Sentences with phrase «whole point of the comment»

That was the whole point of my comment, «the same word can have different meanings to different people.»

Not exact matches

I'm also going to add this; in earlier comments you raised some legitimate points for discussion about how the British Mandate was apportioned, which is a huge part of the whole quagmire and the legality of it all is a huge, tangled, convoluted mess.

The meaning of the Cross, however, and its relation to the Resurrection, are discussed more fully in Professor MacKinnon's comments, and, since my reaction to his Meditation as a whole is one of agreement and gratitude, I now turn to two particularly interesting points which he brings forward in his «interpretation».

Your comments are kind of funny... my whole point is that I am not the only person who knows the truth about how women are treated in the faith community — ask thousands of people and you will find out.

I know the idea of a 25 goal a season striker is exciting to most of us, but I also suggested this point in the comments of another article that we have a whole bunch of goal sources.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

I just wanted to know what the point of picking out the breech statistics was to compare since it's personally important to me, that whole comment stood out and I realized it didn't make sense.

... it is for the whole nation», the lawmaker pointed out when commenting on the party's vigilante group Invincible Forces threats to lock up offices of state institutions

In the comments to Carl's article Anthony Barnett of openDemocracy rebuffs Carl's description of the flag, contending that the «whole point of the Union jack is that it is NOT a national flag».

The whole strategy of the Conservative leadership seems to be to go for an even more image based version of the one that Tony Blair used in 1997, the pledge by Labour in the 1990s followed a situation in which the whole economic strategy of the then Conservative government had fallen apart to the point where things that had happened by accident were being described as policy and Kenneth Clarke commented that he went into a cabinet meeting in a situation in which the government no longer had an economic policy.

I have read every single comment and some of them were absolutely wonderful because they were honest, insightful and you have opened up / got engaged in the discussion which was the point of the whole post.

I guess the «should have more substance» comment could be directed toward the movie as a whole, as important plot points feel glossed over in favor of the sexier material.

For example, during a whole class discussion, students should be expected to bounce ideas off of their peers» comments, paraphrase and extend the conversation, and, through inquiry, sharpen and deepen the points being raised — all without the teacher serving as the intermediary.

Thank you for standing up for our dying grammar conventions, but I would have to argue that helpful advice like this — which is only meant to make the article better and to maintain the integrity of the piece and of the site as a whole — might be better shared in a private email, rather than pointing it out in the comments» section.

Tayar's last comment raises an interesting point: None of the analysts I spoke with think Android as a whole is in danger of dying, as the phone platform remains quite strong.

Comments that make a whole bunch of unrelated points will only have the first point posted in the main thread.

The whole point of my original comment directed to no one in particular was to get lay people to think in more in terms of «thermal mass and inertia» and all the means of thermal transfer, rather than relying upon simplistic radiative vector algebra.

So as Nick Stokes points out (in a comment below), we can draw a line around the whole climate system, including the emission of radiation by the sun (see example 4 just below).

Just as I stated a few comments earlier with BaustinB, the WHOLE point of driving hybrid and alternative vehicles is to reduce pollution in addition to less consumption of fuel whether it be petroleum or electricity.

This was the whole point of the initial arguments in my comment - I was putting clear blue water between the bias adjustment stage and the weighting stage so that we could see how the weighting leveraged the already upwardly adjusted buoy data in each 2 ° x 2 ° monthly bin by 6.8.

Just to add to that, they have rules about language and the like, those «rules» only apply to one side of the debate, a whole range of sycophants appear to be able to post denigrating comments they wish as long as they slavishly show their devotion to the current blog talking points.

This comment, SMR, was mainly about the method — which if you look at the graphs which benchmark the method against synthetic proxy * data (which is different from the pseudoproxy data generated in MW) you see that the MW methods consistently overestimate MWP warmth when they are run against a dataset where the answer is known (this is the whole point of synthetic proxies).

Other comments from him indicate that his view of the whole question revolves almost entirely around the «physics of the greenhouse effect» and very little from historic reconstructions — apart from the end points as per the above.

So the whole exercise is, unfortunately, do your country and the world a huge disservice, particularly when, as DM points out, every denialist crank and roboblogger on the planet is likely to pile on to the comment section leading to an apparent further skewing of the debate toward the dangerously absurd.

The whole bloody point of my first comment was to say that Dana's post tries to explain just that and that Bob's reaction to Dana is being very selective!

This of course was complete rubbish, since the whole point of trick - or - treating is to be out after dark (and not just to have the cover of darkness for one's tricks...)(For more comment on popular delusions about Hallowe'en risks, see Bruce Schneier's blog.)

«[Bitcoin Unlimited] and [Bitcoin] Classic both claim to support the same consensus rules (BIP109), but are diverged and will not share the same testnet anymore — the whole point of a consensus system is to come to consensus and [Bitcoin Unlimited] and [Bitcoin] Classic will reliably fail to do so on testnet,» commented Maxwell.

While all four aspects of product design should be among the selling points of the successor to the G6 flagship, the executive's comments suggested that revamped philosophy won't just reflect on the company's next ultra-premium device but its future portfolio as a whole.