The bible also says you are product of insest (guess god didn't think that through when he only made two people to start with), jesus has multiple family lineages back to david and adam with little overlapping patriarchs (true, look it up), teaches being born is a sin (thats
why they baptize), and encourages the worship of a zombie via ritualistic cannibalism (jesus after the cross and the eucharist).
If water makes «no difference,»
why baptize?
This is what the Mormons teach and
why they baptize dead people by proxy in their temples.
If there had been no resurrection then
why baptize??? You would go under (symbolically death and burial) but never come up.
if you do not understand
why baptizing someone who was killed for being jewish by other christians is not only offensive but a sin then i am sure hell has a spot reserved for you.
It not so subtly describes how and
why the baptized got tossed from their synagogues in those early decades, and who would serve as a new community for them once they'd been cut loose from family and friends.
Not exact matches
Some may wonder
why it still is necessary if they were
baptized in other churches, then
why would they still need to be
baptized by the LDS church members through proxy.
In other words, he was saying: «If there is no resurrection,
why should we bother being
baptized?
Why the Mormons
baptizing for the dead should be offensive to anyone says bunches about the one who would take offense.
«Else
why would they
baptize the dead»?
Why don't you go
baptize Joseph Smith again!
Only I don't get
why they would
baptize Hitler and Stalin.
In the 21st century
why are we still «
baptizing» people?
«Else what shall they do which are
baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all,
why are they then
baptized for the dead».
Why be
baptized if only to die?
That's
why they tried to «
baptize» the late Simon Weisenthal.
Do you not know
why babies are
baptized in Catholic Churches?
why is it ok to
baptize babies who have had so say what so ever in to what religion they are being subjected..
If the Mormons do not believe this nonsense then
why would they
baptize the dead?
How can you NOT understand
why people (Jews) who were persecuted for their faith by Christians would NOT be offended by having their martyred icons «
baptized» by Christians in order to «save them?»
You cant
baptize a spirit, so this is
why there are temple baptisms by proxy.
That's
why the Late Roman Emperors got
baptized on their death beds.
it simply speaks to say
why are we that are dead if we do nt believe in Christ, be
baptized if the dead in Christ do not rise as he did.
I'm a mormon, and I can understand
why many would think
baptizing for the dead might seem kind of weird or unecessary - even ridiculous.
If these people don't believe in the mormon religion then
why do they care if someone proxy
baptizes their dead?
why are they then
baptized for the dead?
Can you now see
why, in an earlier day, the church always
baptized at Easter?
If the dead are not raised at all,
why are people
baptized on their behalf?
The problem with this view is that Paul asks,
Why are they
baptized for the dead?
It is fine to teach students how to
baptize a baby, but we are not accomplishing much unless we require them to think through
why a baby ought (or ought not) to be
baptized.
If 57 % of all so - called evangelical Christians believe that there are many ways to heaven, it is not difficult to understand
why so many of them reject the words of Jesus when He said «He who has believed and has been
baptized shall be saved..
This is
why Jesus Christ sent the Apostles out with His authority to preach and teach all that He had told the Apostles... to go out to all nations and to
Baptize them.
1st Corinth 15:29 (New Testiment)- «Else what shall they do do that are
baptized for the dead - if the dead rise not at all,
why are they then
baptized for the dead.»
He was
baptized so the Divine could set him apart — could call him by name and claim him as God's own, And that is
why we are
baptized.
Why then are they
baptized for the dead?
I belong to the church of Jesus Christ of latter day saints and this is
why we practice
baptizing a proxy (someone living) for dead ancestors.
And so that is
why He gets
baptized.
P.S. if you had really been committed to
baptizing your baby in the Faith,
why would you choose as Godparents people who have turned away from it?
He says to them, «Look, before I
baptize you,
why don't you do some actual repentance?
For I do not understand
why some of my Evangelical friends are never
baptized despite the fact that Christ says to be
baptized, if baptism was nothing or if it wasn't necessary then God would have not instructed people to
baptize.
• Do members understand
why a pastor would refuse to
baptize the babies of couples who do not participate in the life of the congregation even though the grandparents are members?
If this procedure is so precious to them,
why not obtain permission from the families whose relatives the Mormons wish to
baptize?
Why do they think it's acceptable to
baptize non-Mormons or anyone who is not a Mormon while they are living?
So when the news spread that a person had been
baptized, their family, friends, and neighbors would ask
why they had been
baptized, what their new identity was going to be, and how it would look in the future.
If baptism is not essential then
why not walk in a new life before being
baptized in water?
So they would have asked, «
Why did you get
baptized?»
There is no mystery as to
why Jesus was
baptized in the first place.
Of course I wondered
why they agreed to be
baptized in the first place if they did not believe.)