Sentences with phrase «who support the claim»

In his swift reaction on Thurday, Fayemi, who supported his claim with the copy of a letter already sent to the House of Representatives on Wednesday said it was surprising.

Those with political reasons who support the claim human CO2 is destroying the planet are particularly vocal.

Not exact matches

In a bruising five - hour session, the FBI director also knocked down Trump's claim that his predecessor had wiretapped his New York skyscraper, an assertion that has distracted White House officials and frustrated fellow Republicans who acknowledge they've seen no evidence to support it.

U.S. Supreme Court justices expressed support on Tuesday for Microsoft's bid to fend off class action claims by Xbox 360 owners who say the video game console gouges discs because of a design defect.

The Ex-Im Bank, which provides credit insurance for businesses who extend terms to overseas customers, has been a political football of late, with conservative politicians claiming the bank overwhelmingly supports big businesses over small ones.

Canadians who support a parent or grandparent who is 65 years of age or older, and living with them, can no longer make a claim.

The tech giant is planning to bring «digital pen» support to iPhones starting in 2019, Korean news outlet The Investor is reporting, citing people who claim to have knowledge of the company's plans.

In fact, just 9 percent of students studying business claim they received such support, which is half the rate of kids who took up the arts and humanities.

The whole thing can be a huge pain in the ass, and for multinationals who do not keep very good records of their China operations, they might simply be unable to support their claim.

(Pecker claims that the National Enquirer's readers are «white working people» who support Trump.)

Officials from Canada and the United Kingdom testified in support of Bombardier's case, including David MacNaughton, Canada's ambassador to the United States, who disputed Boeing's claim of unfair subsidies and argued that Boeing itself was heavily subsidized.

He told the audience that if they want to do something to help journalists, they should support blog TechDirt and its founder Mike Masnick, who is being sued by the same lawyer who led Hogan's lawsuit against Gawker over stories TechDirt published about Shiva Ayyadurai, who claims to have invented email.

Opponents of Bill C - 51 claimed that new spy laws passed by the former Conservative government with support from the Liberals could target Canadian citizens who oppose the expansion of oil pipelines.

The Bible does not support fundamentalists and creationists who claim that the creative days were literal 24 - hour days The Bible does not support fundamentalists and creationists who claim that the creative days were literal 24 - hour days.

And I would much rather have someone in office who is not a biblical Christian but holds biblical values than a man who claims to be a Christian but who supports the values of the devil (i.e., Obama).

Consider that a «cop out» if you will, but the evidence to support my assertion is abundant and it is not I who am making extraordinary claims here.

Even persons who claimed to feel satisfied with their work and to enjoy the support of their congregations seem to wrestle with low self - esteem.

Some were from people who clearly had no significant training in mathematics who claimed the article was wrong and proceed to offer proofs to support their claims.

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

- how you can claim God's love for kids with special needs while supporting a man who openly mocks people with disabilities,

So Grudem claims that any selectivity whatsoever represents an arbitrary «pick - and - choose» approach to Scripture and a threat to biblical authority, and that those who support functional gender equality in the home and church are simply bending the «plain meaning of Scripture.»

If you try to reconcile this enormous diversity in religions with the claim there is one true god who has always existed you need to come up with theories and rationalizations we both know you can't support with any evidence.

MyMainMan, one other point I'd like to make: If you're going to support Sagan's claim that athiests must presume to have much more knowledge than the rest of us, then the exact same must apply to Theists (those who believe in God).

There also comes into play both sides who taint and change the evidence to support their outlandish claims.

In fact it's more disgusting if someone claims to represent God and then molests or child, protects those who do, or contines to support the organization which hides this type of behavior.

Your hate of it and of those who support it undermines your «claims» and underscores your own issues.

If I get an email from a Nigerian prince who tells me I can receive $ 1M if I send him $ 10K, and there's no evidence to support this claim, I'm going to move the email to the «trash bin».

But we need to remember that homosexual practice and orientation are conflated by the government so that not supporting a homosexual lifestyle is not to support the person who claims to be homosexual.

It now seems that those who were claiming the Pope's support for such changes were probably trying to manipulate him.

Clergy who supported such an abhorrent idea claimed the authority of the Bible.

I see scholarly work that supports Jesus» death at this very age, and I have a friend who claims to have inside information to confirm this date.

It is a Jesus who does not well support Christianity's triumphalist claim and a Jesus who keeps nudging a major shift, from a Christocentric theology to a theocentric Christology.

Atheists who claim to be experts only use parts of the bible that will support their agenda (god is evil and murderous) but won't tell the entire story.

I spoke with a man 2 weeks ago who claimed that the earth is 6500 years old, that dinosaurs are a fraud, and that there is no evidence to support evolution.

So for them to think a blogger who has allowed discussion on the issues surrounding Tony as a public figure who used his privilege to control — is going to take it down blog posts simply because those who support the NPD or the NPD himself claims the «court» says so, must think we all fell off the turnip truck.

Swaggart's claim was supported by mainstream religious groups who understand that the rights of the majority depend upon our protecting the rights of the minority, and even the marginal.

As a more or less libertarian, I'm used to having tom explain economics 101 stuff to liberals, but lately it seems it's the conservatives who least understand the markets they claim to support.

The practice claims support from Paul, who explicitly bans its prohibition (I Cor.

I hate people who claim to support small government, but who at the same time try to legislate morality.

Furthermore, for someone who claims to support «biblical manhood» and «biblical womanhood,» Wilson's argument has no support from scripture whatsoever.

I strongly support women at all levels of leadership in the church, and am suspicious of anyone who would claim that the Bible presents just one «right way» to be woman.

It has been a deep embarrassment to watch some Catholics brutally twist their minds and consciences into the service of defending their claim that faithful and staunchly anti-abortion Catholics should support a radically pro-abortion presidential candidate who says his first act in office will be to sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which would, by federal mandate, eliminate even the most minimal legal discouragements of the killing of unborn...

It has been a deep embarrassment to watch some Catholics brutally twist their minds and consciences into the service of defending their claim that faithful and staunchly anti-abortion Catholics should support a radically pro-abortion presidential candidate who says his first act in office will be to sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which would, by federal mandate, eliminate even the most minimal legal discouragements of the killing of unborn babies.

After Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a bill that outlaws «hom.ose.xual propaganda» in the country, Lively expressed pleasure and support for such a bill, and claimed in a September 2013 interview with NBC that he influenced Russian lawmakers who implemented it.

People who claim the «Conservative» label rarely agree on everything, in many cases they differ radically, William F. Buckley, for example, supported legalization of marijuana and cocaine, which other people who think themselves conservatives call the height of liberalism.

Those who hold that Mohammed had already arranged the chapters essentially as they now exist cite passages from the Traditions to support their claims.

Von Campenhausen believes that if the story were simply a legend «it would not have specified three women (who, by Jewish law, were not competent to testify) as the decisive witnesses ’25 and he is supported at this point by H. H. Rex who claimed that «This is in itself a point in favor of the authenticity of the tradition.

He «did not claim to be a theologian, but he was determined to support the work of those who might deepen our «knowledge and love of God».»

Hitchens claims that people who «speak darkly of borders as unnecessary and undesirable» also «live remotely from the areas most directly affected by the large - scale migration they say they support,» but I have lived my entire adult life in three cities that have been host to successive waves of migration: Chicago, New York, and Washington, D.C..

But the struggle for your reputation is not over yet, and the problem is not just your religious opponents but those who falsely claim you in support of their own interests.