There's only one person
who sees things from your point of view and that's what we as readers, want.
Not exact matches
When
things get hard, having a manager
who can get along and
see things from everyone's
point of view will create a feeling
of inclusion.
i agre with Dave and then some - christians (and other folks
who are serious in their beliefs too) are comical, believing and praying to someone
who can't be
seen, can't be proven... (this is
from the
point of view of an empiricist,
who is able to measure
things) Christians (well, me for sure) are hypocrits - believing in fantastic ideals and guaranteed to continualy fall short - that is a fairly comical notion, but nonetheless, one I enjoy to continue to strive for - setting high ideals and striving towards them.
On top
of this, those
who embrace «certainty - seeking faith» tend to become narrow - minded, for honestly trying to
see things from other peoples»
point of view might lead them to question their faith and thereby jeopardize their «salvation.
From my own experience, I can tell that it is invaluable to get feedback from an «outsider» who sees things from a different point of v
From my own experience, I can tell that it is invaluable to get feedback
from an «outsider» who sees things from a different point of v
from an «outsider»
who sees things from a different point of v
from a different
point of view.
In fact, if you're dating someone
who has different passions and perspectives than you do, you may find that you truly enjoy engaging in these new and exciting activities and
seeing things from a new
point of view.
Playing a successful businesswoman
who does not subscribe to social stereotypes, Sridevi's character starts off as a woman
who does not listen to reason but eventually starts
seeing things from different
points of view.
They're the one major player
who's yet to come around to ePub, and for what it's worth — I think that it's going to take a bit
of time, some elbow grease, and a lot
of arm wrestling to get them to
see things from the publisher's
point of view.
Michael Andrews,
who died in 1995, was a poetic realist
who saw things from unexpected and eerie
points of view.
From my limited
point of view, the dichotomy you mention is the difference between those people
who see things «the way that
things are» and those people
who see «the way that
things ought to be».
To
point out just a couple
of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I
see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know
who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend
from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it
from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to
point out, HadCRU and MSU
of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three
things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade
of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no
point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part
of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full
view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead
of GW, maybe even that a small part
of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
While moving the device around and letting the app and phone sensors do all the work might be more fun and seem more immersive, those
who aren't keen on spinning around to
see every side
of a 360 - degree video can simply use the built - in touch navigation to pan the video to another side, this way they can stay put and still enjoy
seeing things from different
points of view.
Think about this disagreement with your partner
from the perspective
of a neutral third party
who wants the best for all involved; a person
who sees things from a neutral
point of view.
You still send the card because the worst
thing from the
point of view of the people I interviewed, it's the parent
who stopped sending the card and stopped reaching out, and then they're alienating parent turns around and the kid and says, «
See?