Sentences with phrase «why labour needs»

But that's why Labour needs to be bigger in our appeal, bolder in our ambitions and brighter about the future.

That's why Labour needs to offer hope: a living wage, for instance; letting councils build Britain out of its housing crisis; an industrial strategy to create the renewable energy jobs of the future; turning the bailed - out banks into accountable public investment banks; tax justice; and public ownership of our key utilities.

Agreed — which is why Labour needs a coherent alternative to Tory cuts which, after all, has sucked growth out of the economy.

That's why Labour need to get a convincing economic set of policies (and also, as Ed Miliband keeps suggesting, why they need to concentrate their fire on the Conservatives not the Lib Dems).

Not exact matches

The temporary foreign workers issue is just another example of why Canada needs to keep better labour market data.

Christ in us the HOPE of Glory in Jesus name: I am His workmanship for His Glory: God is nothing like us, that is why Paul said we need to have Christ formed in us: Little Children; I labour in birth again until Christ be formed in you: Read what I have up on Zender's site and if you still don't understand it, that means it was not meant for you to understand: Thank - you Gary; In Jesus Name Alexandria:

«No doubt there is an intriguing tale as to why this has been revealed publicly now» The smart money says Labour have known about this for months and have been waiting for the right moment i.e. when they're in serious trouble and need to put the heat on someone else.

Both Cameron and Clegg need to remind and reinforce to the Conservatives and the Lib Dems why they are in coalition, and the new Labour leader needs to reassure a movement that they can supply hope, comfort and electoral credibility.

The Nigeria Labour Congress National Executive Council is also meeting tomorrow and we have invitation to also attend the meeting and that is why today we have taken our position and there is no doubt that we are also going to fight for that reversal and we are not stopping on just reversal to N86.50 k, we are also going to further our struggle against the deregulation policy, against the privatization policy and the need for a political alternative and that is where we are going.

«What Nick will need to do as deputy prime minister is to show what a difference the Liberal Democrats have made and why a majority for either Conservatives or Labour at the election would be a disaster,» blog Lib Dem Voice quoted him as saying.

(And as James says, if what was on the table was Labour becoming a liberal party, then why would they need us?)

Labour need to ask themselves why it is that they don't do as well in England as they do in Wales and Scotland.

I think that it will not be long until Britain remembers why it needs a Labour party, if only we can remember why it needs a Labour party.

Talking to a Brick Wall: How New Labour Stopped Listening to the Voter and Why We Need a New Politics is out now, published by Biteback, # 17.99

«Labour supporters need to use their noddle and ask themselves why Cameron is fighting so hard for a No vote.

But if Labour emerges with 170 seats, the left would need Lewis and Maskell to pull through - plus one more, which is why Corbyn's insiders are so desperate to secure safe seats for allies like Katy Clark.

The Labour leader must strengthen his team, «focus» his messages and bring in different people who will remind voters why they need a Labour government, he said.

But if they already believe that, why does Labour need to remind them?

If anyone needs an example of why Labour can't be trusted with the interests of British people, this is it.

I think the main task for labour is to convince people of the economic case for their plans to increase spending and why austerity measures need to be less and how this relates to the national debt.

Why does the need for extra transparency only apply to Trade Unions and their relationship with Labour?

One senior Labour source told PoliticsHome that the research showed why Jeremy Corbyn - accused by many within the party of a lacklustre attempt to persuade voters to back Remain last week - needed to be replaced.

That is why we need to push labour back into where it belongs, the land of socialism.

If Labour is to revitalise itself in opposition, it needs to look at why it lost.

Labour needs to learn why there has been large swings to the Tories in certain areas.

Elsewhere in the interview, Streeting provides his take on why Labour lost the last election and says the party now needs to pick a leader who is «thinking about how they win the country» not just Labour supporters.

«A one - off windfall tax on oil profits would be a fair, popular redistribution of wealth and a reminder of why a Labour government protects those in need.»

That's why the last Labour government put funding in place so that anyone who needs basic skills training could get it.

It will need to come from Labour leaders explaining precisely why they disagree with Corbyn.

More complicatedly cooperating parties will need to be clear where their differences lie and to agree with each other what these are so that voters have a good handle on why to vote Labour rather than Green or Plaid or vice versa.

Addressing a small group of observers in Westminster, the former foreign secretary gave a frank assessment of why Labour lost the election, saying the party needs to become a «movement» again.

Labour needs to explain why it has gone back on its word.

The most pressing question to come out of this whole Peter Hain business is that of why anyone needs to know who funded a campaign for Deputy Leader of the Labour Party.

Labour needs to understand and articulate the hazards of the Tories» approach to decentralisation and respond with our own alternative — one that understands why our current democratic settlement emerged in the first place.

22 OO wrote: As ever Nick you show why you need to be sacked - complacent, lazy & to cosy with the new Labour ruling elite.

But why do we even need a Labour left?

He added: «We need a government that lasts which is why we believe, in the light of the state of talks with the Conservative Party, the only responsible thing to do is to open discussions with the Labour Party to secure a stable partnership agreement.

Why, one wonders, should they need one, with a perfectly serviceable app from Labour freely available?

Sir Michael Spicer (Con) asks why Britain needs a Labour government now that fiscal responsibility is back in vogue.

Thank you for an excellent article which clearly demonstrates not only some of the reasons labour lost so badly in 2010 & again last month, but equally shows why we urgently need reform and a change of agenda in British politics.

The Tory tax cut plan does not need to be as big as Labour's (although there is no reason why it couldn't be larger if we adopted a sufficiently hawkish approach to spending) but it's vital that - in addition to existing pledges on a council tax freeze and VAT holiday - we join Barack Obama, John McCain, Nick Clegg and Gordon Brown in offering our own tax relief plan.

And, of course, why nuclear if coal, gas and oil are cheaper and therefore (because less in need of human labour) cleaner.

If the story was fabricated, argued the Crown, why did he add the detail of the defendant needing a shower after his manual labour job?