Sentences with phrase «who wrote a case»

Not exact matches

Rather than relying on high - profile examples that everyone is writing about, such as Steve Jobs, consider case studies of other successful people who may be under the radar.

All the witnesses have given written declarations in the legal briefs already filed in the case, said an Apple lawyer on Friday, who spoke to reporters on a conference call on condition of anonymity.

Goldman remembered the idea and called Nalebuff, who had just written a case study about the Tata Tea company in India.

As the storm approached Friday, Mayor Pro Tem Patrick Rios of Rockport requested that people who did not evacuate write their names and Social Security numbers on their arms in case rescuers later needed to identify them.

That doesn't have to always be the case, notes Melissa Bradley, director of Kauffman's Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Innovation Initiative who writes about minority entrepreneurship for the foundation.

In the cases were someone requests and apology that you don't agree is deserved, you're left with two options, says Paul Lima, a business writing trainer who has written several books on business writing.

In case of any doubt, Wired also learned that, while at Harvard graduate school (right before dropping out to join Google) Damore wrote and performed in a skit about «Microtubule Jerking» and the women who helped with it.

These events naturally led to networks that went beyond his time at Stanford, but Walker's ability to make connections did not stop there, says Pfeffer, who was so impressed that he wrote a case study charting Walker's networking efforts.

In case you haven't heard, your dad is Mark Zuckerberg, 31, a quiet genius who reads and writes in Hebrew, French, Latin and ancient Greek.

In preparing to write this book, Chris identified 1,500 individuals who have built businesses earning $ 50,000 or more from a modest investment (in many cases, $ 100 or less), and from that group he's chosen to focus on the 50 most intriguing case studies.

«It's not that there's been one or two cases where people found mistakes in proxy reports, it seems that almost every issuer who wrote in had a specific experience where they believed factual errors have been made in their proxy reports which then leads to all sorts of problems,» says Tuzyk, who has had clients who have experienced this problem.

Hence those slackers who write everything in lower case, and those who lock their shift keys to FRANKLY ANNOYING EFFECT.

Jesse Eisinger, writing for the New Yorker, reported that the SEC attorney, James Kidney, who was in charge of bringing the ABACUS case to trial, wrote in an email to his boss at the SEC that it was an «unbelievable fraud.»

«Like a little baby who looks cuddly and cute, this proposed initiative would grow up to be the hulking teenager who eats everyone out of house and home,» writes Mr. Kesselman in a report titled Double Trouble: The Case Against Expanding Tax - Free Savings Accounts, published Tuesday by the left - leaning Broadbent Institute.

In a publicized case, the individual who wrote webinjections for the Gozi Trojan was arrested and charged for his activity, Reuters reported.

In 2014, I wrote an analysis of such a situation on my personal blog, examining the message board postings of a group of men and women who lost everything (and then some, in a few cases) betting on the stock of a single business called G.T. Advanced Technologies.

A few months ago, Blinder wrote an op - ed in the Wall Street Journal making the case for Yellen, who he said «outside the narrow confines of economists and people who dote on central banking... is virtually unknown.»

Once you know who you're writing your case study for, decide which project you want to write about.

Four years ago, I wrote about the case of Abdul Rahman, an Afghan convert to Christianity who was charged with apostasy (punishable by execution under Islamic law).

Even if the all copies of the Koran were destroyed in the world within a few hours new copies would be created by these people known as hafiz who have it memorized and in most cases even learned the proper scripts to write it in.

In some cases a list of books written by the author and links to other sites are included for those who wish further exploration.

And the book also offers a deliberately wide array of approaches to trinitarian issues, including not only historical and systematic theologians, but biblical scholars and analytic philosophers of religion, writing from a variety of theological and communal points of view» Roman Catholic, Protestant, and, in one case, Jewish (the New Testament scholar Alan Segal, who contributes an instructive if somewhat technical chapter on the role of conflicts between Jews and Christians in the emergence of early trinitarian teaching).

More than half of all defenses of slavery were written by pastors who cited Scripture to make their case, and Noll immerses the reader in primary sources to unpack and understand those defenses as well as the counter-arguments made by abolitionists.

So far, «most of the high - profile cases involve state or local actions that would not be covered by the federal protections,» said John Inazu, a professor at Washington University School of Law who has written several times about such cases for CT..

I write as a United Methodist pastor, currently a district superintendent, who had to deal with a recently disclosed, forty - year - old case of sexual misconduct in one of the churches in my district.

This is going to be a shock — the men who actually wrote all the parts in the Bible and made changes to the infrastructure of Christianity — including Constantine circa 300 AD in Rome — were not afraid of unleashing the occasional metaphor... in other words the Bible is not entirely literal — no, you are supposed to use your imagination... In many cases the disciples didn't actually witness an event — it was long distance and time altered hearsay — God figured Man could handle that... So don't be afraid to dilute - God's cool with that — as long as you do the right thing in life — feed the poor, help your neighbor, don't kill or covet - just be a good and decent person - smile, love and give generously... God doesn't need robots — He wants thoughtful individuals who help!!!

Writing early in his career on the case of «Brother Daniel,» a Jewish convert to Christianity who sought to immigrate to Israel under the Israeli law of return, Wyschogrod explained:

I don't believe this is the case for a second, but what if, as they continue to research this, they find a document which says, «These are the bones of Jesus who is written about in the Christian Gospels.

They were not written by the 4 evangelists and were probably written by individuals who had never seen nor heard a person called Jesus (as is the case fror Paul as well).

«We have no alternative but to admit,» Mommsen writes, «that a considerable number of those who played an active part in the July Plot, and in many cases lost their lives as a result, had previously participated in the war of racial extermination, or had at least approved of it for quite a time and in some cases had actively promoted it.

Carpenter makes the case for this modest but important assertion as well as anyone who has written about fundamentalism in recent years.

Chesterton wrote, «There is a case for telling the truth; there is a case for avoiding the scandal; but there is no possible defense for the man who tells the scandal, but does not tell the truth.»

God defined marriage, eh??? — Well... even if you believe iin the imaginary being... the «Bible» was written by men over many years... in some cases we aren't really sure who even wrote the books that were chosen to be in it (there were a bunch of writings not included)...

Here we are on much firmer ground than in the case of the Gospel narratives, for not only is it the earliest written testimony to the resurrection (written about twenty to twenty - five years after the death of Jesus), but it is first - hand testimony, and most probably the «only written testimony to come from one who could claim to be himself an «eye - witness» of the resurrection».18 Admittedly Paul, on his own admission, was in a very unusual category.

But the recent case of a lady who wrote an ADRT, took an overdose and went to A+E so that she could die with company, and who was left to die, does show what a diresituation we are in just now.

Of course, this is not totally the case, but those writers who have sought to extend the power of written words beyond this limitation have done so by developing an «oral style», seeking to involve the reader in conversation.

My case was one in which the author, editor and reader are all known entities (in fact, they all know each other personally); the reading takes place in the exact same cultural and social context as the writing and editing; and the reader is himself a really smart guy, Ivy - league Ph.D. and all, who had spent a decade training the editor to be a certain kind of editor, with specific tools unique to the specific publication's aims.

In the case of the people who wrote about jesus, sorry those people can't be confirmed and thus are not reliable.

According to Adamson, the case that Plotinus is the third most important thinker in western philosophy goes like this: «He fused together the doctrines he claimed to find in Plato with many of Aristotle's ideas, along with a healthy dose of Stoicism,» which was so appealing that it could be «embraced by pagans in the Roman Empire, by Christians in Byzantium and Western Europe, and Christians, Jews, and Muslims who lived in the Islamic Empire and wrote in Syriac, Arabic, Persian, and Hebrew.»

What must the case really be, so far as we today can grasp it, if people who thought and wrote and naturally accepted such and such ideas put things in the way in which they did put them?

Hence what is required is just what Leonard Hodgson has so often, and rightly, demanded: we must ask ourselves what the case really is, so far as we can grasp it today, if people who thought and wrote like that, phrased it in the way they did.

«The verdict in the highly publicized case appeared to satisfy no one, with the artistic community seeing it as an infringement on free speech, and Russian Orthodox believers, who had hoped for a prison sentence, saying the fines were too lenient,» the Moscow Times wrote July 13.

Thakur's appointment was «like a beacon of hope for those living in fear,» wrote Anto Akkara, who wrote a book about the Kandhamal events and started a petition protesting the apparent discrepancies and injustices in the case against the seven Christians who were found guilty of Saraswati's murder.

No one with the least comprehension of legal reasoning who has followed the actual jurisprudential arguments in the relevant cases could have written such lines.

«I wrote to you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people — not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral... In that case you would have to leave this world... what business is it of mine to judge those outside the Church?

I have written in this space about «Grasping for Gold» (November 1998), especially in the case of lawyers exploiting the Holocaust, and have commended Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League and others who protest the unseemliness of those who play the guilt game for their own enrichment, with little or no benefit to those who suffered the crimes for which restitution is demanded.

They also wrote that the resettlement program «is already extremely thorough» and that most of those being resettled «are family reunification cases,» meaning they are coming to be with family members who are already living in the country.

In response to our reader's objection, Mr. Solomon writes: «While I would not wish to oversimplify the case, and though I recognize that there are many liberal Catholic thinkers who are tolerant on this subject, the Catholic Church as an institution remains singularly and aggressively antagonistic on the subject of euthanasia, and does more than any other organization in the world to stand in the way of death with dignity.»

In case one assumes that all the many parsons here and in foreign lands who deliver and write sermons are believing Christians, how can it be explained that one never hears or reads a prayer which in our time especially is so pertinent: «God in heaven, I thank Thee that Thou hast not required it of man that he should comprehend Christianity; for if that were required, I should be of all men the most miserable.

Here once more, we find a passage from a Protestant who has long been taken to be the very antithesis of the liberal Protestant (and from the book that was written to be the death knell of liberal Protestantism), providing the same theological monism and skeptical epistemology that Milton first adumbrated and which led, at least in Milton's case, to the very liberal attitudes he had once so actively deplored.