Sentences with phrase «who suggested he read»

He saw a doctor today for that problem who suggested he read your book and for him to lose 15 pounds.
People who suggest reading ebooks on a computer or netbook miss the point of the Kindle.

Not exact matches

Gates showers praise on this exploration of poverty and housing insecurity in America, suggesting that the book is worth reading for every American who hasn't personally experienced the threat of eviction and homelessness.
«Find a way to read around your schedule and your life situation,» says Foroux, who suggests you could read on the train, while waiting at the doctor's office, while breastfeeding your baby (I can personally testify you can get through quite a lot of books this way), or during breaks at work.
Read, suggest a bunch of folks who have recently been in your shoes.
Third, and we say this only half in jest, anyone who suggests that a money - center bank, European or otherwise, is not a government - sponsored enterprise hasn't been reading the papers lately.
Older adults who volunteered to help children with reading and writing tended to experience less memory loss and maintain greater physical mobility, one study suggested.
I would suggest anyone who is curious to read the white papers and decide for themselves.
On a final note, if you are a B2B marketer who is helping customers progress through a complex buying cycle, Ardath Albee has a must - read post on editorial calendars, where she suggests that you track additional details such as the following:
By reading the Ninth Amendment as creating a general right to privacy, Black and Stewart suggested, the unelected justices of the Supreme Court had subst - ituted their own subjective notions of justice, liberty, and reasonableness for the wisdom and experience of the elected representatives in the Connecticut state legislature who were responsible for passing the birth control regulation.
Meanwhile, to Hawking's supporters who suggest that I am not owning up to his scientific «proofs,» I believe airwx has already said it best for me — he's a THEORETICAL physicist, and having read some of his work, I'm smart enough to know that much of what he says about God is an exercise in jumping to conclusions, even as sound as much of his scientific work is.
It depends on how many names you send us of family members, friends, and associates who should be reading FT.. We'll send them a letter giving you credit for suggesting that we get in touch.
Of course I wouldn't write «by Joe», but if this writing was to first be heard by a group instead of read (as some scholars have suggested), I might try to bring my audience to attention right off the bat with a mention of the one who just passed who was an important founder of the organization I'm addressing: «Joe, blah blah blah...»
But when David Halberstam (who, with Neil Sheehan, did more than anyone else to create the canonical narrative of Vietnam) died tragically this past year in an auto accident, not a single obituary notice I read suggested he had been terribly wrong about Tet or that his wrongheadedness had helped create a political situation that had had lethal consequences for millions.
It seems you are suggesting we can know who Jesus is and know his character without hearing about him from someone or reading the Bible.
Borg is a liberal and I'd suggest to read a book which looks like a debate with the famous British theologian: N.T. Wright «who is Jesus» or something like that.
I would not say that those who can not read or do not read are lost human beings as you suggest.
Obviously, that's subjective — and Christians who follow it would certainly disagree — but suggesting that people don't read it seems misguided considering how influential it remains.
A friend who taught Church history suggested I read George Herbert's book The Country Parson and the Temple (Paulist Press).
Kierkegaard's own brief preface to Purity of Heart Is to Will One Thing does little more than begin this process, and tempts me to suggest that one who is not familiar with other works of Kierkegaard, will find himself still better prepared for immersion in this address if he turns immediately to Section Twelve and reads from that point to the end.
As to who I should hang out with, again had you read my previous posts you would know that I have done, and continue to do as you suggest.
If you read closely, you'll see that I suggested an «un-caused cause» is the typical solution offered by theists who, after inferring the necessity of causation for all events, must then answer the question of what caused their proffered «cause.»
Are you suggesting we read it to reach the believers who have left the church?
But for Christians who think this consitutes «persecution», I might suggest you read more about the lives and deaths of the saints of old, or the plight of Christians in China and many countries even today.
But to those who dismiss the existence of god I suggest you read The Declaration of Independence.
As part of this late exercise in autodidactism, they suggested that I read various books — some of which were subsequently acquired — by formidable chess grandmasters including Nimzowitsch and Alekhine and others who left permanent stamps on the game.
For students who are afraid of God, who have emphasized God's righteousness and their sinfulness, God's bigness and their wormlikeness, I suggest that they find something that doesn't occupy their minds but is pleasant to do, like handiwork, or doing a crossword puzzle, or even reading a detective novel, and to just sit in God's presence.
Dr. Podles also suggests I am a picky academic who exaggerated an insignificant and correctable mistake about whether Bernard of Clairvaux read Origen in the Greek.
Perhaps Mark is interested in suggesting to whatever Roman officials who might read his gospel that the Roman power was relatively guiltless in the affair.
Anyway, if anyone who is reading this can ever imagine the second Joshua, Jesus, doing anything like this to «sinners» who are brought before Him for judgment, let me suggest that you know nothing about Jesus.
If you are truthful with yourself and want to settle this «thing» about God... read Romans and then I would suggest the Gospel of John... I can truthfully say (and I once thought as you and many others who post on these «religious» blogs)... I am so believing in this Jesus dude that I really can not imagine living my life without Him.
I'll take you at your word regarding your recommendation to study and suggest you read WHAT GOD DOES TO YOUR BRAIN by two neuroscientists, Andrew Newberg who is a «theist» (believes in some kind of divine character) and Mark Waldman and agnostic (a non commit on the question).
Gladwell isn't read best as a discoverer of facts, but as an observer of trends and anomalies who dares to suggest what they might mean.
For those who want to understand better the Allah and God question, I suggest a read of the breakthrough writings of Mark Siljander, author of the book «A Deadly Misunderstanding».
and after listening to my local priest proclaim that he was a Republican during his homilies and after getting a last minute «YOU know who your pastoral conscience suggests you vote for» at the last mass before the election, and after reading all the pronouncements by the us conference of bishops as they were published throughout the election year, I know that THE BISHOPS WERE WAY TOO PARTISAN AND AS A CATHOLIC IT OFFENDS ME THAT THE BISHOPS THINK SO POORLY OF THE POLITICAL JUDGEMENT OF CATHOLICS THAT THEY HAVE TO BE TOLD WHO TO VOTE Fwho your pastoral conscience suggests you vote for» at the last mass before the election, and after reading all the pronouncements by the us conference of bishops as they were published throughout the election year, I know that THE BISHOPS WERE WAY TOO PARTISAN AND AS A CATHOLIC IT OFFENDS ME THAT THE BISHOPS THINK SO POORLY OF THE POLITICAL JUDGEMENT OF CATHOLICS THAT THEY HAVE TO BE TOLD WHO TO VOTE FWHO TO VOTE FOR.
I suggest that the answer to that question, and one that comes to mind immediately for the one who reads the Bible attentively, is simple: Our relationship to the God of the Bible is to listen to God so we can love him more deeply and love others more completely.»
It suggests the stronger interpretation to those who find it congenial, but allows for a more modest reading for anyone who considers such views either presumptuous or preposterous.
We read of Hook, the retired teacher, who quotes his father's hired hand, and Elizabeth Heinemann, whose understanding of heaven suggests that she is perhaps meant to be considered in the long tradition of blind «seers.»
After reading the recipe and the comments below, I would suggest using a mild sausage for the ones who don't care for the heat.
@arsenal207 what does that have to do with anything wether or not fans go to the Emirates, I do but not often, but most of Arsenal supporters around the world don't have the privileged that we have in UK, I have read here in the past Arsenal supporters walking or traveling tens of miles to their nearest cafe to watch arsenal match on TV they walked in the midday sun in places like Central Africa, so are you suggesting they are not true supporters and have no right to comment??? And what of those supporters who pay shi!t loads of cable fees to watch their team, I say they are.
In the case of Chavski, we have an owner who was willing to do what you suggested, Silent Stan blocked Usmanov though I believe I read that Usmanov offered us a 0 % interest loan over a silly length of time (100 years I think) and that meant we would be making repayments of a fraction of what we did make allowing more funds for wages and signing of top quality players.
Now I am going to suggest that if we can't attract a world - class holding midfielder (not talking blood - n - guts destroyer here but more a cultured interceptor, reads the play well, tackles effectively, good passing range, breaks up attacks and recycles the ball quickly into attacking moves — so not Wanyama) to provide cover for the ever - improving Coquelin, we probably shouldn't worry too much because we have Rambo who can step into that role when Coquelin or Santi aren't available (injured / suspended).
Reports I have read suggest that fining a manager like Mourinho, who is a multi millionaire, is pointless as the amount of a fine means very little to a man who feels he is above all of them anyway.
Many comments I've read on social media and in the newspapers this week would suggest that there are a number of people out there who wouldn't necessarily agree with that one.
I was more interested in reading the various online comments regarding Puel's sacking which were polarised between Saint's supporters, bemoaning the style of football / lack of entertainment served up under his stewardship and, what I took be mostly patronising comments from neutrals (i.e. armchair supporters of big clubs), who suggested that Southampton should simply be thankful for an eighth place finish and were mad to sack him.
Actually i never flying in airplanes with baby so i don't have any experience to use this but after read your post i suggest parents who regularly travel in airplanes.
When discussing allergens with a mom, who is also a homeopath, she mentioned she has read some articles that suggest there is a link between peanut allergies being on the rise and a peanut protein being used in vaccines.
I'd highly suggest you read Kara's post: http://allthingsd.com/20130224/old-media-doesnt-get-new-media-chapter-203-the-sheryl-sandberg-attack/ Why don't we start celebrating women who are successful career-wise and as parents?
So many people who have not read his book believe that he suggests putting a baby down and letting them exhaust themselves crying till they fall asleep not so.
For the mom with the 12 - month - old who won't sleep, you've probably already decided on something to do but I just wanted to suggest reading «secrets of the baby whisperer for toddlers».
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z