«Until we know the power of divine grace, we read in the Bible concerning eternal punishment, and we think it is too heavy and too hard, and we are apt to kick against it, and find out some heretic or other
who teaches us another doctrine; but when the soul is really quickened by divine grace, and made to feel the weight of sin, it thinks the bottomless pit none too deep, and the punishment of hell none too severe for sin such as it has committed.
But it is not just the winds of doctrine that blow immature Christians around, it is also the false teachers
who teach these doctrines.
Those who teach a doctrine of sanctification in the Wesleyan, Holiness tradition, the «three works of grace.»
Not exact matches
For now there are many religious sects / denominations due to man - made
doctrines and people
who believe but are too lazy to read the word and seek God for themselves so they hook themselves to a sect / denomination and are
taught the leaders belief system instead of the pure word.
The document criticizes «doctrinal or disciplinary security,» «an obsession with the law,» «punctilious concern for...
doctrine,» «dogmatism,» «hiding behind rules and regulations,» and «a rigid resistance to change,» while reprimanding those
who «give excessive importance to certain rules,» overemphasize «ecclesial rules,» believe that «
doctrine... is a closed system,» «feel superior to others because they observe certain rules,» have «an answer for every question,» wish to «exercise a strict supervision over others» lives,» «long for a monolithic body of
doctrine guarded by all and leaving no room for nuance,» believe that «we give glory to God... simply by following certain ethical norms,» and «look down on others like heartless judges, lording it over them and always trying to
teach them lessons.»
I would ask those
who have left, or study the differences between Mormon
doctrines and Christ's
teachings.
My father also
taught me, even when I was a child, that Bruce R. McConkie,
who wrote some unflattering stuff about non-whites in «Mormon
Doctrine,» stood in Conference after the 1978 announcement and said he had obviously been wrong on those points, and he retracted everything not in keeping with the Brethren's announcement.
Anyone
who wants to get the official church
doctrines should visit the website"mormon.org» not detractor's false
teachings.
They exist to
teach a certain set of
doctrines / beliefs to people
who want to be indoctrinated in that system, which will convince certain types of churches that they are «experts» in
doctrine and perhaps Bible and therefore should make a valued employee
who will perpetuate the beliefs of the group.
Why is it that Calvinists,
who claim to
teach «The
Doctrines of Grace» are so ungracious when dealing with those
who disagree?
But anyway, I myself struggle with the same question you asked about pastors
who know and embrace the full implications of Calvinism, and I have to say I DO regard a pastor like that as one
who teaches False
Doctrine and
who is dangerous because of it.
I agree that the church keeps people away by
teaching wrong
doctrine such as hell being a place of everlasting torment -
who wants to serve a God like that.
In this book, a sequel to his much acclaimed Ascension and Ecclesia, Farrow, a Catholic theologian
who teaches Christian thought at McGill University, presents what he hopes is a «more accessible sketch» of the relevance of the
doctrine of the Ascension.
But this is
taught in many churches, that those
who do not agree with specific church
doctrine / dogma are not healthy to be around.
Heresy and
Doctrine in the Early Church In the first few centuries of Christianity, teachers
taught wildly different ideas about
who Jesus was.
Of course there are many churches
who teach non-traditional views of the
doctrines you've listed above, so I'm sure you could find some church that wouldn't care.
Section 188 of the Austrian Criminal Code, called «Vilification of Religious
Teachings», criminalizes «Anyone
who publicly disparages a person or thing that is the object of worship of a domestic church or religious society, or a
doctrine».
The liberals
who abandoned this
teaching clearly broke with explicit
doctrines of Wesley.
On the other hand the scribe
who fears the Pharisee does not
teach the differences between heresy and sound Bible
doctrine; nor does he
teach the historical views to understanding the Bible.
On the other hand, there were other men
who disagreed: Tertullian,
who believed that the soul would live on forever, that the wicked would suffer misery in proportion to the righteous» reward; St. Augustine,
who came up with the
doctrines of Original Sin and Predestination (some would be saved, the rest would be damned); and Jerome,
who would end up retranslating the Latin Bible into what would become the Latin Vulgate and would twist various scriptures that talked about eonian chastening into
teaching eternal torment.
When we see that the gospel contains a whole host of truths and
doctrines to believe and
teach and also a broad spectrum of behaviors to practice and obey, those
who believe Christians should be listening to more sermons and attending more Bible studies can nod and smile toward those
who prefer to be out feeding the poor and tending the sick, and vice versa.
He must hold firmly to the trustworthy message as it has been
taught, so that he can encourage others by sound
doctrine and refute those
who oppose it.
Calvinists have also been known to use this verse against other Christians
who disagree with the Calvinistic
teachings and
doctrines.
Only persons
who adhere to that
doctrine, of the duty to seek truth and do justice through unrestricted disciplined investigation of the same, are fit to
teach in an authentic democracy.
For those of you
who feel that LDS
doctrine is at odds with Christian
doctrine, first learn what LDS
doctrine is, then read the Bible (something few on this board probably do) then you will realize that LDS
doctrine is in line with Christ's
teaching perfectly.
A more sophisticated screening of Scripture is carried out by others
who claim that we must look in Scripture for the «locus classicus» of a Biblical
doctrine and concentrate on its
teaching, interpreting all else in light of its truth.
That being said, not many people are aware of these anomalies on our planet since there is no formal
teaching which questions religions and / or deductions of our archaeologists; for this reason, we can not blame anyone
who has been raised with strict religious
doctrine wishing to display their religious symbol.
Brunner appeals explicitly to the prologue of John and to certain sayings of Paul, but surely one
who is as emphatic as he in rejecting the authority of Scriptural
teachings as such does not mean to say that we accept the
doctrine of creation because of the presence of these passages in the New Testament.
One correspondent expressed what was clearly the dominant view among those
who attend the Masses, that «It is not the
teaching of the «Church» that we should refrain from sexual activity outside of marriage, but the
doctrine of the Vatican.
Teachers
who are going to
teach in this area should be expected to give an affirmation that they believe inand will
teach the moral
doctrines of the Catholic Church.
That people
who can't even
teach proper
doctrine are on this list is terrifying in itself.
The Crouches are known for being indifferent to correct
doctrine and / or
teaching false
doctrine, and for inviting guests onto their televsion programs
who promote heretical
doctrines.
As reiterated in the 1990 encyclical Redemptoris Missio and the 2000 instruction from the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith, Dominus Iesus, the
teaching is that everyone
who is saved is saved through the redemptive work of Christ, whether or not they have ever heard of Christ.
A friend
who has been
teaching a course on constitutional law for a couple of decades and has achieved a national reputation confided recently that he plans to stop
teaching the course; there just isn't any integrity to the subject, and it becomes almost a degrading experience to have to
teach, say, equal protection
doctrine and pretend that the Court's decisions are the product of any sort of coherent thinking.
One
who is born, for example, into a Christian group which
teaches the
doctrine of perfection may be expected to interpret a decisive religious experience as the granting of perfect love by the Holy Spirit.
Hence, a person
who» becomes as a young child»,
who acts as a «lesser one», is one
who allows themselves to be
taught by our Creator, Jehovah God, rejecting creeds,
doctrines and traditions that are not based on the Bible, just as Jesus did.
Scripture
teaches that we all have a responsibility to grow into maturity and not remain baby Christians
who are easily knocked off course by dodgy
doctrines or by chasing after faddish spiritual practices.
Studies of 19th - century topics (with concern for contemporary relevance) have been undertaken by Gayle Carlton Felton,
who examined Methodist baptismal
teaching and practices in the previous century (Duke, 1987), and by Carol Marie Norén,
who studied the
doctrine of Christian perfection as expressed in the preaching of a Swedish - American Methodist preacher of sanctification, Nels O. Westergreen (Princeton University, 1986) A dissertation on 19th - century Methodist services for marriage and burial is currently under way at Notre Dame by Karen Westerfield Tucker.
No need to take my word, warning comes before destruction and it Jesus Christ
who shall give you the very evidence that you refused to accept while being alive and by then, it will be too late for the unbeliever and the religious people
who has
taught false
doctrines.
It is the function of codified
doctrines and authoritative
teachings to determine
who is in and
who is outside the system.
In discussing the kind of
doctrine that ought to be
taught to Jesuit students, he wrote in the Constitutions: «The
doctrine which they ought to follow in each subject should be that which is safest and most approved, as also the authors
who teach it» (no. 358).
When the
teachings of the Church are attacked and their advocates described publicly as bigots,
who is there to come forward to restate and defend the universal principles that underlie Catholic
doctrine on abortion, homosexual and extramarital sex, euthanasia and so forth?
The fact that different schools of thought have come to different conclusions after reading the same bible does nt seem to register with many christians
who effectively hold to the position «My
doctrine is what the bible
teaches so the other view is wrong».
One
who affirms a
doctrine of apostolic succession culminating in the authority of the bishop of Rome must not only choose between succession of
teaching or succession of office (as J. B. Lightfoot in his own day understood), but also surmount the historiographical difficulty posed by the early Church's transition from apostles to presbyters, and from presbyters to a single monarchical bishop.
Martin Luther's interpretation of Paul's writings heavily influenced Luther's
doctrine of sola fide.So John
who is into credentials is not respecting the credentials of Saint John.With Paul's upbringing and
teachings he would not even think it was ok to be gay and might be the one to kill you if you were.
Either you misquoted 1Corinthians 11:3 (also look at Ephesians 5:23 as well) or you're
teaching a false
doctrine it is God
who is Head over Christ and CHRIST (JESUS)
who is the head and authority over man NOT «THE ELDERS».
I hate to say «
who decides the doctrinal
teachings of the church» (even tho that's what I think it is) because the word ««
doctrine» has taken on unnecessary baggage (after all, what you wrote is «
doctrine» —
doctrine in itself ain't bad — it's what we do with it).
Those
who are more mature in the faith,
who know sound
doctrine, should be the ones
who decided what to
teach.
They are easily deceived by false
doctrine and those
who teach these strange ideas.
Most people
who teach false
doctrine are fully convinced of the truth of it themselves.