Not exact matches
This smaller unit (vs. 16) toward which the
whole passage is
pointed 7 is the reproduction — insofar as such is capable
of reproduction —
of the word received in prophetic concentration / ecstasy.
The
whole of this
passage of Isaiah was
of great importance to Christians as
pointing to the fact that the paradoxical death
of the Messiah was part
of God's plan, and later on this particular verse may have influenced the development
of the detailed story
of Nicodemus and the burial
of Jesus.
Various procedures would have been used by him in order to revise his text, the most important being the insertion, at various places in the original manuscript,
of passages expressing his new vision, at times a few lines, at times even
whole sections, with the intention
of leading his eventual readers to interpret the
whole context in the light
of the
point of view
of the inserted materials.3 Ford proposes that Whitehead did modify his original manuscript accordingly a number
of times before its publication in 1929, with the result that the final version
of Process and Reality is actually the outcome
of the superposition
of texts from successive redactional strata over the original stratum made by the manuscript
of the summer
of l927.4
The modern way
of expressing the
point is to require that interpretation be canonical, each
passage being interpreted kerygmatically and normatively as part
of the
whole body
of God's revealed instruction.
In Luke 7:44 - 48, Jesus turns to the woman and makes the
point of this
whole passage very clear.
My
point is that in order to maintain the subordination
of women Christians have to make a
whole lot
of stuff up for themselves and explain away a lot
of scripture that contradicts the
passages they are using to prop up their belief that women's roles are limited.
I once heard Brueggemann speak on this Gospel
passage,
pointing out that in it Jesus reenacts the
whole history
of Israel.