I guess that is sort of what bugs a lot of people about
the whole charter school movement in general though.
It seems to me that
the whole charter school movement, at which KIPP is at the forefront, has benefited the small percent of students who make it through the KIPP program — they have a lot of attrition — and also benefits «the adults» like the teachers and the administrators there, but that benefit has come at a much much larger cost, the destruction of neighborhood schools and displacement of unwanted students.
Not exact matches
Following that, I would love to work as program director or project manager in one of the districts,
charter management organizations, or nonprofits working at the forefront of the
movement to redesign
schools or transform learning through
whole - district reform.
We could spend an entire EdNext volume arguing over the CREDO results alone, but I think some things are clear: one, nationally, low - income kids gain faster in
charters than in district
schools; two, many of CREDO's state and city - specific studies show very strong comparative gains for low - income
charter students; and three, the
movement as a
whole has made significant progress by doing exactly what the model calls for and closing low - performing
schools.
The major advocacy group for public
charter schools is concerned that failing online
charter schools may be hurting the credibility of the
movement as a
whole.
That was 1996, about five years in to the
movement and there wasn't a
whole lot of attention being paid to
charter schools then.
«For me... that is the problem with the
movement of
charter schools is that it's about fighting and dividing, not collaborating and strengthening public
schools as a
whole entity,» Nelson said.
So, overall, I don't think there is a theoretical argument against
charter schools as a
whole, but there is one about the conception of them in the
charter school movement.