Sentences with phrase «who values argument»

I can't say I understand the Z of Z theory, or the theoretical approach you are taking, but I'm interested — as one who values argument (from arg — to shine, build up a shared «shine» — initially argument had positive connotation) I am impressed by the gap separating the «good» that we know and can say, and yet are unable to practice.

Not exact matches

The argument comes from veteran value investor David Winters, portfolio manager of Wintergreen Fund, who in his latest letter to shareholders says that the typical S&P 500 index fund incurred expenses of over 4.3 % in 2016.

However, there is one factor commonly overlooked by those who make this argument; the size of gold bars and coins relative to their value.

He finds these values as well in the handiwork of «insurrectionists» from Daniel Shays to John Brown to Timothy McVeigh, and in the arguments of neo-republican legal scholars such as Amar, Sanford Levinson and David Williams, who find a mandate for revolutionary resistance to oppressive government in the Second Amendment right to bear arms.

The deepest convictions of men in favor of future hope, therefore, have come not so much from those who have framed arguments for it as from those who have heightened life's spiritual value, given it new meaning, made it wealthy with fresh significance and purpose until it has seemed as though it ought to go on.

C. S. Lewis» recognition of a fact - value dichotomy within an argument against ethical subjectivism in The Abolition of Man has no doubt contributed something to the frequency with which «values» is used by both Catholics and Protestants who want to defend «traditional values.»

Polkinghorne's discussion of the resurrection focuses, in contrast, on general philosophical arguments to the effect that «in order to confirm... the claim that the integrity of personal experience itself, based as it is in the significance and value of individual men and women and the ultimate and total intelligibility of the universe, requires that there be an eternal ground of hope who is the giver and preserver of human individuality and the eternally faithful Carer for creation.»

What is needed is a Catholic theological interpretation of modern pluralistic democracy, one that insists on real space for the ideas and active contributions of religious traditions, while underscoring the value of respectful argument and even friendship among those who hold competing views.

In a statement quoted by Hasker in his discussion of what he calls a «more subtle form» of the above argument (although it simply is my argument), I said that according to traditional free will theism it would have been possible for God to create «creatures who could enjoy all the same values which we human beings enjoy, except that they would not really be free» (Process 74).

«Governor Cuomo's entire argument on school funding is just one big excuse to ignore the lives of students who are black or brown or working class,» said Nixon, who added that the governor's budget «does not value the lives of the majority of New York's children.»

While Mr. Cuomo and his aides made the argument that his support of legalizing same - sex marriage and stricter gun control laws more than cemented his progressive bona fides, many in the WFP remained unconvinced that Mr. Cuomo — who bragged at the State Democratic Convention about how he had slashed taxes — could adequately represent their party's core values.

Kahn, a former state Supreme Court justice who was appointed a federal judge in 1996, recently instructed both sides to stop filing legal arguments, saying he has enough information to decide the key pre-trial issues on injury and diminution of property values.

Scientists frequently lament the scarcity of effective scientific communicators — those who can explain complex concepts to the public, present scientifically sound alternatives to policy - makers, and make cogent arguments for the value of science to society.

In the latest film, the restless twentysomethings who met in 1995 and reconnected in 2004 are in their 40s and married with kids but are still having the same old arguments about personal values and whether it's possible to retain individual will in the context of a long - term romantic relationship.

But I'm also swayed by the argument, forcefully articulated by Whitehurst, who points to the body of empirical work suggesting that test scores — and value - added differences — matter.

Wagner's argument in his book «Creating Innovators: The Making of Young People Who Will Change the World» is that our K - 12 and college tracks are not consistently «adding the value and teaching the skills that matter most in the marketplace.»

-- This is really just the bar of gold (counter --RRB- argument in disguise: A bar of gold has no yield — so what's its intrinsic value, who knows how high / low it might trade, maybe it's even ultimately worthless?!

Still, an argument can be made that the continued promotion of Buy - and - Hold has done even greater harm to young investors, who will be experiencing not only big drops in their portfolio values but the loss of decades of compounding returns that they would have enjoyed on those amounts had they been able to gain access to realistic guidance on how stock investing works in the real world.

For those who value gameplay above all else it's probably one to skip, but if you're seeking something more story and emotion driven then Last Day of June is for you, and makes a compelling argument for why games can be as much art as anything else.

I always get into arguments with people who want to retain the old values in painting — the humanistic values they always find on the canvas.

«I always get into arguments,» he once said, «with people who want to retain the «old values» in painting — the «humanistic» values that they always find on the canvas.

I always get into arguments with people who want to retain the old values in painting — the humanistic values that they always find on the canvas.

«Kuhn's book (William: Kuhn's book «The Structure of Scientific Revolutions» challenged the popular belief that scientists (William: Particularly including «climate» scientists who are extraordinary resistive to the piles and piles of logical arguments / observations / analysis results that indicate their theories are urban myths due to the climate wars) are skeptical, objective, and value - neutral thinkers.

Even David Roberts, the liberal blogger who popularized the term «climate hawk,» wrote a piece a few years ago that said values often hide behind what look like numerical arguments.

We need people speaking from knowledge and expertise to begin to shift that big portion of the public who take denialist arguments at face value.

This group writes about groaning in dismay at the unnecessary length of some submissions, at the failure of the attorney to focus on a particular or effective legal argument rather than applying a scattershot approach, and at attorneys who appeal to emotion or personal values at the expense of persuasive and effective legal analysis.

But the persons who argue that alternative structures will undermine these values offer no proof of their arguments, no empirical research — they simply imagine a multitude of scenarios, more or less plausible, in which it could happen, and then assert that it necessarily will happen.

This argument has some merit if lawyers who are in economic association with non-lawyers, were immune from our current duties, values and regulations — but, they would not.

Perhaps the most compelling argument is the value of Indigenous languages to the people who speak them.

Ross continued with what he must regard as more of his value argument with: ``... I summarized their expectations by asking if they felt it reasonable to expect a highly experienced broker who is confident in his self - worth and truly cares about his clients, to accept an over-priced, minimum term listing of a sub-standard property owned by someone who doesn't seem to value loyalty or expertise, and with a heavily discounted commission rate.»

Conversely, a brokerage who may want to argue in favour of charging a commission that is on the higher side, doesn't have as easy a task communicating their value, because their value argument involves a technical understanding of the business, and we may wonder how we'll stand with the Competition Bureau of Canada for having done so.