Sentences with phrase «who think of»

«For almost all states, there's no precedent of having black female leadership, so it's not like you're immediately considered for the role and also the kingmakers... oftentimes are white men who are ensconced in politics who think of other white men first and foremost,» Greer continued.
As monopoly owners of the commons who think of our environment the way Johnny Carson thought of his time, we could have more money coming in while we also secure larger parks, more nature reserves, less pollution, and better resource management.
Although the terms political philosophy and political theory are used rather indiscriminately, those who think of themselves as political philosophers tend to link what they do closely to philosophical and moral principles; while those who call themselves political theorists tend to appeal to facts about the world and to the way in which the structures and processes of social and political life limit the possibilities for the realisation of those principles by political agency.
Those who think of themselves as democrats would do well to remember these issues.
She said, «When people who think of Belly Dance, most think of seductive ladies dancing around men smoking hookah pipes, but it was actually a dance and movement form that dates back originally to the Red Tent — women helping other women in labor.
Angelina Jolie is not who I think of when I think of breastfeeding mamas in it for the long haul.
We need adults who think of touching and being touched as human and normal.»
Most people who think of cloth diapering envision something similar to pre-folds, and many use these for burp clothes even if they haven't chosen to use cloth for diapering.
Society / the media perpetuates this myth that men are horn dogs who think of nothing but sex.
Only those who think of others, and put them ahead of themselves truly escape that truism only to be trampled into the mud of poverty and loneliness by others who don't care.
Now there is a guy who sits somewhere behind me who I think of as Mr. Know - It - All.
It does not really matter if d coach is changed has long has d club have board members n ownesr who think of only their pockets Arsenal will always roll in d mud.
But Red Sox fans — who think of themselves aggrandizingly as a Nation, not a family — have suffered more grotesquely.
Look I'm all in favour of getting the most for your talent but you should still give your best at the club you are with and not keep the fans who think of you as there hero worrying if you are going.
Simple question to all who think of them self as Wengerits, i mean Wenger supporters.
The senile coach, the unambitious less board of directors who think of their pockets and not the club should all go.
There is one more man who I think of in the same way as the deluded dictator pulling his empire apart with his every deed: Arsene Wenger!
And we have proved business people in the Arsenal set up, who think all of this is making business sense (ignoring the football)??
Time and time again, people who think of themselves as loyal above all else wind up feeling betrayed, and / or behaving in ways that seem strangely backhanded themselves.
He is creating those puss #ies and the ones who think of them selfs as some kind of champions do leave the club for good.
What about Ramsey who think of himself as a striker and always chasing glory.
Of course, there are also many people who think of pumpkin as a veggie.
One thinks of William Temple, who in more ways than one deserved the phrase humorously applied to him in early days, «not one, but all mankind in effigy,» 46 Those who think of him first of all as philosopher, Christian socialist, ecumenical statesman, or evangelist should remember that it was the priesthood of the Church of England to which his life was primarily devoted, and by its traditions that he was inspired.
As a matter of fact, the Acts of the Apostles has come to belong to all persons in all ages who think of themselves as dear to God and who have been blessed by this book.
Inadvertently, those process thinkers who think of the Jesus - event as the common element of form that is the defining characteristic of the society called the church can be interpreted to depict the Jesus - event as having agency, as the mind of the organism, in a manner of speaking, that subsumes the individuality of it members.
Most people who think of him as a racist point to a few articles he wrote as vice president» though I do not think that serious biographers have tarred him as a supporter of the eugenics movement.
The trouble is that not only has this understandable reticence deprived the dialogue of the vigor it needs to survive, but it has also produced another unfortunate consequence: Christians who think of Jesus as a model in other areas of their lives do not look to his example or teaching for direction in the dialogue itself.
Then there are those, far more interesting, who think of God as, at best, a construct of the social psyche.
It's the level of cognitive dissonance within religious communities about other communities that confuses those of us who think all of them are a bit strange.
Writing on the website Spiked, Ann Furedi, the head of BPAS (the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, a euphemism similar to «Planned Parenthood»), notes that «most people who think of themselves as liberal and modern - thinking believe that rape, incest, youth, poverty or even general «unwantedness» are «good reasons» for doctors to approve abortion; and they think «sex selection» is a bad reason, which should be stopped.»
Its boldness of movement can never be clear to those who think of the Platonic dialogues as a mass of astute but non-committal propositions.
That means that those curialists who think of themselves as courtiers must either be converted to a different self - understanding or replaced.
What those who think of marriage as a trap, as an «artificial social arrangement,» overlook is that the real artificiality takes place when persons seek the joys of union without the risks of marriage and of growing love.
The religion of «Christian» scientists is probably a little different from the religion of the «Christians» who think of science as some kind of cult in its own right.
I know myself and know that those who I think of as deceived have the ability to drain the very life from me.
Fitzgerald's image suggests that talk about a religious mainline is increasingly problematic and that those of us who think of ourselves as mainliners ought to find more realistic images of who we are.
Erich Neumann, among others, has shown how those who think of themselves as strong and self - sufficient may at times project their inner sense of inferiority onto the more vulnerable ethnic, economic, and religious groups in their social environment.
There is, as we have noted, a debate between those who define the last end of the Church individualistically as salvation of souls and those who think of it as the realization of the redeemed society.
They are extremely creative people who think of new ways of doing things, and come up with new ideas, and have the ability to get them out to large numbers of people.
How will this vigorous trinitarianism play out in interreligious dialogue or, more pointedly, in dialogue or more pointedly, in dialogue with the emerging school of theologians who think of themselves as pluralists?
Indeed, those who think of marriage as only about love tend to argue against these duties, since they are regretted when feelings change.
Their antics are only the most visible (partly because they are sometimes the most silly) examples of how liberal institutions influence people who think of themselves as basically apolitical.
I have been kicking around on this with a couple of folks who think of me as a heretic as well, I will post the longer version on my blog.
But spouses who think of each other as good and virtuous people encourage each other to live up to that ideal.
Such a question faces not merely classicists, but all who think of Western culture as a continuous history, all who think the Greeks can, somehow, help us.
He is undervalued by those who think of him as being, outside theology, no more than an erratic commentator on Aristotle.
Having quoted from scripture, likewise there may be some who think of me as a so - called «believer» or «biblical Christian».
These chains and locally owned stores, found all over the country, are usually run by people who think of their work as a real vocation.
Those who think of themselves as angels may end up by giving themselves license to do things that are, in fact, quite beastly.
I mean, obviously, to support those who think of the future usefulness of these bodies, and of their federative structures, in «gathered - church» more than in «churchly» terms — at that juncture I agree with Dean Kelley (Why Conservative Churches Are Growing [Harper & Row, 1972]-RRB- To put this concretely, let me offer just one example.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z