If you look at the bigger picture — which is, what are we going to do on
the whole about fossil fuels and reducing and eliminating eventually our dependence on them?
Not exact matches
This relates to the
whole area of development for people talking
about biofuels, which is this idea of trying to develop replacements for the conventional sorts of
fossil fuels that we have to at least — if we are going to be burning some sort of hydrocarbons of some kind — to try to get them [so] that they are being derived from a different source, and potentially or ideally, ones that would actually burn without delivering as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere too; that's great if you can get that.
«As a
whole, still in 2030 [under the 450 - ppm scenario] dependency on
fossil fuels is
about 67 percent,» Tanaka says.
Naked Gun 2 1/2, which is a perversely, though funny, movie really
about environmental regulation; and it's a Leslie Nielsen movie, and he is a cop who is basically been called upon to protect, in a fictional Bush administration, the president has decided we're going to have a
whole new
fuel system which isn't going to be nuclear or kind of
fossil fuels, coal and oil — it is going to be based on alternatives.
As for your arguments
about how we have built our society on
fossil fuel based energy: Well, that is the
whole point.
# 10: the Globe and Mail (a major Canadian paper) has been running a
whole series of rah - rah stories
about fossil fuels in the past few weeks.
This
whole discussion
about burning
fossil fuels, cap and trade, the EPA attempt to regulate carbon emissions and the current actions of Congress to stop EPA is ALL rooted and based in the Greenhouse Theory.
If the tariff I'm suggesting helps to get some thinking going
about fossil fuel addiction, then it may be useful in that manner as well and not just in making our farmers
whole.
He's talking
about the
whole range of
fossil fuels — gas, oil, and coal, in both conventional and unconventional forms.
The usual activists like Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth remind us that the
whole thing is just another hand out for
fossil fuels and it doesn't mention anything
about deep enough carbon emission reductions.
Of course, this is bad because natural gas is still a
fossil fuel that produces greenhouse gases, and the new natural gas discoveries require fracking, which brings a
whole other bunch of issues and uncertainties
about the environmental impact.