Sentences with phrase «why civil cases»

Not exact matches

To date, it has NEVER been allowed to be used as evidence in any case, civil or criminal... why is that?

So if that is the case, why do I have such a humanitarian heart, compassion to those that are even of evil doing, forgiving to those who do wrongs against me, and why is my conversations on issues in my life with Christ the utmost civil and peaceful?

Arguing they are unified by a civil religion may be a difficult task, but it is made easier if a plausible case can be made for why a civil religion might develop in the first place.

Gary Greenberg, who lives in New Baltimore, Greene County, and is a minority owner of the casino, hotel and racetrack Vernon Downs, told the Daily News he can't understand why the Legislature won't act to give adults who were victimized as children more time to bring criminal and civil cases against their abusers.

Civil war has nearly broken out among neuropsychologists over this issue, so let me tread lightly here — I will simply say that I have seen no scientific evidence for how such recovered memories might work, no supposed cases of it documented to be legitimate in a way that should satisfy a rigorous scientist, and plenty of scientific explanations for why various claims have not been legitimate.

In the case of Civil War, we needed a third party, we needed a character who wasn't on either Captain America or Iron Man's side, which is why we went, «You know what?

This certainly seemed to be the case in the initial phase of the Common Core State Standards, when the idea of «fewer, clearer, and higher» standards that were consistent across states was supported by an unprecedented coalition of business, civil rights, government, and labor groups (see McDonnell and Weatherford's (2013) article «Evidence Use and the Common Core State Standards Movement: From Problem Definition to Policy Adoption» in the American Journal of Education for a detailed explanation of the varying reasons why so many different groups initially supported the Common Core).

While he was in jail, climate activist, Tim DeChristopher wrote about his case and why more civil disobedience was needed to protect the environment:

In order to be effective on behalf of clients, whether in a criminal or civil case, attorneys must be ready and willing to delve into questions that may be on the jurors» minds about evidence that was not presented — e.g., Why didn't the police get fingerprints off of the victim's t - shirt?

Sacks says that while the issues, tactics and parties involved in every Supreme Court case are well - reported, «no Supreme Court reporters ever ask the Courtroom's spectators why they have congregated inside the Temple of our Civil Religion.»

So why would your conviction in a separate criminal case have any impact on your civil case?

I'm not sure why you've used the term «civil servant» to refer to marriage commissioners, it seems to imply that they're government employees, which is clearly not the case.

The reasons why range from 5th Amendment implications all the way to whether a judge might view using the more open civil discovery process to skirt the rules established for criminal case discovery.

The final report of the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, A Roadmap for Change, tackles the difficult problem of why this is the case and lays out... [more]

Professor Tania Sourdin, dealt with the research question...» Why do some civil cases end up in a full hearing?»

The final report of the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, A Roadmap for Change, tackles the difficult problem of why this is the case and lays out recommendations for what can be done to bring full access to justice to Canadians.

If the civil standard applied in relation to civil fraud so far as VAT is concerned, then there was no reason in principle why it should not apply to such matters in relation to income tax, and negligence was then an a fortiori case.

That's why a person can be found not guilty in a criminal trial, but still be found liable for damages in a civil case.

There must be some compelling analysis why the interests of justice require in a particular case the extraordinary step of abrogating the other requirements of the Supreme Court Civil Rules.

She asked petitioner's counsel about Scott's argument; his response was that Scott's formulation is «incorrect» because inconsistent with prior cases and the Rules of Civil Procedure, although without explaining whether or why that formulation is normatively wrong.

There's really no reason why you can't write down, at least in outline form, what you want to include in that motion ahead of time — all the elements of the defense in a criminal case, or the requirements of the civil cause of action.