Sentences with phrase «who use the doctrines»

Not exact matches

Have you noticed that those who use the term almost always follow its use by their «interpretation» of what Scripture (usually certain specific passages, which result in certain specific doctrines) says?

Calvinists have also been known to use this verse against other Christians who disagree with the Calvinistic teachings and doctrines.

Dr. Gary North, a major figure among the Dominionists, clarifies their goal and tactics: «We must use the doctrine of religious liberty... until we train up a generation of people who know that there is no religious neutrality, no neutral law, no neutral education, and no neutral civil government.

Too bad, we could use priests who are able to accept the doctrine along with the fallible people who come with it.

Some sociological studies of how the doctrine of karma is actually used in daily life suggest, however, that it does not inhibit a parent seeking a cure for a child who is ill.

I used to be one of those pastors who argued over members and doctrines.

We have become way too much eyeball people as Christians assume that those who don't live according to the way they do they are unsaved, we have created this judgemental relationship which hurts peoples fellowship with God, there are no litmus tests for people that believe in Jesus, which is why we are called to not judge others, and people use James 2:14, and 1 John's verse of those who practices righteousness are righteous even though I think it's talking about earthly righteousness toward people that we as Christians should show because there is a lost world out there that needs are help and these doctrines of guilt, condemnation, anger, and judgement aren't helping in fact they are doing the opposite, just like how in James it's justification towards man.

Though there are people among the «priestly class», as you call it, that use the doctrine of inspiration to lord their educated / professional status over the average church members, there are plenty of others (such as my pastor, and probably most every Calvary Chapel pastor) who approach their charge as shepherds of the flock with the proper attitude of a helper and clarifier to the flock seeking to understand the meaning of the Bible.

You would agree then that the problem is not with the doctrine but with people who are not being «imitators of God» in how they are using what they believe?

If it were not for the doctrine of original sin, which follows from the resurrection — just as a parting glance at who we used to be follows from seeing ourselves as we are coming to be — we would be left with a religion requiring us to «get it right,» and that is no joy at all.

There is the further psychological insight that the person who uses religious language very freely, and who appears completely dependent on pious feelings and sentiments, may be concealing a profound disbelief in the very doctrines he aggressively affirms.

The traditional Roman Catholic doctrine is derived from Irenaeus, who noted that two words, tselem and demuth are used in Genesis I to assert that God has created man in his image.

The Bible presupposes a right and a wrong interpretation of Jesus» coming and the nature and character of God, as it uses strong language against false teachers who promote doctrines that undermine the gospel.

the Egyptians had TWO souls), passed to the Greeks, in turn passed to the Romans, who used it to scare the populace, and keep them in line, and added it to the Babylonian idea that it could go to a «lower area», (the doctrine of the «Terrible Torments»), which later, Christianity adopted.

For a blogger who wants to bring doctrine to life, its confusing you don't want us to use scripture to justify our means of survival and ministry.

Politician who use religious doctrine as a governing platform should be excluded from office.

What happened later was a clarification of language and terminology used to describe the doctrine in response to those who did not believe it.

J. M. Sterrett defines Antinomianism as follows: «In its widest sense the term is used to designate the doctrines of extreme fanatics who deny subjection to any law other than the subjective caprices of the empirical individual, though this individual is generally credited as the witness and interpreter of the Holy Spirit.»

It was frequently remarked that those who wished to display their learning or who were fearful lest the gospel give offense spent the major portion of their time dividing the text and multiplying doctrines to the neglect of the «uses» wherein «a sermon's excellency doth consist.»

Placed in the context of what to do about Libya the difference between Obama and Cameron (and by inference Cameron and Clegg, who also used the phrase) that air power but not ground troops is acceptable and sufficient is a good indicator of how much muscle the debate surrounding the doctrine will allow to be flexed in this case.

Betsy DeVos has served on the board of the Acton Institute which has featured events by Christian Dominionist Gary North who is on record writing, without irony: «So let us be blunt about it: we must use the doctrine of religious liberty to gain independence for Christian schools until we train up a generation of people who know that there is no religious neutrality, no neutral law, no neutral education, and no neutral civil government.

The German army will receive the Joint Operations Doctrine, specializing in artillery strikes and the Offensive Spearhead Doctrine for players who like to use heavy armor and airstrikes to defeat their opponents.

Negligence per se is another type of doctrine that can be used on behalf of a victim who wishes to seek compensation for his or her injuries from a dog bite.

Moreover, in many of these cases, Nevada law allows victims to use the zone - of - danger rule and expand the foreseeability doctrine, so even victims who do not suffer a physical injury may be entitled to compensation.

Corp. [2] unanimously recognized the doctrine holding that brand - name prescription drug manufacturers owe a duty to warn to consumers who use generic drugs.

(All of the above is also quite contrasted with the audio copyright trolling on YouTube, where basically anyone who's ever posted anything on YouTube receives claims for copyright infringement from various agents in the presence of even the shortest audio clips that you'd think should clearly fall within the fair - use doctrine.)

Of course, the most obvious distinction is that theft is a legal wrong which can be prosecuted if committed as a crime, while adverse possession is a curative doctrine used to determine who owns the property at a given time rather than to punished or affirmative sue someone.

This is important for two reasons: One, the case is a big victory for end users — customers who buy products or utilize services — who increasingly find themselves targeted by patent trolls; two, patent exhaustion is an important legal doctrine that can and should be used more to protect those facing troll threats.

Now, Google and other developers who copy an API without having a license to do so may have only one defense: a doctrine in copyright law called «fair use.»

The doctrine of licensee estoppel does not bar a challenger who argues that the mark became generic after the challenger's license for use had expired or was terminated.