And the global mean temperature is indeed a function of the temperature over
the whole planetary surface.
Not exact matches
To me this appears the most satisfactory interpretation of the present state of Life on the
surface of the earth; despite a regrettable recrudescence of racialism and nationalism which, impressive though it may be, and disastrous in its effect upon our private post-war lives, seems to have no scientific importance in the overall process: for the reason that any human tendency to fragmentation, regardless of its extent and origin, is clearly of an order of magnitude inferior to the
planetary forces (geographic, demographic, economic and psychic) whose constantly and naturally growing pressure must sooner or later compel us willy - nilly to unite in some form of human
whole organized on the basis of human solidarity.
ABM: The
whole point about the greenhouse gases in a
planetary atmosphere is that they absorb the infrared radiation emitted by the
surface, and so Kirchhoff's law does not apply.
But we have known for 2
whole centuries the effect of GHG on
planetary atmospheres and
surfaces, pretty well proven 200 years ago.
The
whole concept of direct radiation supposedly heating the
surface to observed temperatures is wrong and a totally different paradigm involving entropy maximization and thermodynamics at the molecular level is now known to be what explains
planetary surface temperatures being higher than what can be explained with radiation.
I've tried to make it clear in my previous post that the imbalance of the
whole planet is eventually communicated to the
surface, and proper considerations of the
surface temperature can not be determined without invoking satisfaction of the
planetary energy budget (and in fact you can't even complete the discussion of the
surface budget without talking about the primary of TOA fluxes).