Not exact matches
So it all seems plausible that
whole grain intake does indeed offer direct benefits; however, only results from randomized controlled
intervention studies can provide the evidence
of cause and
effect.
The bottom line, however, is that the ECO-C
Intervention as a
whole tends to have larger
effects than any
of its parts.
Hattie admits that «it would be possible to have a
whole book on the
effects of various
interventions for students with learning disabilities» (Hattie 2009, 217) and refers to a meta - study
of Swanson, Hoskyn and Lee (1999).
Existing SNHV trials show relatively modest
effects (
effect sizes
of 0.2 — 0.4 SDs) for outcomes such as child mental health and behaviour, and cognitive and language development, from infancy to mid - childhood.19 While
effect sizes
of 0.25 — 0.3 SDs can be meaningful and impactful at the
whole of population level, 59 targeted public health
interventions such as SNHV include a cost and intensity such that larger
effects in the short - to - medium term might be necessary to justify implementation at a population level.
Four a priori analyses were undertaken comparing outcomes for the hypothesised subgroups using 2 × 2 factorial ANOVA to assess main (
intervention vs comparison group)
effects and interaction (
intervention by subgroup
effects for mothers who were Australian - born vs overseas - born, first - time vs multiparous, had one vs multiple risk factors, and scored EDS ≥ 10 (antenatal psychosocial distress) vs EDS < 10), while maintaining the power
of the
whole sample.
In Denver, low - resource families who received home visiting showed modest benefits in children's language and cognitive development.102 In Elmira, only the
intervention children whose mothers smoked cigarettes before the experiment experienced cognitive benefits.103 In Memphis, children
of mothers with low psychological resources104 in the
intervention group had higher grades and achievement test scores at age nine than their counterparts in the control group.105 Early Head Start also identified small, positive
effects on children's cognitive abilities, though the change was for the program as a
whole and not specific to home - visited families.106 Similarly, IHDP identified large cognitive
effects at twenty - four and thirty - six months, but not at twelve months, so the
effects can not be attributed solely to home - visiting services.107
The
effect of CfC on joblessness was related to the
intervention as a
whole, rather than a site - specific outcome.
The new study is based on a study
of 82 different
interventions involving more than 97,000 students from kindergarten to high school, where the
effects were assessed at least six months and up to 18 years after the programs ended, it adds further fuel to the argument for teaching the
whole child and supporting out students in all their growth needs.