Of course, the internet still has all of the original documents, press releases, privacy policies, and public statements issued by Daybreak, Columbus Nova, and then - President John Smedley back in 2015 and since then, all of which made abundantly clear that Columbus Nova had acquired the whole company, as a company, and that Epstein was not the sole owne
Of course, the internet still has all
of the original documents, press releases, privacy policies, and public statements issued by Daybreak, Columbus Nova, and then - President John Smedley back in 2015 and since then, all of which made abundantly clear that Columbus Nova had acquired the whole company, as a company, and that Epstein was not the sole owne
of the original documents, press releases,
privacy policies, and public statements
issued by Daybreak, Columbus Nova, and then - President John Smedley back in 2015 and since then, all
of which made abundantly clear that Columbus Nova had acquired the whole company, as a company, and that Epstein was not the sole owne
of which made abundantly clear that Columbus Nova had acquired the
whole company, as a company, and that Epstein was not the sole owner.
Becoming ever more pertinent in our daily lives, GCs have a
whole range
of new and evolving
issues relating to
privacy and data that can mean very real consequences
of litigation, reputation and trust loss.
Because, with all due respect to Côté J's argument that the
issue in this case relates to a matter
of general importance to the legal system as a
whole (solicitor - client privilege), it is hard to accept the characterization
of this decision as about solicitor - client privilege, rather than about the interpretation
of the
Privacy Commissioner's home statute.