Not exact matches
The legal background is complicated, but the gist of it is that Gawker would likely win the
case — but for the fact the
trial is
taking place in Hogan's hometown, and in front of jurors
who are unlikely
to look kindly on New York - based Gawker and its Oxford - educated founder, Nick Denton.
Such crime if it
took place any where in our Islamic lands and was caught for the crime... he will be torn
to pieces there and then with out
trial since
trials are supposed for those
who are suspected and not proven guilty... but as a
case that is as plain they should have condemned him
to worst death with out any need for court
trials... But by being soft on the issue and giving ear
to such junk you open doors for those copycats whom seek fame... That is only fair and secure..
«The criminal assault
trial of Kevin S. Parker, a state senator from central Brooklyn, was thrown into turmoil on Thursday, as a judge granted the Brooklyn district attorney's office's request
to have two special prosecutors appointed — one
who would
take over the
case, and another
who would investigate possible improprieties by an assistant district attorney.
Updated 3:26 p.m. The criminal assault
trial of Kevin S. Parker, a state senator from central Brooklyn, was thrown into turmoil on Thursday, as a judge granted the Brooklyn district attorney's office's request
to have two special prosecutors appointed — one
who would
take over the
case, and another
who would investigate possible improprieties by an assistant district attorney not directly involved in the proceeding.
Kenneth E. Riddett,
who was legislative counsel
to the Senate majority for many years,
took the stand Tuesday at Bruno's federal
trial on corruption charges and spent hours answering questions about the lawmaker's financial disclosure forms that are at the heart of the government's
case.
More important is Hutton's overstatement of the
case for HRT: the long - term benefits of HRT are still not clear because the women
who began
taking HRT twenty or thirty years ago were probably healthier
to begin with, and no one has set up a long - term randomised controlled
trial.
The challenge
takes on even more urgency with recent developments, including a federal administration now more open
to exploring the potential of stem cells, the recent FDA approval of a human
trial involving embryonic stem cells, as well as the reported
case of a young boy
who developed a brain tumor four years after receiving a stem - cell treatment for a rare genetic disorder.
Ben Gazzara (
who passed away earlier this year) is the defendant, a hot - headed army officer arrested for murder, and Lee Remick, Arthur O'Connell and Eve Arden co-star, with rising star George C. Scott getting a «featuring» credit for a small role and a brilliant performance as a big - city attorney
who steps in
to take over the state's
case late in the
trial.
As I dug deeper I was struck by the sense of outrage and loss this painting aroused in so many people: The family of Lea Bondi, determined
to reclaim the stolen portrait she had failed
to recover in her lifetime; the Manhattan District Attorney
who sent shock waves through the international art world and enraged many of New York's most prominent cultural organizations when he issued a subpoena and launched a criminal investigation following the surprise resurfacing of Portrait of Wally; the New York art dealer
who tipped off a reporter about the painting during the opening of the Schiele exhibition at MoMA; the Senior Special Agent at the Department of Homeland Security
who vowed not
to retire until the fight was over; the art theft investigator
who unearthed the post-war subterfuge and confusion that ultimately landed the painting in the hands of a young, obsessed Schiele collector; the museum official
who testified before Congress that the seizure of Portrait of Wally could have a crippling effect on the ability of American museums
to borrow works of art; the Assistant United States Attorney
who took the
case to the eve of
trial; and the legendary Schiele collector
who bartered for Portrait of Wally in the early 1950s and fought
to the end of his life
to bring it home
to Vienna.
An accused
who was previously eligible for a lenient sentence or
who had racked up considerable pre-sentence custody could throw in the towel and make peace with Her Majesty but is now encouraged
to take a shot at
trial even where he assesses his own chances of winning the
case as poor — if you're getting slammed by a mandatory minimum whether you plead guilty or not, you may as well spin the wheel of justice and see what happens.
Engaging early on in the process, we
take a uniquely holistic approach
to each
case, uncovering angles and strategic opportunities often missed by those
who lack our
trial experience.
Most of the time, a defendant
who rejects a plea and
takes the
case to trial wants an acquittal.
That decision, released last year, was R v. Jordan, which
takes its name from Gottardi's client, Barrett Jordan, a Surrey, B.C., man
who was arrested on drug charges and whose
case took four years
to get
to trial.
Already, dozens of
cases in Ontario alone have been stayed under the Jordan framework, with the public becoming particularly familiar with the name when an Ottawa judge threw out a first - degree murder charge against ex-soldier Adam Picard,
who was accused of killing 28 - year - old Fouad Nayel, after it
took four years
to bring his
case to trial.
Not just experience handling personal injury
cases per se, but experience in the courtroom, and
who's actually
taking cases to trial, has put a
case similar
to the one that you or your loved one has, and has actually tried that
to the verdict.
Learn about the statute of limitations,
who will handle your
case in addition
to this lawyer, how long it will
take to resolve, whether your
case is likely
to go
to trial, and how often and in what form the lawyer will communicate with you.
For your car accident in Boston, consult Neil Burns, a proven litigator with over 25 years of accident claim experience
who is prepared
to take your
case to trial if necessary or
who can negotiate a reasonable and satisfactory settlement for your accident claim.
In this video, mesothelioma attorney Richard Dodd talks about the importance of seeking representation from a
trial lawyer
who is not afraid
to take your
case to court.
It was during this period that Mr. Bilecki was mentored by legendary criminal
trial lawyer Joel Hirschhorn,
who taught him the fundamentals of
taking big
cases to trial and winning.
Many states have established what is known as «drug court» programs charged with serious drug offences under the supervision of a judge
who aim
to rehabilitate the accused (usually are repeat offenders) instead of
taking the
case to trial.
You need an experienced personal injury attorney
who will
take the time
to carefully analyze your
case, obtain critical evidence, speak with potential witnesses and prepare your
case for
trial.
When selecting a car accident lawyer for your
case in Idaho be sure
to find a highly rated attorney
who is willing
to take your
case to trial if necessary.
Patrick is an experienced litigator and
trial lawyer
who has regularly
taken cases through
to trial and arbitral hearings, with extensive experience in complex commercial litigation (including international arbitration and other cross-border disputes), as well as trademark and patent disputes, trade secret theft, and regulatory investigations in a broad range of industries.
When it comes
to representing you and your family's best interests, it is important
to find someone
who is experienced in every step of handling personal injury
cases, from investigation
to filing a claim
to mediation and if necessary,
taking a
case to trial.
When this happens, it's imperative
to have an experienced personal injury lawyer that is experienced with complex litigation, one
who is organized, knowledgeable and is willing
to take your
case to trial from the very start.
In order
to recover fair compensation for our clients
who have suffered a personal injury, we believe that the insurance companies need
to know that the lawyer representing the injured party is someone
who is willing
to take a
case through
trial.
While it is a fact that a vast majority of personal injury
cases are settled outside a courtroom, you may still need a lawyer with
trial experience — one
who is not afraid
to take your
case to trial should the need arise.
We will aggressively negotiate for the compensation you deserve for your injuries, and, if necessary, we have experienced
trial attorneys
who can
take your
case all the way
to court.
We are also
trial - tested attorneys
who will not hesitate
to take your
case to court if that serves your best interests.
You want a lawyer
who will help you settle your
case, but if the other side will not settle, you also want a lawyer
who is willing and experienced
to take your
case to trial.
If the
case goes
to trial, that decision is
taken out of the victim's hands and the jury will decide
who is liable for the damages.
So whatever turn your
case takes make sure you have a KC traffic accident lawyer
who is highly experienced in
taking cases through settlement and
to trial.
The panel addressed how
trial lawyers
who focus on winning a
case can
take advantage of appellate lawyers» expertise
to ensure the
case is not later lost on appeal.
Not just experience handling personal injury
cases per se, but experience in the courtroom, and
who's actually
taking cases to trial, has put a
case similar
to the one that you or your loved one has, -LSB-...]
I am a highly experienced criminal defense attorney
who is dedicated
to protecting my clients» rights and finding resolutions
to your problem through plea negotiation or
taking your
case to trial.
These types of accidents can be devastating, and you will need an attorney
who is experienced in high - stakes negotiations with insurers, as well as
taking complex injury
cases to trial.
We can negotiate with insurers
who play hardball and
take your
case to trial if necessary.
Although the additional time that the federal judges
took to make decisions is not dispositive of the result, it adds
to the possibility that state judges viewing the heavy burden on summary judgment were and are less willing
to grant these motions as a threshold matter and instead prefer
to let
cases proceed
to trial or settlement.112 By contrast, the federal judges
who take more time in coming
to decisions may put more weight on the summary judgment motions if they are, on the balance, more willing
to grant them.
When you are represented by us, you have an accident claim lawyer
who is knows how
to skillfully negotiate a settlement or
take a
case to trial if necessary.
And prosecutors may be more willing
to negotiate with an attorney
who is known for fighting for their clients and
taking cases to trial when necessary.
One major downside of
taking a matter
to trial is that you leave the outcome of your
case in the hands of someone
who does not know you and you lose control of the outcome.
Since 1977, Clark & Trevithick's litigation department has earned a reputation of having
trial lawyers
who do not shy away from
taking cases to trial if all reasonable settlement efforts have been exhausted.
He is a civil litigator
who understands that every
case is important, regardless of size, and although most
cases settle, he has the
trial experience and track record
to take cases to trial, if necessary.
However, if the parties don't reach a settlement, you need
to have an attorney
who is able and willing
to take your
case to trial and has a proven track record of success in court.
To a lesser degree, you have the same problem when you hire a personal injury attorney who has no history of taking to trial and winning cases against the insurance compan
To a lesser degree, you have the same problem when you hire a personal injury attorney
who has no history of
taking to trial and winning cases against the insurance compan
to trial and winning
cases against the insurance company.
When you hire a lawyer
who is willing
to take a
case to trial, value is added
to your
case in a number of ways.
This requires a lawyer
who specializes in personal injury and has the courage
to take the
case to trial when needed.
For those
who did not see it, I thought it would be helpful
to put into this blog Justice Brown's observation, reported in the Globe in early July 2013, that «the root of the problem is a belief that «
trials are bad» and «mediation will solve all problems,» which
took hold in recent decades and sapped the will
to move
cases swiftly
to trial».
Many
trials used volunteers or people selected by referrers as willing
to take part in parenting projects, thus excluding many disorganised, unmotivated, or disadvantaged families,
who have the most antisocial children.2 A review of meta - analyses of published
trials of psychological treatments for childhood disorders found that in university settings the effect size was large, from 0.71
to 0.84 SD.12 In contrast, a review of six studies of outcome in regular service clinics since 1950 showed no significant effects, 12 and a large
trial offering unrestricted access
to outpatient services found no improvement.13 Reasons suggested for the poor outcome in clinic
cases include that they have more severe problems, come from more distressed families, and receive less empirically supported interventions from staff with heavier caseloads.