Karl Barth, who changed the direction of twentieth century theology with his recognition of the bankruptcy of nineteenth century liberalism, nevertheless did not ignore the theological discussion of
those whose understanding of the faith he judged to be inadequate.
It is this shift in how truth is perceived and appropriated that is one of the factors creating resistance to electronic culture by theologians and clergy,
whose understanding of faith has been strongly shaped by the characteristics and requirements of print culture in which they were educated and by virtue of which they hold status and power.
Not exact matches
@Richard — I came across this
understanding of «
faith» from the writings
of a Catholic priest
whose job it was to
understand and explain Christian theology.
The religious
whose doctrines rely strictly on a literal interpretation are most at risk
of losing their
faith through education and
understanding the history
of the bible.
Of that number, 90 % — 1.8 billion — belong to sects whose official p [osition is that there is no problem with a faith in the Christian version of a god, and an understanding that evolution is a fac
Of that number, 90 % — 1.8 billion — belong to sects
whose official p [osition is that there is no problem with a
faith in the Christian version
of a god, and an understanding that evolution is a fac
of a god, and an
understanding that evolution is a fact.
Of that number, 90 % — 1.8 billion — belong to sects whose position is that there is no problem with a faith in the Christian version of a god and an understanding that evolution is a fac
Of that number, 90 % — 1.8 billion — belong to sects
whose position is that there is no problem with a
faith in the Christian version
of a god and an understanding that evolution is a fac
of a god and an
understanding that evolution is a fact.
Of that number, 1.8 billion (90 %) belong to sects whose position is that there is no problem with a faith in your version of a god, and an understanding that evolution is a fac
Of that number, 1.8 billion (90 %) belong to sects
whose position is that there is no problem with a
faith in your version
of a god, and an understanding that evolution is a fac
of a god, and an
understanding that evolution is a fact.
The word «evangelical» distinguishes that group in Christendom
whose dedication to the gospel is expressed in a personal
faith in Christ as Lord and
whose understanding of the gospel is defined solely by Scripture, the written Word
of God.
I need more than the resources
of Bible, theological tradition, and my own commitments if I am to
understand my
faith and the world in which it is set; I also need the ethical insights
of my secular colleagues, the political and psychological analyses
of my friends and foes, and the prophetic jab
of nonchurchmen
whose degree
of commitment so often puts my own to shame.20
«1 What theologians have to show if they want to be heard is the biblical view that the world is unintelligible apart from Christ.2 The theological hang - up on the problem
of the Jesus
of history and the Christ
of faith is irrelevant for the ordinary man
whose goal is the
understanding of the message
of Christ and which task is theology's very purpose.
Is the creation
of the soul
of man at the beginning
of the history
of humanity and at the beginning
of the individual life
of each particular person, as this is
understood by traditional Christian philosophy and the Church's magisterium (as a truth
of faith), an exceptional, extraordinary occurrence
whose special ontological features contradict everything that is otherwise
understood regarding the relation
of the first cause to second causes?
However, Rice also notes that there was, and always has been, another side both to Calvin and the Reformed tradition — a side that was less confident in the intellect's ability to answer all questions — a side that could acknowledge ambiguity and be open to mystery at the heart
of the
faith — and that
understood God to be immanent as well as transcendent, and one
whose «dependability came not from being unchanging, but from being loving.»
In their historical context, however, the issues, in response to which the Pauline formula was forged, no longer existed: because Christianity was well on the way to becoming a gentile religion, separate from Judaism, the question
of the salutary benefit
of faith in Christ, which earlier had arisen among Christians who did not observe the cultic requirements
of Jewish law, and in that sense were without «works
of the law, arose now among Christians
whose lives exhibited moral laxity, which could be
understood in terms
of popular moral philosophy.
Granted that
faith does indeed imply justice in the generally moral sense
of right action that gives each his or her due, what this does and does not imply depends upon some
understanding of what is due to those
whose interests are affected by our action and
of what we are able to do to realize these interests.
The ultimate goal
of our study
of Exodus is the deeper
understanding of and commitment to our
faith in him
whose love daily brings us again out
of Egypt, out
of bondage, out
of all our besetting slaveries into the land
of forgiveness, renewal, redemption, and love.
The first key point to
understand is the difference between the Prime Minister's roles as head
of the Cabinet, who wields executive power via the confidence
of the House
of Commons, and as Tory leader,
whose authority rests on the
faith colleagues have in you as a general election winner.
Create your own profile and begin the process
of meeting a potential mate
whose understanding of your background,
faith, and values is complete.