Sentences with phrase «whole purpose of rule»

[25] That, in my view, defeats the whole purpose of Rule 12?

Not exact matches

And using offshore accounts or holding companys aren't particularly effective methods for shielding income for tax purposes (since offshore accounts are subject to a whole whack of anti-avoidance rules and holding companys are typically subject to more or less the same tax rate as people in the top marginal tax bracket - the Tax Act has tightened up a lot since the 1960s so there really aren't that many «loopholes»).

It will take some experimenting but a general rule of thumb is 1 cup of all purpose flour = 3/4 cup whole wheat flour.

I was on tinder for a couple of days earlier this year and then quickly unsubscribed when I realised my «swipe - right rules» where pretty exclusive and defeated the whole purpose anyway.

Certain techniques were flagged up «no hands rule; use of mini-white boards, Kagan, learning environments that are supporting; bolstering self - esteem; positivity; curiosity; creativity; identify students to lead plenary at end of lesson at the beginning; Get class blogging — quadblogging; tallies for whole class rewards; encouraging independent learning; wait time when questioning; talk about their thinking and reasoning; conversational learning; talk with learning partners before answering any questions; pair and share; Glazer learning model structure for lesson delivery — a good mix of interaction and independent work; offering choice to pupils; cross class working; allowing time to play; list / describe / explain / evaluate; new audiences beyond the school; project based learning and philosopy; swapping age - groups; cross-curricular working; read to them every day; invite varied guests in; learning by discovery using pupils» interests; stand back and watch with purpose.

And the whole purpose of the new rules as far as I can tell is just to cool the market off.

The purpose of this trading rule is to force us to wait until the market as a whole is showing signs of positive momentum before re-committing funds.

Accordingly, one is not compelled to conclude that interest expenses must be recoverable because the purpose of the rule is to make a successful party whole.

Last month, the online community (that's pretty much the whole world, folks) was stunned by a ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union («EU COJ»), which held individuals had a right to request that Google remove data «that appear to be inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive in relation to the purposes for which they were processed and in the light of the time that has elapsed.»

In such situations, the court may be forced to rule in favor of one party not because theirs is seen as the better option but for the purpose of bringing the whole matter to rest.

Instead, in the final rule, we require covered entities that create protected health information for the purpose, in whole or in part, of research that includes treatment of individuals to include additional elements in authorizations they request for the use or disclosure of that protected health information.

I so would like to see the independent contracts professionals will use, being drawn up for the purpose of avoiding responsibilities associated with buying and selling property, and can not help but wonder who will monitor the issues that are bound to be associated — and what is to become of the industry when agents get paid for letting the public come into «the club,» that has rules and regulations that then likely will mean nothing as the whole.