Sentences with phrase «why change the game»

Atlus U.S.A. has also released a blog post explaining why they changed the game's title for the localized version.

Not exact matches

Why it's important: Faucette says such intimacy breaks the ice in an emotional, not just a professional, way, «which is the game - changing pathway to greater profits.»

They changed people's perceptions and that's why we're not satisfied anymore with sub-par superhero games.

Innovation isn't always obvious to the consumer, which is why big companies don't always get the credit they deserve for game - changing moves.

«As a marketer who is committed to providing clients with game - changing solutions, Start with Why made a lasting impression on me and how I approach my work.

Many people have theories why Niantic made these changes — some think the game's three - step tracker had a negative impact on the «Pokémon GO» servers, so they shut down the feature until they could fix the problem — but most people are frustrated not just because this crucial feature was removed, but because Niantic hasn't given any kind of official explanation, and has done nothing to calm worried fans.

Jill Konrath, three - time best - selling author and sales methodology expert, joins us to talk about why a sale equals a change in the status quo for the customer, why experimentation is powerful and necessary in today's sales culture, and why sales is no longer a numbers game but a game of learning more and learning more efficiently.

Join us as we delve into how technology advancements in learning are changing the game and why it's critical to sales success.

In this game - changing program, Marc shares why every organization must have a diversified strategy for attracting clients, a consistent and formal hiring process, a clear plan for developing the skills of each salesperson and a transparent accountability system to ensure sales output.

Why, asks John Leo in U.S. News & World Report, is his own constituency so willing to bring him down with protests, disrupted basketball games, and boycotts, when Pres. Lawrence worked so hard to make Rutgers a campus that «bristles with the enforcement tools of diversity: a speech code, real courses replaced by «multicultural curricular change,» diversity awareness «training» in lectures and freshman orientation sessions, a tolerance for ethnic and racial segregation in dorms («a self - affirming environment,» as Lawrence puts it), and professors who learn not to raise unapproved ideas about race, gender, and the campus power system built around multiculturalism»?

Melissa Clark knows a thing or two about dinner, which is probably why she devoted her new cookbook, Dinner: Changing the Game, to the meal.

Scientists at IRRI who had been working on finding out why had come to a game - changing breakthrough.

Adopting a more plant - based diet can start with making a change one day a week — so why not start by sidelining meat during Monday Night Football games this season?

So until then, why not show a bit of modesty, stop with the big predictions and declarations, start showing on the pitch we have changed, beat every team that's put in front of you and fight each game as if you play in the CL final against Bayern Munich or Barca.

(and of cus there's no guarantee our game will change, you guys need to make use of your brain and know why it is «might» i used... but then again let the thumb down rain on me

So why on Earth did Wenger only make one (enforced) change for the Everton game, when we had all those fresh legs sitting on the bench?

Not last night though, we always knew our chances against Barca would be limited that is why Ox's miss was so frustrating as I believe that goal would have changed the whole atmosphere of the game.

The question I have is why do we change the system or game plan we were using when we started the league.

Bellerin had an awful game, ditto Koscielny and Mustafi, Monreal was so - so, Welbeck was anonymous apart from the goal and his failure to track back led to the second goal, Xhaka looks like an oil tanker which can't change direction, Coquelin was passionate but ineffective, Iwobi has lost his spark and I don't know why he starts before Walcott.

Why would he be all about money now, or why would his love for the game or his team change nWhy would he be all about money now, or why would his love for the game or his team change nwhy would his love for the game or his team change now?

It really was remarkable to see Theo racing back and getting stuck in with tackles to stop Chelsea getting any sort of way back into the game and his own words after the game, reported by the Arsenal website, suggest to me just why his attitude has changed.

On a final note, Wenger might think «I rotated in a few games and they didn't end up all to well» plus «The system is working, why change it», which are fair points but, priorities have to kick in too.

So if we are to ever see the change in manager that a lot of us want, the board needs to realise that keeping Wenger is going to negatively affect the profits, which is why the recent spate of sparse attendances at home games may be doing the trick.

But why are you using 1 performance in an attempt to justify change when there's 7 games we've failed to win from similar opposition.

The game has changed massively since then, with skill, speed and build up play taking precedence over Arsenal's previous free flowing style of play and therefore that is why Arsene Wenger appears to have lost his tactical edge.

Why wouldn't Ozil change his game to play to the strengths of his team mates?

WelBeck changed the game, well hello why did he not start?

I am happy to hear a detailed analysis of why changing to the 4231 won us the game, most of the chatter is pure correlation without any substantiation.

We have scored an average of 2.4 goals per game this season, scoring 48 goals in our 20 competitive matches thus far, and with Alexis Sanchez and Olivier Giroud sharing our striker role, there is no reason why that should change in the near future.

I wonder why no one asks him why sudden change in his approach during the game... how come he stood at least for the first 30 mins beside the line and was giving instructions to the players!?

So it could have been so different and you can see why Arsene Wenger was so angry and why he declared that the ref changed the game, as we can see the stark difference a couple of decisions one way or the other can make.

Yes Bournemouth had three days to recover, but as Howe said after the game: «I'm not going to deny that will have had an impact on the game but that's why you change the squad,» he said.

As soon as the plan of our manager doesn't work out in one single game, some fans immediately show us how genius they are by suggesting a change that must have been done or Why Wenger didn't see that.

I'm not against international friendlys but they need to move them to another date if they can change the World Cup to winter why can't they change these less important games as there nothing but getting in the way.

If you can't do it right then simply add video technology into the equation, why not add the tennis idea to football, give each team 3 decisions that they can instantly review that will be added to extra time anyway but will prevent reds, offside goals, foul goals and anything else that dramatically changes a game.

Why do you assume that Fabregas would not have changed anything if he was in the field instead of Wilshere in the past 8 games?

defensively he did well chasing the ball... we have given chances to other players for years and still they have not developed their full potential, my take is that we (WENGER) does not execute the proper squad rotation, playing the same players again and again, is the reason why we don't have a plan B a second team that can change games and certainly has to be a factor for the out of the chart injuries our players sustain season after season.

it wont change though as Wenger wont spend, the board wont force him and the fans wont boycott the games so as much as it really pains me to admit it NY Gunner has a point when he says why worry about what you cant change?.

A club run by joe Lewis lol when was the last fuking time Spurs won a trophy give it a fuking rest Wenger has won more trophies then spuds in their whole fuking history Sick of plastic fans constantly knocking the manager and players like you are fuking genius experts in knowing all about football We have the worst fan base in football a bunch of ingrates Why would any top player come and join Arsenal when they see how fans treat their own players like ozil Lol at people talking about Spurs and pool fukers don't win any trophies but their fans stay loyal ours turn nasty every game werther we win or lose It won't change even if we get a new manager they will turn on him at first defeat What we need is for the vocal minority of plastic key board fans to fuk off and stop bringing the club down Coyg

I understand the sh!t about why change winning formula, but 1/2 changes per game wont make such a big difference..

Although I've found it very cathartic to speak, vent and end occasionally rant about all things Arsenal, we need to act carefully and intelligently right now or we're going to get played by this club even worse than at present... the pro-Wengerites and the suits, who represent a considerable proportion of the season ticket holders, don't want to believe that there is no plan and that Wenger has mailed it in for several years now or that things are going to get much worse before they get better... why would they... many have spent a considerable sum buying some of the highest priced tickets in the World... they want to have a front row seat to see something special and to be seen doing so, which simply provides ample justification for the expense and the time invested... to many of them, Wenger is the sun in their soccer universe... his awkward disposition, misplaced arrogance and his utter lack of balls makes him a rather unusual cult figure, but the cerebral narrative seemed to embolden those who already felt pretty highly of themselves... many might not even of really liked football that much before his arrival and rarely games they weren't attending... as such, they desperately believe that Wenger, and only Wenger, can supply them with their required fix... if he goes, they were wrong and that's a tough pill to swallow... they would have to admit that they were duped... they will definitely resent whoever made them feel this way, but of course it will be too late by then... so when we go overboard with ridiculous comments bordering of anarchy, it scares the shit out of them and they shift their blame towards us rather than at those who really perpetrated this act of treason... we aren't the enemy... we simply woke much earlier and the reason our comments have gotten more vile in recent years is out of utter frustration... in order for any real change to occur at this club we need to bring as many supporters as possible with us or the big money interests will fade and our ultimate objective will be lost... so it's time to focus on the head instead of the heart for now

Wenger talked after the game about poor defending then does nothing to change the situation why did he not go and get quality defender and dm.

They know football, why shouldn't they be allowed to change their stance after the game?

«That's how critical I thought the play was, and concluded that this is a job for the guys on the floor and I've never done this before, why would I do it tonight and perhaps change the balance of the game?»

Why make substitutions after 70 minutes and expect them have impact and change the game?

Welbeck needs to be give a decent run in the team as a striker before fans can start judging remember he played out on the left for a majority of games for man u and got very little chance to play as a striker hence thats why his goal scoring record looks nothing special but that can change with us he has good pace technically very good and i personally think he will do a good job just give him a chance!

Tuchel will be welcomed all day, he ticks almost all boxes for us passionate, tactical, attractive football most of all we need amanager who is actively involved with game shouting and demanding from by line.we need a manager who will instill character and spine who reads the game and make changes not waiting till the 70th min like we used to.players will have to prove them selves give 100 % and not be judged by a name tag either you perform or NOT.I'd like to see all our players given achance to prove them selves equally have afeeling about one lucas perez given a chance he'll flourish do nt understand why he has been isolated.but what do we know??

Why change your CB pair when they've manage clean sheets in successive games or not reward players like Ox and Lucas who seem hungry and come on with bright displays?

Holding did ok but Chambers was very cocky how many miss passes in dangerous areas did he miss place why didn't he booted the ball way down the field and take the pressure off at the first half the commentator spook of the inexperience of the defense and that liverpool did nt put enough pressure klopp rectified that straight away bang bang bang with runners and no protection while wenger face went all red with nothing to say the only thing that saved us really was the injuries for the game to take a change MR wenger is far to slow to fix things what is wrong with him he most not be in good health or something personnel worrying him cause after all he is the manager his got to have a fast thinking brain smell danger and act fast not seat and debate the issue with bold

Why should the best 10 of the world change his game into something which makes him look ordinary.