Sentences with phrase «why bettors»

Here is why bettors should believe in the Texans.

I'm not quite ready to trust them against a good team, but I certainly understand why bettors are risking a little on The Toffees for a big potential payout.

This last second shot helped the Warriors clinch a playoff berth, but more importantly it showed why bettors should always have access to multiple sportsbooks and always shop for the best line.

There are probably a handful of reasons why bettors aren't swayed by the Celtics» game 3 performance.

It's easy to see why bettors think the last game was a fluke.

It's easy to see why bettors would be tempted by this prospect, but it's fool's gold.

In fact, this game provides the perfect example of why bettors should always shop for the best line since many square books (like BetOnline, Bovada and Sportsbook.com) are offering Golden State -5.5, while sharper books (like CRIS and 5Dimes) are currently listing Cleveland +6.

It's also worth noting that «44» is the second most important key number for over / unders, which is why bettors should be sure to shop for the best line before placing a wager.

Earlier this week we explained why bettors should be wary of the trendy underdog, and created a new betting system that has gone 80 - 54 ATS (59.7 %) with +21.56 units won.

Perhaps that explains why bettors are taking the points and hammering the Tar Heels.

Prior to the start of the NCAA Tournament, we submitted a betting system to ESPN's Tournament Betting Guide which explained why bettors should be fading the so - called «trendy underdogs.»

It's easy to understand why bettors are avoiding Cleveland, especially given the performance of teams in this situation.

Based on the line movement in these games, it's easy to see why bettors have been able to extract value.

In one of our more popular articles, we explained why bettors should be wary of trendy underdogs.

This game provides the perfect example of why bettors should ideally have access to at least three sportsbooks: one sharp, one square and one reduced juice.

Last week my coworker Andrew Fine explained why bettors should be fading San Diego Padres starting pitcher Edwin Jackson due to his past struggles, high walk rate, and steam on their opponent — the Cincinnati Reds.

It's tough to say exactly why bettors have made their bets, but it appears as if there has been some sharp action on Minnesota given the line movement and betting percentages.

Considering the recent history between these two teams, it's easy to understand why bettors are so optimistic about New England.

LSU got pasted by Mississippi State in the opener and then lost a home game to Troy, so it makes some sense why bettors are still scared off from betting LSU.

Perhaps that explains why bettors were willing to take the points in Games 1 and 2.

They discuss the most profitable March Madness betting strategies, important criteria when handicapping college basketball games, how to exploit lines in smaller tournaments, the best time to place your wagers, and why bettors need to have realistic expectations when buying picks.

Perhaps this helps explain why bettors have been hammering the chalk at an alarming rate.

We often preach about why bettors should avoid parlays when there's normal juice associated, but when it comes to bigger moneylines in sports like soccer, it does make sense sometimes.

Not only do the Colts fit our much - discussed 80/20 betting rule, they also fit one of our ESPN betting systems which explains why bettors should fade teams coming off a double - digit ATS win at home.

It's hardly difficult to understand why bettors are flocking towards Penn State in this matchup.

During the webinar, Dan highlighted five reasons why bettors should consider Jacksonville in this week's Thursday Night Football matchup:

Not exact matches

Perhaps that massive upset explains why casual bettors are wary about backing the Hawkeyes.

We have previously discussed why MLB bettors should follow the Pinnacle moneyline steam move, but it's also true for NBA spread bettors.

I have previously discussed why MLB bettors should follow the Pinnacle moneyline steam move, but it's also true for NHL bettors.

Existing subscribers have been enjoying our early season success, so if you're not yet a member why not try our Premium Pro free 7 - day trial and begin reaping the benefits of being a more informed sports bettor?

As you can see, over 30 % of games we analyzed finished with a 3 - point or 7 - point margin of victory, showing exactly why sharp bettors consider these to be «key numbers».

Vanderbilt hasn't exactly been kind to bettors, but Danny Donahue sees a reason why they may be a solid bet tonight vs. Tennessee.

We always encourage that bettors buy on bad news, and this game exemplifies why we hold that philosophy.

To illustrate this further, our Best Bet results from 2012 provide a great example of why diversification is so important for winning sports bettors.

After their opening game against Virginia Tech, Boise State's average margin of victory is 38.8 points per game which is why giving a lot of points hasn't scared away too many bettors.

Past research has conclusively proven that betting against the public will produce a positive return on investment, although many bettors are confused about why this is such a successful strategy.

For years, we've detailed why baseball is one of the most profitable sports for sharp bettors.

Add in the facts that the MLB season is so long and there are so many games every single day and it's no surprise why sharp bettors love baseball so much.

Now many bettors are likely to scoff at the idea of betting on the WNBA, and it's easy to see why.

Why do most sports bettors refuse to use it?

Why pay -110 vig when you can deal with a fellow sports bettor and get -103, +100, perhaps even +105??!! As sports bettors become more informed shoppers, an increasing number of players will migrate to the exchanges.

So why has the opposite been true for baseball bettors?

That's why I'm going to recommend that bettors go against the grain and take the home underdog.

Bettors love taking star players and major market teams, which explains why teams like the Dallas Cowboys, Los Angeles Lakers and New York Yankees are often shaded.

That helps explain why $ 100 / game bettors would have lost $ 4,517 fading the public during the first two rounds of the NBA Playoffs, while those same bettors would have earned $ 2,162 fading the public in the final two rounds.

Most uneducated or «square» bettors tend to overvalue the league's elite which is why there's typically value fading teams atop the standings.

Clearly bettors are excited to back the Bears without Jay Cutler behind center, and it's easy to see why.

While bettors may be familiar with the major moves made by Boston, some may be curious about why oddsmakers are expecting significant growth from those other two rosters.

Square bettors love rooting for high - scoring games, which is why the under has historically provided contrarian value.

Instead, bettors must first determine why the line moved and pinpoint where the value lies with the new number.