find them Weak minded players who don't want to play for the manager And a board that only care about money,

He looks like a guy who can lift a dressing room and whilst we can all lament the terrible away form and poor defence we've had all season, it's hard not to see somebody like that coming in and being a little more jovial as a good thing, so I'm hopeful that he and Mkhi's arrival can have more than the obvious impact on the pitch.

Some incidents are so obvious that they seem incontrovertible, but without doubt, if you took a vote in a room full of a hundred neutral fans, there would still be some who would see it different.

Its been obvious to most that this squad of players has not been right since the end of that 1st great season under Bilic orchestrated on the pitch by Payet.This was followed by a disastrous Summer window when we bought bulk instead of quality, top that off with the Payet wanting to leave fiasco and we have never been the same since.Odd good displays which flattered to deceive but in general a gradual and consistent decline to the bottom.Moyes has inherited this group and i can honestly not see how it will change until January in the transfer market.He will not get a bumper warchest to improve thats for sure and who would want to buy some of these under achievers to create money for new buys.Its a mess and has been since that awful Summer transfer window plus on top of which far too many of this lot have under achieved drastically be it new players we have bought or the OLD boys.Its an ageing side especially at the back and needs a serious overhaul.