The fact of freedom makes the more necessary the sharing of life with that company of people
whose faith and moral conviction are necessary to each individual's moral sanity.
Not exact matches
In nearly every nation
whose cultural heritage,
moral and legal systems developed from this western, Christian tradition, he is free to insult people of
faith as much as he wishes.
@RUReal, «In nearly every nation
whose cultural heritage,
moral and legal systems developed from this western, Christian tradition, he is free to insult people of
faith as much as he wishes.»
In their historical context, however, the issues, in response to which the Pauline formula was forged, no longer existed: because Christianity was well on the way to becoming a gentile religion, separate from Judaism, the question of the salutary benefit of
faith in Christ, which earlier had arisen among Christians who did not observe the cultic requirements of Jewish law,
and in that sense were without «works of the law, arose now among Christians
whose lives exhibited
moral laxity, which could be understood in terms of popular
moral philosophy.
Granted that
faith does indeed imply justice in the generally
moral sense of right action that gives each his or her due, what this does
and does not imply depends upon some understanding of what is due to those
whose interests are affected by our action
and of what we are able to do to realize these interests.
As the great Italian critic Croce remarks, he had at once the scientific interest in history
and human life of the encyclopedists, the irony of Voltaire,
and the
faith in Christian
morals of the Catholic reaction of the early nineteenth century - the reaction
whose romantic exaggeration one can see in Chateaubriand Spirit of Christianity.