Sentences with phrase «who talks about climate change»

As someone who talks about climate change a lot, I can vouch for this.

ClimateBites offers metaphors, soundbites, quotes, humor, cartoons, stories and graphics for everybody who talks about climate change and wants their message to stick.

Not exact matches

Overnight a row broke out about the non-participation of the Lib Dems» energy secretary Chris Huhne, who is attending climate change talks in Cancun.

But perhaps it holds a lesson for anyone who is concerned about climate change and doesn't know how to talk to friends and family who aren't.

In this episode, University of Wisconsin - Madison public health expert Jonathan Patz talks about the ethical issues raised by climate change — who's causing it and who suffers most from it.

«We recommend for the folks that are talking with farmers one on one, it's probably a more effective communication strategy to talk about more extreme weather rather than saying, «Let's take care of anthropogenic climate change,»» said J. Gordon Arbuckle, a sociology professor with Iowa State University who helps conduct the survey.

Davies wanted to find out who knew about these Climategate emails, which had been timed to coincide with climate change talks in Copenhagen, Denmark, in 2009.

Their talks underscored that the people who worry about vaccinating their children are not necessarily doubters of climate change or even against GMOs.

Any chance the authors can provide a larger version of their figure, properly referenced, that could be used in digital presentations by those of us who talk to the public about climate change?

Frank Shu, who has done pioneering research in astronomy on planetary disks, the origin of meteorites and the evolution of stars, will talk about reversing climate change.

Our findings suggest that there is a climate change «spiral of silence,» in which even people who care about the issue, shy away from discussing it because they so infrequently hear other people talking about it — reinforcing the spiral.

When I talk to people about climate change (and the one time that I gave a talk on climate change at a physics colloquium), I always like to emphasize the fact that I am a PhD physicist who has spent considerable time reading up on the issue, including many of the actual papers in the peer - reviewed journals, but even with that background I still am not arrogant enough to believe that this qualifies me to have a truly independent opinion on the subject.

I'm pretty sure this is the scientist I heard on local KQED radio today, who started to talk about climate change — he got as far as saying he'd been teaching his students about climate change including this for years, and the fire problem is going to get much worse — and then the radio host cut him off.

By continually hammering on climate change or global warming — a challenge for sure, but abstract and not immediate to most people's experience — we've disconnected from most people who have more immediate concerns; we've virtually stopped talking about the impacts of air and water pollution on their children's health, the psychological damage all of us experience when nature around us is destroyed, and so on.

Thanks to excellent guidance from Audubon experts who briefed me on the impacts of climate change on birds and their habitats — I felt confident I could talk about these things, at least in brief.

Our work finds that this awkwardness is especially marked among young people, who told us that climate change is «uncool,» «sounds preachy» and is «not something I feel comfortable talking about - like religion.»

Disagreeing that politics is dominated by a green consensus is the Independent «s Andrew Grice, who complains that «nobody is talking about climate change» anymore.

talks about his funny but fact - filled documentary, which follows actual left - wing scientists who examine the evidence, become climate change skeptics — and are then ostracized by their peers.»

Orion Magazine: Can people who care about the planet's changing climate find ways to talk about the crisis that get beyond numbers and politics?

While those who stand in denial of climate change have failed in the last 15 years to produce a single, peer - reviewed scientific journal article that challenges the theory and evidence of human - induced climate change, mainstream media was, until very recently, covering the story (in more than half the cases, according to the academic researchers Boykoff and Boykoff) by quoting one scientist talking about the risks and one purported expert saying that climate change was not happening — or might actually be a good thing.

The second is the undecided majority — people who are open to information, and when we talk about facts and data on climate change, that they're wiling to entertain it.

Ezra Levant Show: «Marc Morano of ClimateDepot.com talks about his funny but fact - filled documentary, which follows actual left - wing scientists who examine the evidence, become climate change skeptics — and are then ostracized by their peers.»

When I have given talks about climate change over the years, one of my most common questions is: «Yes, I get all of your information, but how can I respond to my uncle, brother - in - law or friend who refuses to accept climate change.»

His talk, which was recorded and has been posted to the TEDx YouTube page, addressed the idea of climate scientists as «planetary physicians» who can provide the public with factual information and useful advice about human - caused climate change.

Rud, when I talk to those of the Progressive Left who are most concerned about climate change, and who want the United States to become the leader in finding ways to reduce carbon emissions, they pretty much go silent when I inform them that the EPA has legal authority under the Clean Air Act and the 2009 Endangerment Finding to do much more in placing limits on carbon emissions than the agency is actually doing.

a former «science writer» who uses a speleological pseudonym «potholer54 ″ [to] sneeringly deliver a series of petty smears about artfully - distorted and often inconsequential aspects of my talks on climate change.

A new study in Global Environmental Change suggests that the loudest voices of dissent can affect the way researchers who have separately and repeatedly confirmed the reality of global climate change then talk about their own resChange suggests that the loudest voices of dissent can affect the way researchers who have separately and repeatedly confirmed the reality of global climate change then talk about their own reschange then talk about their own research.

As someone who speaks out against those who deny climate change — again and again and again and again — I knew exactly what Marshall Shepherd, the 2013 president of the American Meteorological Society, meant the moment he talked about having to slay the «zombie theories of climate science.»

ABC Anchor, Dan Harris: There are so many scientists who disagree with what you're saying, the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change], NASA, NOAA, the National Academy of Science, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Geophysical Union, the American Meteorological Society - we're talking about scientists all over the globe.

Those who have steered Obama in the tactical direction of talking about the need for a clean energy transformation as if this challenge could be addressed without recognizing that it is intertwined with climate science and the consequences of unchecked climate change have put things on the wrong track.

During MSNBC's coverage of Hurricane Irma on Saturday, NextGen Climate founder Tom Steyer argued that politicians who take money from fossil fuel companies and lie about climate change don't want to talk about climate change now because they have «enabledClimate founder Tom Steyer argued that politicians who take money from fossil fuel companies and lie about climate change don't want to talk about climate change now because they have «enabledclimate change don't want to talk about climate change now because they have «enabledclimate change now because they have «enabled»

I'm not talking about climate change, yes be mad or not about that too, but I'm talking about the global elite who are ripping us off EVERYDAY.

«How are we ever going to achieve climate justice,» Gualinga asks, «if we keep on criminalizing those who are actually fighting climate change, and not just only talking about it?»

So we appreciate that someone who then picks up the phone and sits down to talk about climate change with people like Pope Francis, US Secretary of State John Kerry, and UN Secretary General Ban Ki - moon.

Obama talked about clean energy, then started to back into global warming and climate science («I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change....»)

Ben Kirtman, a climate scientist at the University of Miami and a lead author of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's latest assessment, said he and other scientists have tried talking to politicians in Florida about these risks, including both Scott and Rubio, who is a possible presidential contender iclimate scientist at the University of Miami and a lead author of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's latest assessment, said he and other scientists have tried talking to politicians in Florida about these risks, including both Scott and Rubio, who is a possible presidential contender iClimate Change's latest assessment, said he and other scientists have tried talking to politicians in Florida about these risks, including both Scott and Rubio, who is a possible presidential contender in 2016.

You have painted them all with a convenient brush for your theory, but that doesn't work with any knowledge of the many individuals in this 97 % who only want to talk about the science, and the explanations of past and current climate and how it can change in the future.

In other words, Pachauri — who likes to talk about social justice and the moral obligations associated with climate change — is the worst kind of hypocrite.

Pipher gave a 20 - minute TEDx talk about her book, which you can watch below, but for anyone who's ever felt discouraged by climate change, I do highly recommend you pick up the book.

The talk of impending peak oil and climate change might give fodder to those who talk about the dark side of transition towns, but the ultimate message is one of hope — namely that it's time to roll up your sleeves and get engaged with the challenges we face.

«As we talk about policies that would make cool roofs an important climate mitigation measure all across the world, we want to know how things change in a country like India, which has more pollution,» said Surabi Menon, a climate scientist at Berkeley Lab who is one of the lead researchers on the project.

These other functions aren't always easy to disentangle from climate research, Gavin Schmidt, who directs NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, argues here: «Chopping off science just to prevent people from talking about climate change won't work.

He seems thoughtful and rational but when I talk to others who worry about climate change, I am told his proposals are too risky.

He frames the talk as a result of a challenge issued on Twitter — he was debating some prominent left - leaning commentators who said they always shy away from discussing climate change because they don't know enough about the complex issue to defend the position that we should be addressing it.