Sentences with phrase «why walcot»

can't see why Walcot starting ahead of Campbell!!!! I could even give a Chance to young Adelaide...

Sanogo is a prospect all fans should understand that how had can that be, his the 4th striker sanchez the 1st walcot the third the question is now who will be the second striker remember we only real need 3 strikes which is why walcot and sanchez as winger strikers makes the 4 strikes happy imaging if we only had 3 stikers all good un of the winger strikes of coz two of the wonnt be happy.

But why Walcot as ST when OG is bettet in the air and with our tiny mid field could use his presence?

Not exact matches

Gibbs hasn't got the confidence to pass the ball forward, he gets to pass back to often and is not good at defending Monreal is a class act so we need to add there Ramsey is not a wide player, why Wenger doesn't play his strongest first then make the 2subs in 65 min and Walcot should have started as Ramsey is better in Midfield.

I find it disgusting when Wenger get praised even in the face of inadequacy, Wenger lost to barcelona, not those players with his 2substitutions, why he opt for Walcot when he had Joel and d beasty Welbeck is still a mystery to me.

«Wenger is giving the striker the self confidence and belief that should help him to start banging more goals in himself» i highly doubt that makes one a goal scorer... otherwise why bring about this question after welbeck has been involved in two goals??? To me walcot is a better option because of his finishing, smart runs, game reading, delivering during big games, good final touch and making it easier for the right back since he keeps defenders in deep in their half therefore, no need for him to be defensive.

its not true, Walcot hasn't proved he can play there.if Walcots putting preconditionslike that b4 he signs then hes leaving.it just wont work, playing him upfront, but that wud explain why he keeps takin off Giroud an putting on Theo with 10 minutes to go.Wenger needs to man up an be honest with Theo, hes never going to be a centre forward

So why are things different with Walcot?

It amazes me why people always mention Theo Walcot when discussing players to be sold.

walcot is a good player for me.idk why is always in bench.

If wenger keeps favouring players it will cost us big time how and why does walcot get a start?

bellerin has been poor since December but walcot why he is ahead of iwobi is beyond me..

Why not sell all this injury prone players, like Walcot, per, jack.gibbs, even ox, we shouldn't be scared to let go in as much as we bring in better replacement!

This boils down to the question I am yet to find answer to: Why is Wenger not playing Walcot?

because no competition for spot, if you have two good players in one position, d one playing will b fully awaere that if he doesn't perform to expectation, there is another good guy waiting to topple him, hence d one playing is contious of DAT, then why allow contracts to linger on, get rid of unproductive players who ate on free salaries, walcot, iwobi, mattasarka, and buy players you can use, end carzola contract and channel d money elsewhere, too many leakages in d system, y waisting money for noting, all these is asene fault, he is the coach.

I was itching for walcot to replace Ramsey but now I know why wenger is playing ramsey on the flanks.

Walcot just like any other Arsenal lad has to show why he deserves to start matches.

i understand why wenger opted for gibbons instead because defending doesn't interest walcot..

Walcot is playing good, I'll tell you why.

well, alexis will be back and walcot will definetly be a starter (why give hm a hefty new contract to bench him)..

Why should Walcot leave??? He is worldclass!!!

Wenger is a dictator he never listens to anybody this is the reason why we have not won league trophy in 10 yrs, and we will never win it with players like Jack, Gibbs, walcot, Welbeck in the team overhyped british players ruining arsenal ie they all had injuries who did we miss

why I left out Giroud and poldosky is because of the following reasons it all depend on cambel, sanogo, sanchez and walcot seasons really weather we need to release and buy a strike or just release / that and buy a left winger strike or giroud and poldosky show they worth coz in france giroud looked the part a also thought and poldosky was an immediate solution to the loss of RVP.

we do business with southampton why not give them walcot plus some cash for fonte and long since they like selling their best players.

i would swap debuchy for bellerin if possible, honestly, i think walcott and bellerin will leave us weak defensively down the right, it might be ok for Sunderland by I understand why wenger did nt want walcot to start on the right with bellerin vs Man U — i think it would put us out of balance on the right, thats why coquelin moved in there when walcott came on.

Yes.I support the fact Giroud should stay.Perez should also be given a chance to play.On few occasions he played he proved himself either by scoring goals or giving assist.I don't know why no body is talking of buying Walcot.

There is absolutely no reason why Wilshere should start over Walcot.

Why can't Wenger just put Walcot on the right and Campbel on the left....

We knew walcot and ramsey were not going to be available for awhile, why didn't we re-enforce?