Sentences with phrase «who took the matter to court»

But the accountability button was pushed by pressure group, Occupy Ghana and Citizen Ghana Movement who took the matter to court demanding that the Transport Ministry be forced to make full disclosure of its contract with the company.

Not exact matches

«But every assault should be taken care of in a court of law, and to accuse — no matter who it is, a man or a woman — without evidence, it's damaging and it's unfair.»

«Settle matters quickly with your adversary who is taking you to court.

When the soldier refused, citing a Supreme Court ruling that states there was no requirement to pray in public ceremonies, the officer then took the matter to the platoon sergeant, who also told the soldier to bow their head for uniformity purposes, according to Patrick Jones, a Ft. Jackson Public Affairs Officer.

And no matter who wins that time, the loser can take the ruling to the Federal Courts, which has numerous layers and appeals processes.

Second question: Even though this matter is in court and I don't want to go into it, the fact of the matter is that the reply, when we took the matter to court, was that the government was not involved in the demolition and they don't know who demolished the house.

It, therefore, comes as a surprise that INEC, which was a party to the matter, can not advise political parties on the right course to take but, instead, continues to encourage politicians to embark on illegal actions through active participation of its officials, who are sent to observe such illegal primaries, whereas the apex court in the land has ruled on such matter.

Ikanya, who called on the police to investigate the matter, said, «The Attorney - General of Rivers State, Chinwenwo Aguma, SAN, had boasted that since the police had refused to produce Dr. Lloyd, they (the prosecution) would ensure that Lloyd appeared in court to take a plea «their own way» and six hours later, the country home of Lloyd was bombed and razed.

Paladino, who has not ruled out another run for governor, has said if he's thrown off the board, he'll take the matter to court.

The Court rejected the position taken by 19 out of 20 Member States who submitted observations to the Court, and once again supported the view that EU Member States are required to act jointly first in matters which may affect the EU legal order.

What we witness without a whimper from the media, the courts, or the bar is a prosecutor charged with the highest professional duty to see that every accused, no matter how guilty, obtains a fair trial, and who, instead, in this historical instant, has voluntarily taken steps to see that such a right becomes little more than a sad, distant echo of a justice system that once set the standard for the world.

Eugene Meehan, a lawyer at Supreme Advocacy LLP in Ottawa who specializes in Supreme Court of Canada matters and is a former executive legal officer to the court, agrees that retirement in a foreseeable number of years «may take some candidates out of the mix» despite all of them being highly qualified for the posiCourt of Canada matters and is a former executive legal officer to the court, agrees that retirement in a foreseeable number of years «may take some candidates out of the mix» despite all of them being highly qualified for the posicourt, agrees that retirement in a foreseeable number of years «may take some candidates out of the mix» despite all of them being highly qualified for the position.

While the rest of the Anglo - Saxon world happily adopted the principles of a «fused» profession, where the same lawyers both prepare the cases and take matters to court, the English (and Welsh) trundle on with an antediluvian system which seems to suit primarily those people who benefit most from it: barristers.

Specifically will a Canadian court take an adverse inference against a party who has deliberately used an ephemeral messaging platform to discuss matters that are at issue in litigation?

Anybody going through such a situation should never have to fight with insurance companies, or deal with another driver who is insisting that they are not culpable for the accident, possibly threatening to take the matter in court.

We are experienced litigators who will not hesitate to take legal matters to court.

Under section 72 of the 1996 Act, a party who takes no part in the arbitral proceedings can apply to the court for a declaration or injunction restraining arbitration proceedings by challenging: (i) the validity of an arbitration agreement; (ii) whether the arbitral tribunal has been properly constituted; or (iii) the matters that have been referred to arbitration.

Justice Nadon decided not to take his seat until the matter was settled, and Justice Marshall Rothstein, who had served as Nadon's colleague on the Federal Court of Appeal, recused himself.

«It's a real wake - up call to individuals who are both engaged in the construction industry and also those of us who represent individuals in the construction industry because of the interest the courts have had, and clearly continue to take, in matters related to health and safety both under the Criminal Code and Occupational Health and Safety Act,» she says.

Those serving demands without the benefit of a judgment should also bear in mind that the courts have taken a dim view of creditors who use the process merely as a threat to the debtor with no intention of following the matter through to the bankruptcy stage.

There will always be that one or two percent of the people who no matter how much you explain to them that their result in mediation is going to be superior to that of a result dragged through the adversarial legal system and watered down by warring lawyers taking sides and entrenching in their positions, will want to take their chances and go to court.

Three Bloomfield Hills kids who refused an order by a judge to go to lunch with their father have been ordered to a juvenile detention facility.The Tsimhoni family was in Oakland County's family court for a hearing on supervised parenting time when Judge Lisa Gorcyca took matters into her own hands.

The court also included in the Sciarratta ruling a clear indictment of the attitude many judges take that says that a borrower who defaults deserves to have their home foreclosed upon, no matter who does the foreclosing.