Sentences with phrase «who sees mine comments»

Anyone else who sees this comment is free to chime in!
Everyone who sees him comments on the size of his paws — he's gonna be a big boy I think.
I'm mostly wrote it on the off - chance somebody who sees this comment has some insight into the matter.
I've gotten many referrals from people who see my comments to other clients.
There are a few beautiful ones out there, and everyone who sees mine comments on how pretty it is.

Not exact matches

In a tightly scripted campaign launch in which there were few surprises, the comments were unexpected, at least by progressives, who saw them as an early sign she may shift away from the centrist economic policies pursued by her husband, former President Bill Clinton.
«Time spreads and refinery margins have seen significant moves of late,» said a hedge fund industry source who could not comment on the record.
During your broadcast, you'll see the number of viewers, the names of friends who are tuning in and a real - time stream of comments.
«Appreciation Day» saw block - long queues of patrons eager to show their support, while those who opposed the comments retaliated with «kiss - ins.»
This week, Uber temporarily lost its CEO, saw a board member leave after making a sexist comment, and was sued by a rape victim who alleges the company improperly gained access to her medical records.
A portfolio manager at a top 20 BASF shareholder, who declined to be named as they are not authorized to comment publicly on the investment, also saw the merits of a break - up.
This post is in response to the following excellent comment from Stephen Moore, the man who will trounce Ralph Goodale in the next federal election (or at least do better than I did): April 2007 testimony before the parliamentary committee on International Trade saw Industry Canada, DFAIT reps and others stress the importance of the -LSB-...]
Commenting on their investment, David Rhee, partner, Hillhouse Capital, who heads its international investments and will join CarDekho board, said, «We see tremendous growth opportunities in the online automobile classified market in India.
No one has suggested anything of the sort, unless of course asking people to be aware of their privilege, listening to those who don't have it, and doing what they can to address it in their daily lives (see Mary Anne's comment for a beautiful illustration of how even small gestures make a difference) is something that comes «at personal cost.»
O'Leary's comments are also a sharp contrast to his guest at the «Three Sharks in a Castle,» symposium, Mark Cuban, who sees zero value in owning gold as an investment.
Organic reach, as defined by Facebook is «the number of unique people who saw your post in News Feed or on your Page, including people who saw it from a story shared by a friend when they liked, commented on or shared your post, answered a question or responded to an event.»
All they do is redistribute money from those who do — see comment on taxing the rich above).
Unfortunately this comment section has evolved (see I'm using «evolutionary terms») into a debate on whether or not God exists and if religion is true or false, and what religions are right, and who's wrong.
Your comment kind of puts all believers in the same basket, and while I agree that there are some who say they do but don't I would submit to you, that if this has been what you've seen you have really not seen the whole story at all.
To those who look at the world and say «see how old it is, therefore God does not exist because the bible states that it is only 6 - 10 thousand years old» you may never get this comment.
Griz, Yes, Griz, there is a head case who is using my posting name of CatholicMom and has done it on other sites also; he thinks he is hurting me but it is not just Catholics who are on here, too; but once everyone knows he is doing this, it is real easy to see «who is who» and you can skip over his comments... no problem.
I haven't seen this film, and so can not comment on it - but to all who lump atheists with communists, nazis, hedonists, and every other debased human quality, you are wrong.
All the religious comments accuse the atheists of being fools who can't see the signs in nature and will burn in hell.
You seem like a good person, and seem to do a much better job of conducting yourself as a Christian should than many Christians who post online, but I see no signs in your comment of independent thought.
Those who have a brain and think for themselves see that is is bunk (see the «invisible pink unicorn» comments), leaving those of us who still believe in a higher power and seek spiritual understanding on an island.
The founder of Oasis has a track record of making statements which rile many of those who self - identify as evangelicals (see Chalke's past comments on the atonement, the Bible and homosexuality).
I read the comments and saw that those who would see your cartoons as nasty grafetti are still around — I guess they did not go over to your other site.
I» m a complete outsider in another part of the world who did see glimpses of this very ugly story 4 years ago in some blogposts and comments including Bill Kinnons «Here's a thought» blog.
But as Morna Hooker has commented, the transfiguration account can best be understood as a «christophany,» a moment when we see «who Jesus Christ really is.»
Seeing that Julie has made it clear in multiple comments here that she is entirely willing to open the books for anyone who cares to challenge her version of events, we're left with only one conclusion.
I am reading your newest posts to your oldest.I have never been to bible school but I consider myself in the journey of education concerning the bible.more than any opinions that you have what concerns me most is how «brothers and sisters» through their comments responds to someone who thinks differently from what is perceived as absolutes (not sure if that's the right term) in scripture.I wonder did the apostle believe half the things that are seen as church doctirine today?how did the disciples who did not have the new testament or the ability to read follow Jesus?I appreciate your questioning.In my experience we are too quick to try and fix someone or use the scriptures as a control mechanism and to slow to practise empathy and love..
From the comments I have read I am beginning to see why there are Christians who just proclaim non-believers are going to hell rather than trying to be tolerable and understanding.
I didn't say I hated anyone and if you could bother to actually read and live in reality you'd see my comments weren't directed at Christians, just at about one third of Christians who are extremists.
Very true, glad to see an atheist who doesn't just leave hateful and snarky comments regarding religion.
I usually comment on Jeremy's posts, but when I saw the direction those comments were going, I refrained lest I say some unkind things to some of those who were unkind, unloving and so certain they were right and others were wrong.
All you have to do is read social media comments, listen to radio and tv personalities, etc., to see that we STILL have too many people who are racists (and are not afraid to admit it).
On thing I would like to see on subjects like this is for those who comment start with their religious beliefs.
I see people who write really stupid comments but it's as easy to learn about as googling the word.
By nature, the present President of America has that element in him — I should not be saying this but I am being inherently made to convey this as comment of exception for America and for Obama whose whole (Obama and his better half) stand as an extension through the ex Presidential candidate's Charisma Of the Secretary Hillary Clinton that President Obama's Charisma has selflessly absorbed for function in the cabinet gracefully for America and the world.That shows the humbleness of President Obama and maturity of Hillary Clinton of acceptance without a feeling of high and low of ego regarded as exceptional in Divinity.I was not supposed to make this comment and I have done so to urge the Republicans to accept their Light within of consensus through individual projections under control as Obama's gesture of bipartisanship that will come to address.In short, this comment is all about health and health care where economics alone does not come into the picture with a rigorous analysis on it but should also extend as leverage to the person in play (Obama) who is also selflessly poised with corrections on it over the infra structure of it that he has proposed for approval as ego of his working element as the executive public ally chosen as the President that had appealed to the public at large voting even putting behind able dleaers like McCain?George W Bush was the last to steer America into the Light over the past of America and that stands as the subtle truth even today as on date with Bill Clinton the ex President of America giving support through his excellent independent caliber for Obama ultimately to head the show of America that was time bound of its reality that sees no barriers and to which he accepted well in his individual capacity as the free lance ex President of America.
It's funny How those who don't agree with Tebow's praying and so Forth, yet I've yet to see anything in all these comments About the Black lives matter gang who are disrupting the NFL.
But people who promote gay marriage are not interested in understanding my perspective (see the comments on the previous 45 pages!).
I am tempted to pop in and see, in a month or two, just how many of the «countless people who don't dare comment on this blog but would love to because of the mean reaction they KNOW they will receive from» Sam and I, will be blogging.
I saw that threat against Daisy Khan this morning on ABC, it came from from an fundamentalist Islamic Imam in Europe who was upset that she was not wearing tradition womans garb and gasp... her face was exposed (no comment).
You see one of my girls is a brilliant autistic and the other is a satiric genius who is a quick with a comment as Zorro was with a blade.
Sad to read the comments here and see how few are written by people who know what they are talking about.
See... that's why my first reaction is that comments like that are intended to provoke others who care about living by faith in Christ.
[33] See the comments and analysis offered by Dagmar Heller who frankly assesses positions and interrelationships between the Baptists, the Orthodox and the Catholics, among others, and points out that» [o] ne may get the impression that the situation today is in fact more complicated than it was before BEM.
I have read a lot of the comments here and I see some of you pass judgement on people who say it.
Apart from Cobb, who sees in that passage evidence that God is subordinated to creativity, the aforementioned scholars limit themselves to general comments, mostly on the notion of the «Ultimate.»
I never said you had to adopt my interpretation of the truth, I merely said someone who holds to Barth's view of interpretation relinquishes his / her right to critique someone else's interpretation (See naked pastor's comments on Barth on Nov. 26).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z