Sentences with phrase «why big banks»

This is the reason why big banks and other financial players are flocking to the Ripple platform.

In this report, we take a closer look at how non-bank fintech apps are growing in the U.S., and why big banks are trying to take back the user base currently occupied by their fintech competitors.

Do you wonder why big banks, mutual fund companies and investment dealers don't want you to know about them?

Not exact matches

That's a big reason why Bank of America grew profits nearly 13 % last year even while sales were flat.

Frank brought an understanding of the big banks» perspective: Here's why they construct these accounts this way in the first place.

Last year, the central bank sounded an alarm, ranking the expansion of personal credit as the biggest threat to the economy, which is why everyone was shocked when Poloz suddenly cut interest rates in January.

«There is fantastic quality of living in the Nordic areas, there are many parameters stacking up to why you want to work, so we are very competitive,» said Christian Clausen, chief executive of Nordea, the region's biggest bank.

The other reason why Yellen will have to give big banks a whole lot of attention is that there seems to be new momentum in Washington to add new and deeper fixes.

Having said all this, it's important to bear in mind that the big bank stocks have the habit of declining when they report earnings, and this is another reason why I'll be watching them so closely this week.

As The Washington Post's Ezra Klein first noted, the reason why Democrats in the Senate lobbied for her was a different one: They didn't like Larry Summers, President Obama's initial pick, because of his perceived coziness with the big banks.

My personal view is that the Dodd Frank Act has curtailed capital to small business, and one reason why Dodd Frank needs to be reformed is because it making it better for big banks and worse for smaller banks, and this is crony capitalism, not entrepreneurialism.

Tonight on Nightly Business Report, business appears to be booming at the big banks so why did investors send the stocks lower?

Why should we expect Wells Fargo or any other big bank to stop such frauds when they're so lucrative?

That's why an increasing number of voices on both sides of the political spectrum have been pressing for additional reforms that would reduce the chances that the federal government will have to step in to save another big, dumb bank.

(Why don't the authorities ever look into the hiring of former regulators by the big banks?)

And Berkshire Hathaway's big win on its $ 5 billion stake in Bank of America (BAC) is the latest example of why.

Why should the Big Banks be allowed to profit, yet again, on the backs of ordinary Canadian citizens?

If the biggest mortgage bank in the world can not hedge its mortgage servicing book, then why are we even here?

Yesterday, the Dallas Fed Bank released it's 2011 annual report entitled «Choosing the Road to Prosperity: Why We Must End Too Big to Fail — Now.»

But Krugman has a much bigger puzzle to explain away: if free markets in banking are the problem, why did Canada, which, during this period, had a far less regulated banking system than the US, not experience the panics we did, and why did no Canadian banks fail during the Great Depression while around 9000 US banks did?

He breaks down why the industry is facing some of the same problems that brought the US banking system to the brink of oblivion in 2008, and why there will probably be some big moves to the downside coming in the not too distant future.

The retail component of GS is miniscule, which perhaps explains why Gary Cohn thinks breaking up the big banks is such a great idea.

He said the Liberal leader Steven Marshall needed to explain why he was protecting the big banks on a day when the National Australia Bank announced it was axeing 6,000 jobs and had made an annual profit of $ 6.6 billion.

Investors want to know why Australia's biggest cattle exporter, promoted by UBS and Deutsche Bank, became the year's most disastrous float.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

One can only hope that with the huge influx of money coming in from BT that the board are both satisfied with their bumper windfall in pprofit AND realize that as the majority of fans are now aware of the huge influx of money they will now have to start spending or else there will be no more excuses, E.G fans asks why we have not spent big in the summer as we have an extra 20 million in the bank?

Osbourne missed a trick: he should be asking why Labour is not doing more to help the banks to generate big, taxable profits for its new shareholders.

«One of the things I've been trying now for a couple of years is to try to figure out why is it that so many hedge fund managers, wealthy Americans, big banks and executives of Wall Street banks have all lined up supporting and getting involved in the development of charter schools.

Many consumers tend to underutilize their point and mile rewards, which is one reason for why banks can offer much bigger incentives.

Yet while even high profile short says Lehman is not going to fail (and the central bank's latest round of facilities is a big reason why).

Ever wondered why Canada big 5 banks make so much money?

Help me understand, Ben, why you or others would continue to keep your savings with this bank when literally every other option is superior in terms of rates other than maybe the «Big 5» banks and Simplii Financial / Tangerine's regular, posted rates (with their promo rate offers, they beat CTFS handily)?

Big Bank's lawyer explains why they are opposing your discharge.

You can also tell them why you are looking at that very bank for the loan and how their interest rate is a big hindrance is sealing the deal.

At the moment, Big Banks are looking around wildly, wondering why young people like me are moving to high - interest accounts online.

The Big Banks make billions by keeping people in debt, but Manulife Financial benefits more when people don't have debt which must be why they introduced something so radically different from what the other banks oBanks make billions by keeping people in debt, but Manulife Financial benefits more when people don't have debt which must be why they introduced something so radically different from what the other banks obanks offer.

Why is it that when big companies make those hard decisions that we applaud them for stepping up and taking responsibility for their situation, but when individuals do the same things the banks get upset?

Evan's creditors (the big banks and credit card companies) will generally accept a proposal of approximately one third of the total debt, which is why Evan's creditors accepted his $ 20,000 proposal.

And the bottom line is the reason why mortgage rates changes is because it's big business for the banks.

DQ Heroes 1/2 came to PS4 just fine without any outside involvement and they did average at best, and it's always been the case for DQ to not be a good franchise in the west outside of IX, which is why they're actually doing a pretty bold move by banking on the best versions of DQXI to go big in the states.

It's still not clear to us why it has become especially trendy for the big national and foreign banks to commit to building green, but we «re

«Why do you want big banks in this problem?»

If Goldacre really wants to stick his neck out, why doesn't he try arguing against a rich, powerful, bullying Climate - Change establishment which includes all three British main political parties, the National Academy of Sciences, the Royal Society, the Prince of Wales, the Prime Minister, the President of the USA, the EU, the UN, most schools and universities, the BBC, most of the print media, the Australian Government, the New Zealand Government, CNBC, ABC, the New York Times, Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, most of the rest of the City, the wind farm industry, all the Big Oil companies, any number of rich charitable foundations, the Church of England and so on?

Many label this effect a «moral hazard» — echoing the economists» explanation of why «too - big to fail» banks happily took excessive risks with other people's money.

This is great news and one of the biggest benefits of whole life and why you will find that banks, corporations and the wealthy almost all have whole life insurance.

Related Posts Between University and Career is JobSTART101 How social media can break big banks Thanks for a great 2009 from Cube Rules Resume Tip: Why saying a proven track record of success is worthless 5 actions employees should take in case of debt default.

Ask just about anyone working or dealing with the big 12 lending banks, or any major corporation, they are disillusioned, which explains why our sense of leadership and our community support is so broken.

I'm also missing why a bank would sell a performing note at a big enough discount to make this work.

So when a bank customer came in two minutes before it was time to go home asking me why their debit card wouldn't work (which really IS a pretty big deal!)