Sentences with phrase «why carbon capture»

I'll just direct readers to the TreeHugger archives on why we think there's no such thing as clean coal, and why carbon capture and storage can't be relied upon to allow us to keep using even a small percentage of the amount of fossil fuels we continue to burn:

In May, Greenpeace issued a report, False Hope: Why carbon capture and storage won't save the climate that argued «the technology is largely unproven and will not be ready in time to save the climate.»

«Kemper is a stark reminder of why carbon capture and sequestration is a waste of our tax dollars and a false solution to the climate crisis.»

That's why carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology can play a key role.

I have just had a piece published in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: «We'd have to finish one new facility every working day for the next 70 years» — Why carbon capture is no panacea.

Not exact matches

Either that or explain to taxpayers why it is pouring so much money into massive carbon capture projects that will never do what they were designed to do because carbon capture and storage requires carbon pricing to make financial sense.

«We need to develop technologies to do fossil fuels cleanly,» says Secretary of Energy Steven Chu, perhaps explaining why ARPA - E bankrolled five carbon - capture projects in this initial round.

Understanding this leads to three posible pathways we can follow to lower greenhouse gas concentrations, and explains why I've chosen to focus my research on carbon capture and storage.

There are limits, and that is why his team is working on other solutions which can capture carbon directly from the air.

Instead, why not post an article on the carbon cycle, and how it relates to schemes to capture carbon from fossil fuels?

Why can't we make the coal companies put their own money into carbon capture research?

As you state his notion, he is assuming more carbon will be captured when the ice melts and wondering why he doesn't see that documented in the mass media.

(One question is why the bill is focused only on permanent storage of the captured gas; there are other proposals to harvest carbon dioxide and «reprocess» it, in a way, to create fuels.)

That's why supporters of carbon capture argue the technology deserves the same type of support that helped now - mainstream and cost - competitive technologies like wind and solar.

The following statement captures the key principles that we have been advocating for a number of years, including an explanation for why we believe a revenue - neutral carbon tax is the best option to fulfill these key principles.

He was really there saying, why should we divest when carbon capture and sequestration can deal with this problem.

That's why adding carbon capture to a plant would as much as double the cost of electricity, she said.

While, I can not see why building with wood is not considered carbon capturing.

In an interview from his university office, Broecker told CBCNews.ca why he has embraced controversial proposals for capture and sequestration of carbon, helping found a company to develop the technology.