Most of the time, the citations are restricted to
those whose arguments she is presenting.
Not exact matches
Now it
is central to the whole point of David Novak's
argument that this entire strategy
is founded on a most fundamental error,
whose formulation we must cite in full, adding italics to highlight its centrality: «Theologically, the error here
is that revelation
is essentially reduced to the supreme awareness of an order already
present in creation.»
The source for both Hartshorne and Weiss's opinions on this point
is Charles Peirce,
whose essay, «The Doctrine of Necessity Examined,»
presents a more dialectical
argument than that of either of his students for why people might mistakenly believe in determinism (7: pars.
But what I detect in it
is the work of someone who
was never all that interested in investigating the
arguments on either side of the same - sex marriage debate;
whose scant interest in it has now
been fully exhausted, both intellectually and morally; and
whose present conclusions hover in mid-air without anything to support them other than a wistful regret that he has lost a hoedown partner in a gay man who has come fairly unglued over the issue.
The debate
was hosted by Intelligence Squared US, a non-profit
whose mission
is to host debates that give both sides a chance to
present their
arguments so people can decide for themselves how they feel about a particular issue, whether it
's dating, politics, the effects of technology, or any number of challenges we face today.
For years people had
been letting their dogs run free in the meadow to the west of the elementary school without attracting much notice; but once an authorized off - leash «dog park»
was proposed and a petition
presented to the Littlefield Board of Aldermen, fierce
arguments erupted over
whose rights to the park should
be upheld, and the town broke into factions: those who loved dogs and those who did not, at least not in the park.
Together, they
present an
argument for Báez as one of our most gifted and relevant young artists working today, one
whose exquisite works - on - paper
are set apart by their devotion to poetry and politics, abstraction and narrative, history and fantasy in equal measure.
Unlike those
whose books you reviewed, he
is actually a serious scholar, though his
arguments are more nuanced and harder to
present in headlines and soundbites.
It means review by other scientists,
whose interest
is in truth, facts, and knowledge, and they gain stature in their own reputation by pointing out weaknesses in the
arguments and data
presented in the original work.
We
are extremely proud this year to
be presenting our Great Friend of Justice award to Mary L. Bonauto, the civil rights lawyer
whose powerful
arguments and long - term legal strategies have led to historic strides in achieving marriage equality for same - sex couples across the United States.
The Supreme Court rejected the
arguments put forward by
Ms Michael's family that the police owe a duty of care in negligence where: (i) they
are aware or ought reasonably to
be aware of a threat to the life or physical safety of an identifiable person, or member of an identifiable small group («Interveners» Liability Principle»); or alternatively, (ii) a member of the public gives the police apparently credible evidence that a third party,
whose identity and whereabouts
are known,
presents a specific and imminent threat to his life or physical safety («Lord Bingham's Liability Principle»).
We
are extremely proud this year to
be presenting our Great Friend of Justice award to Mary L. Bonauto, the civil rights lawyer
whose powerful
arguments and long - term legal strategies have led to historic strides in -LSB-...]